Adkins - Pros and Cons

847 posts
User avatar
Pepe the Horseman
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 18278
Joined: 23 Jun 2011 10:24
Location: Putting right what once went wrong

Re: Adkins - Pros and Cons

by Pepe the Horseman » 24 Oct 2014 14:11

I've missed this

User avatar
Maguire
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 12094
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 12:26

Re: Adkins - Pros and Cons

by Maguire » 24 Oct 2014 14:12

Pepe the Horseman I've missed this


I was hoping he'd got over it tbh.

User avatar
Extended-Phenotype
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5907
Joined: 27 May 2011 10:43
Location: Oxford Road

Re: Adkins - Pros and Cons

by Extended-Phenotype » 24 Oct 2014 14:14

Maguire
Extended-Phenotype
Maguire I was merely addressing the assertion that we have a very inexperienced squad. We don't.

The addition of Akpan as an international was a little light humour on my part.


1) Not sure the point being made was that we lack experience on the injury list but if you think its worth pointing out, go for it
2) Hee hee


Thank you for what was, as ever, a spellbinding contribution on your part.


No problemo. It was no "shut up, loads of players that aren't playing are experienced" but one day maybe I can reach those dizzy heights of salience.

User avatar
Extended-Phenotype
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5907
Joined: 27 May 2011 10:43
Location: Oxford Road

Re: Adkins - Pros and Cons

by Extended-Phenotype » 24 Oct 2014 14:18

Maguire
Pepe the Horseman I've missed this


I was hoping he'd got over it tbh.


:?:

Mate, there is no beef from me, it's you who is taking your shirt off - I said I understood your point but thought half your list wasn't particularly relevant. Wasn't trying to be spell-binding, either. Just thought it was worth pointing out.

User avatar
Maguire
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 12094
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 12:26

Re: Adkins - Pros and Cons

by Maguire » 24 Oct 2014 14:28

The o/p (andrew someone or other) addressed the topic of injuries in an entirely separate point. I helpfully clipped this out of my quote to make it clear which of his points I was replying to.

I doubt anybody will contest the injury list, but 11 (or so) of the players I mentioned have had game time this season - it's just a myth that we sold off all our experience and are left with a squad full of under 21s.


User avatar
HoneyRoastHoax
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1228
Joined: 07 Mar 2012 09:22

Re: Adkins - Pros and Cons

by HoneyRoastHoax » 24 Oct 2014 14:59

Maguire The o/p (andrew someone or other) addressed the topic of injuries in an entirely separate point. I helpfully clipped this out of my quote to make it clear which of his points I was replying to.

I doubt anybody will contest the injury list, but 11 (or so) of the players I mentioned have had game time this season - it's just a myth that we sold off all our experience and are left with a squad full of under 21s.


We have sold our most valuable and arguably best performing players and have done for many years with little investment to back it up.

This is what happens.

I can understand people instantly leaping to sack the manager, this has been happening for a long time. We were lucky with the bargains that were Doyle, Kitson, Long, Alf and fortunate to produce someone like the Sig.

User avatar
Hoop Blah
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 13937
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:00
Location: I told you so.....

Re: Adkins - Pros and Cons

by Hoop Blah » 24 Oct 2014 15:15

I think it's still fair to say that the 'squad' Adkins has had to select from is pretty inexperienced (and basically shit!) in certain areas and the lack of strength/experience in depth is seriously hampering things.

Our first choice back four contains two players who've played about 40 Championship games in defence between them. Beyond those two we have no cover or competition. That's where we're lacking.

In the middle of the park we're relying on players, Norwood aside, with very limited experience and it just makes us far too easy to bully and breakdown. Our two best midfielders who've been available are Norwood (who looks very tidy) and Akpan who, depsite his size and stature, is powderpuff, scared of a tackle and isn't naturally comfortable shielding the back four. It's a shame we've not seen more of Kuhl though, but him and Norwood together is just too lightweight isn't it?

It's Adkins responsibilty to address those weaknesses though.

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: Adkins - Pros and Cons

by Ian Royal » 24 Oct 2014 17:00

Hoop Blah I think it's still fair to say that the 'squad' Adkins has had to select from is pretty inexperienced (and basically shit!) in certain areas and the lack of strength/experience in depth is seriously hampering things.

Our first choice back four contains two players who've played about 40 Championship games in defence between them. Beyond those two we have no cover or competition. That's where we're lacking.

In the middle of the park we're relying on players, Norwood aside, with very limited experience and it just makes us far too easy to bully and breakdown. Our two best midfielders who've been available are Norwood (who looks very tidy) and Akpan who, depsite his size and stature, is powderpuff, scared of a tackle and isn't naturally comfortable shielding the back four. It's a shame we've not seen more of Kuhl though, but him and Norwood together is just too lightweight isn't it?

It's Adkins responsibilty to address those weaknesses though.

This.

User avatar
RoyallyFcuked
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1258
Joined: 18 Jul 2012 02:29
Location: Y25 Row KK 2005-2007

Re: We as fans NEED to back Adkins

by RoyallyFcuked » 30 Oct 2014 18:31

sandman If you think it's ott then that's your prerogative but the evidence so far in comparison with the rest of his managerial career suggests it's not far fetched at all. Some people and their methods work at certain clubs but not others and that is what we are seeing here.


I just think its too early to be saying that. As others have said, we've had all sorts of problems since Adkins has been here. We havent even got a fully fit squad yet. When our team is at full strength for a while at least, thats when we can make a fairer judgement on Adkins at RFC.


Zana Badawi
Member
Posts: 373
Joined: 29 Oct 2013 19:18

Re: Adkins - Pros and Cons

by Zana Badawi » 31 Oct 2014 12:18

Ian Royal
Hoop Blah
It's Adkins responsibilty to address those weaknesses though.

This.


Its also Adkins' job to stop them happening in the first place.

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: Adkins - Pros and Cons

by Ian Royal » 31 Oct 2014 18:00

Zana Badawi
Ian Royal
Hoop Blah
It's Adkins responsibilty to address those weaknesses though.

This.


Its also Adkins' job to stop them happening in the first place.

Yeah, well. There's a lot of point in trying that now isn't there. And he's hardly totally in control of injuries and he's got oxf*rd all control of when he's got money.

User avatar
Royal Rother
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 21805
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 23:22
Location: The handsome bald fella with the blue eyes

Re: Adkins - Pros and Cons

by Royal Rother » 01 Nov 2014 12:36

Coppell's sessions had no tackling - not sure how they learned to tackle but that's what Kevin Dillon said.

(As a result?) Team 106 had a remarkably injury-free season.

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: Adkins - Pros and Cons

by Ian Royal » 01 Nov 2014 13:10

Royal Rother Coppell's sessions had no tackling - not sure how they learned to tackle but that's what Kevin Dillon said.

(As a result?) Team 106 had a remarkably injury-free season.

That's why I said 'totally'. We did get injuries in that season, just not many and fairly spread out. Shorey, was out for a few weeks, Sidwell was out briefly, Lita broke his leg, Little was out for a while.

And plenty of our injuries this season & from last season, occurred during games not training. And not tackling in training is not going to help much with that.

Tackling's overrated as Harper showed anyway. Keep the ball and when you don't have it force an error. Tackling is a last resort.


P!ssed Off
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3132
Joined: 08 Dec 2012 16:47

Re: Adkins - Pros and Cons

by P!ssed Off » 01 Nov 2014 14:11

Lita broke his ankle, not leg.

Lacoste

Re: Adkins - Pros and Cons

by Lacoste » 01 Nov 2014 14:15

Ian couldn't tell from the comfort of his radio

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: Adkins - Pros and Cons

by Ian Royal » 01 Nov 2014 14:31

P!ssed Off Lita broke his ankle, not leg.

Thank you, that really makes a difference.

P!ssed Off
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3132
Joined: 08 Dec 2012 16:47

Re: Adkins - Pros and Cons

by P!ssed Off » 01 Nov 2014 14:39

Ian Royal
P!ssed Off Lita broke his ankle, not leg.

Thank you, that really makes a difference.


Yes, they are significantly different injuries, I agree.

Man Friday
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2856
Joined: 20 Nov 2005 13:45

Re: Adkins - Pros and Cons

by Man Friday » 01 Nov 2014 16:45

Pros....

Cons...feckin useless.

Time for a change.

User avatar
Winston Smith
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5219
Joined: 06 Aug 2014 16:09
Location: Ministry of Truth

Re: Adkins - Pros and Cons

by Winston Smith » 01 Nov 2014 19:02

Has he gone yet?

User avatar
ManchesterRoyals
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2609
Joined: 22 Aug 2012 20:39
Location: Salford

Re: Adkins - Pros and Cons

by ManchesterRoyals » 01 Nov 2014 19:03

Anyone know what he said after the game today?

847 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], rabidbee and 312 guests

It is currently 16 Nov 2024 03:50