by loyalroyal4life » 09 Nov 2014 18:51
by SCIAG » 09 Nov 2014 19:03
by mad79 » 09 Nov 2014 19:05
by Pepe the Horseman » 09 Nov 2014 19:07
by AthleticoSpizz » 09 Nov 2014 19:11
non-plussed, but haven't we heard this on here before?loyalroyal4life He is not right for us, certainly not long term.
May as well get rid of him now and rebuild for next season.
by Ian Royal » 09 Nov 2014 19:59
windermere_royal This forum is almost equally divided between pro and anti Adkins, one way or another something needs to be done. either we need to improve . or he needs to go to unite us all to the Reading cause again , I`m sicerely hoping it`s the former, but even I accept the next 7 fixture before the new year will define whether he is right for the long term future of our club
by Royal Lady » 10 Nov 2014 08:44
Ian Royalwindermere_royal This forum is almost equally divided between pro and anti Adkins, one way or another something needs to be done. either we need to improve . or he needs to go to unite us all to the Reading cause again , I`m sicerely hoping it`s the former, but even I accept the next 7 fixture before the new year will define whether he is right for the long term future of our club
Thankfully, at the match the support for him is significantly greater in number than the haters.
To be honest the one reason for him to go is to shut up the whining morons who can't get over McDermott's sacking so they can move on and as you say we can get some unity.
by HoneyRoastHoax » 10 Nov 2014 09:42
by sandman » 10 Nov 2014 09:57
HoneyRoastHoax For all these Adkins out people (who by the way can't seem to actually put a decent argument together for why we should sack him or perhaps I just haven't read one yet) how much of an enticing proposition do you think our club would be for a new manager?
We've just sacked a widely respected manager for being mid table even though we have sold some key players and had been hit with injuries.
New owners we know very little about and a history of not spending when its required ie upon promotion.
Or are you all just banking on Dolan wanting it?
by Nameless » 10 Nov 2014 10:05
Royal LadyIan Royalwindermere_royal This forum is almost equally divided between pro and anti Adkins, one way or another something needs to be done. either we need to improve . or he needs to go to unite us all to the Reading cause again , I`m sicerely hoping it`s the former, but even I accept the next 7 fixture before the new year will define whether he is right for the long term future of our club
Thankfully, at the match the support for him is significantly greater in number than the haters.
To be honest the one reason for him to go is to shut up the whining morons who can't get over McDermott's sacking so they can move on and as you say we can get some unity.
Just cos some people chant "Nigel Adkins' Barmy Army" and others don't boo him does not mean that the support for him at the match is significantly greater than the "haters" I know lots of people at the games who don't want him here - they just have slightly greater intellect than to think it's worth booing him or however else you should show you "hate" as you put it. It's interesting that attendance has been down, perhaps a lot of "haters" have been voting with their feet?
by leon » 10 Nov 2014 10:39
by Mr Angry » 10 Nov 2014 10:40
by leon » 10 Nov 2014 10:42
Mr Angry Seriously; ANOTHER thread on the same subject???
Each time there is a defeat, there is another poll or thread asking whether Adkins should stay or go; it really is a total waste of bandwidth.
FFS all that is going to happen are that those that want Adkins out will re-state their views, and those that think he should be given more time will re-state their views.
Certain posters will slag off other posters who will slag them back off again and we end up where we are.
What is the bloody point?
I seem to recall a mod stating that the next Adkins thread wouldn't even get a merging but would be eliminated immediately............
by WoodleyRoyal » 10 Nov 2014 10:54
Mr Angry Seriously; ANOTHER thread on the same subject???
FFS all that is going to happen are that those that want Adkins out will re-state their views, and those that think he should be given more time will re-state their views.
Certain posters will slag off other posters who will slag them back off again and we end up where we are.
by Sutekh » 10 Nov 2014 11:17
by leon » 10 Nov 2014 11:22
Sutekh Blimey this is tight, thought it would be a landlslide for the voices of reason on here...
by HoneyRoastHoax » 10 Nov 2014 11:45
sandmanHoneyRoastHoax For all these Adkins out people (who by the way can't seem to actually put a decent argument together for why we should sack him or perhaps I just haven't read one yet) how much of an enticing proposition do you think our club would be for a new manager?
We've just sacked a widely respected manager for being mid table even though we have sold some key players and had been hit with injuries.
New owners we know very little about and a history of not spending when its required ie upon promotion.
Or are you all just banking on Dolan wanting it?
Are you really serious with that? Absolutely ridiculous to suggest the Reading job wouldn't be an enticing proposition for any competent and ambitious manager looking for work at this level.
Seriously, if you're going to attack people for supposedly being unreasonable to Nigel Adkins don't destroy any credibility you might have by coming up with stupid statements like that.
We managed to get a new manager having sacked a highly respected manager, after not spending any money and being on the verge of relegation before so I think we would manage to find one now should we choose to look.
by sandman » 10 Nov 2014 11:56
HoneyRoastHoaxsandmanHoneyRoastHoax For all these Adkins out people (who by the way can't seem to actually put a decent argument together for why we should sack him or perhaps I just haven't read one yet) how much of an enticing proposition do you think our club would be for a new manager?
We've just sacked a widely respected manager for being mid table even though we have sold some key players and had been hit with injuries.
New owners we know very little about and a history of not spending when its required ie upon promotion. This
Or are you all just banking on Dolan wanting it?
Are you really serious with that? Absolutely ridiculous to suggest the Reading job wouldn't be an enticing proposition for any competent and ambitious manager looking for work at this level.
Seriously, if you're going to attack people for supposedly being unreasonable to Nigel Adkins don't destroy any credibility you might have by coming up with stupid statements like that.
We managed to get a new manager having sacked a highly respected manager, after not spending any money and being on the verge of relegation before so I think we would manage to find one now should we choose to look.
Calm down buddy, read it again. I asked how much of an enticing prospect it would be. I also didn't attack anyone.
Jeez did Nige run over your cat?
by RoyalBlue » 10 Nov 2014 12:49
by Brum Royal » 10 Nov 2014 12:53
leon What is it with football fans - why does everything have to be so black and white? It's not.
It's not "haters" vs the delusional Adkins zealots (although HRH is doing a fine job of the latter)
There are a number of people who aren't particularly happy with the football but are willing to give Adkins more time - however we need to see signs of improvement. Bashing Blackpool and Rotherham and then getting done by Charlton who really weren't that good is not encouraging. Attendance is down and our football isn't really very inspiring.
We've got injuries yes, but with McCleary coming back and Williams getting back to sharpness we should see drastic improvement surely?
Users browsing this forum: ankeny, Freddy, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], RFCMod, Royals and Racers and 211 guests