by Royality creeps In » 08 Nov 2014 20:39
by peterroyal76 » 08 Nov 2014 20:42
by sandman » 08 Nov 2014 20:45
Royal_jimmy Still think it was the right call. I personally could not stand the football we played under him. We are never going to be an established premier league side playing the way we played under him. Brian made so many mistakes in the premier league as well especially on signings when we had £10m available to re-sign Gylfi.
I just have a feeling if we'd stuck with Brian we wouldn't be any better off than we are now. Teams worked out how we played and easily stopped us in the prem.
by peterroyal76 » 08 Nov 2014 20:56
sandmanRoyal_jimmy Still think it was the right call. I personally could not stand the football we played under him. We are never going to be an established premier league side playing the way we played under him. Brian made so many mistakes in the premier league as well especially on signings when we had £10m available to re-sign Gylfi.
I just have a feeling if we'd stuck with Brian we wouldn't be any better off than we are now. Teams worked out how we played and easily stopped us in the prem.
We had no chance of signing Gylfi! We kept going back with more and more ridiculous offers that we couldn't afford. The football we played under him was adapted to the ability of the players at our disposal which makes your mention of Gylfi even more interesting because it's very doubtful we would have played a counter attacking 4-4-2 had he not been sold to Hoffenheim.
by Royal Lady » 08 Nov 2014 21:04
by Ian Royal » 08 Nov 2014 23:30
Royality creeps In If you think that was poor? How are you finding the turgid shite turned out by Adkins in the league below?
Royal Lady McD didn't have to say how much (little) he was given by AZ - but he did. Anyone who believes AZ had any intention of spending millions is deluded. Where do you think all that money has gone that we got through going up, parachute payments etc - conversely, no-one know how much/little Adkins has had to spend - but you can be sure that every single game we played under McD we gave it a bloody good go and McD could never be accused of not trying - long ball or not.
by Elm Park Old Boy » 08 Nov 2014 23:47
by Ian Royal » 08 Nov 2014 23:54
Elm Park Old Boy I never thought it was right to sack BM. Nor would I favour sacking Adkins now.
But one thing is clear to me: right now if Reading concede a goal, they look beaten, while in McD's last Championship season, as soon as Reading scored a goal you could be confident they would win.
by Cureton's Volley » 09 Nov 2014 00:09
Ian RoyalRoyality creeps In If you think that was poor? How are you finding the turgid shite turned out by Adkins in the league below?
Much superior on the whole ta.
by Elm Park Old Boy » 09 Nov 2014 00:16
Ian RoyalElm Park Old Boy I never thought it was right to sack BM. Nor would I favour sacking Adkins now.
But one thing is clear to me: right now if Reading concede a goal, they look beaten, while in McD's last Championship season, as soon as Reading scored a goal you could be confident they would win.
You are aware we've only failed to win one game in which we've scored first this season under Adkins right?
.
by sandman » 09 Nov 2014 00:50
by melonhead » 09 Nov 2014 01:03
Royal Lady Where do you think all that money has gone that we got through going up, parachute payments etc -
by leon » 09 Nov 2014 01:05
Ian RoyalElm Park Old Boy I never thought it was right to sack BM. Nor would I favour sacking Adkins now.
But one thing is clear to me: right now if Reading concede a goal, they look beaten, while in McD's last Championship season, as soon as Reading scored a goal you could be confident they would win.
The conceding thing is a bitch, but that's why it's encouraging that we didn't fall apart today after conceding the first and were still in it all the way, even if we couldn't get it in in the end this time.
by P!ssed Off » 09 Nov 2014 02:10
Ian Royal The conceding thing is a bitch, but that's why it's encouraging that we didn't fall apart today after conceding the first and were still in it all the way, even if we couldn't get it in in the end this time.
by Avon Royal » 09 Nov 2014 07:53
leonIan RoyalElm Park Old Boy I never thought it was right to sack BM. Nor would I favour sacking Adkins now.
But one thing is clear to me: right now if Reading concede a goal, they look beaten, while in McD's last Championship season, as soon as Reading scored a goal you could be confident they would win.
The conceding thing is a bitch, but that's why it's encouraging that we didn't fall apart today after conceding the first and were still in it all the way, even if we couldn't get it in in the end this time.
WE WERE AT HOME TO F UCKING CHARLTON
IS THIS REALLY ACCEPTABLE??
by Man Friday » 09 Nov 2014 07:58
semtex1871Mid Sussex Royal We've only got Mcdermott's spin on the amount of money available during the 2012/13 season from the other week.....
exactly.....McDermott was telling the dinlows what they wanted to hear and they fell for it
by Royal Lady » 09 Nov 2014 09:41
Man Fridaysemtex1871Mid Sussex Royal We've only got Mcdermott's spin on the amount of money available during the 2012/13 season from the other week.....
exactly.....McDermott was telling the dinlows what they wanted to hear and they fell for it
If you think Brian would blatantly lie over this then you're a bigger pr@t than I thought - and that's saying something.
by sandman » 09 Nov 2014 09:55
Man Fridaysemtex1871Mid Sussex Royal We've only got Mcdermott's spin on the amount of money available during the 2012/13 season from the other week.....
exactly.....McDermott was telling the dinlows what they wanted to hear and they fell for it
If you think Brian would blatantly lie over this then you're a bigger pr@t than I thought - and that's saying something.
by semtex1871 » 09 Nov 2014 10:07
Man Fridaysemtex1871Mid Sussex Royal We've only got Mcdermott's spin on the amount of money available during the 2012/13 season from the other week.....
exactly.....McDermott was telling the dinlows what they wanted to hear and they fell for it
If you think Brian would blatantly lie over this then you're a bigger pr@t than I thought - and that's saying something.
by sandman » 09 Nov 2014 10:22
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 156 guests