by Baggie192 » 18 Dec 2014 20:07
by strap » 18 Dec 2014 20:26
by royalp-we » 18 Dec 2014 20:36
by Esteban » 18 Dec 2014 20:37
by Armadillo Roadkill » 18 Dec 2014 20:45
by robinfridayfan » 18 Dec 2014 21:18
by Baggie192 » 18 Dec 2014 21:20
strap You can actually chart our problems way back in 1970/71 when "The Board", in their infinite wisdom, decided to sack Jack Mansell after a dismal run that left us in dire straits towards the foot of old Div 4.
In a few short months he had transformed us into the original "tippy tappy" team that Barca, (amongst many others), have subsequently copied and tried to convince the world that they invented.
True RFC followers of course know the truth. Yes, it could be argued that the Div 4 teams of the day "found us out", but had Jack been given more time, I am convinced he could have taken us a long long way.
This is honestly NOT a wind up. The football his team played in 69/70 was a joy to behold, and it was solely his style of play that got this, (then 11 year old), nut job hooked on RFC.
Since those days, we have witnessed the honest endeavours of teams created by Charlie Hurley and Maurice Evans, the hoof-ball of Ian Branfoot, the dire DIRE crap served up by the likes of Porterfield, Bullivant and the charlatons Burns and Bodgers, along with the often entertaining fare produced by McGhee (spit), Pardew (spit), the Quinn/Gooding hero combo, as well as the modern wonders of Sir Steve Coppell and the unlucky McDermott.
This brings up to the present, and probably the real cause of our current plight. Nigel Adkins was given a posioned chalice by the Russian conmen, and if we are to be totally honest, he behaved like an impecable gentlemen, what with all the behind the scenes crap he had to deal with. His style of play was perhaps less than acceptbale. However, I believe history will only be able to judge him fairly once the full truth of the Russian's parsimonious behaviour comes to light.
Let us hope that the Thai's behave in a more honest manner than the Russians. Based on generic national traits, it would seem that this is not a forlorn hope. The appointment of Steve Clarke would appear on the surface to be a sensible and proactive move, and it is clear we need a coach far more than a manager right now.
Apologies, that was written with the benefit of a bottle of red wine.
In short, the answwr to your question is - Anton Zingaravich.
Hope that helps.
by tmesis » 18 Dec 2014 21:25
by strap » 18 Dec 2014 21:46
Baggie192strap You can actually chart our problems way back in 1970/71 when "The Board", in their infinite wisdom, decided to sack Jack Mansell after a dismal run that left us in dire straits towards the foot of old Div 4.
In a few short months he had transformed us into the original "tippy tappy" team that Barca, (amongst many others), have subsequently copied and tried to convince the world that they invented.
True RFC followers of course know the truth. Yes, it could be argued that the Div 4 teams of the day "found us out", but had Jack been given more time, I am convinced he could have taken us a long long way.
This is honestly NOT a wind up. The football his team played in 69/70 was a joy to behold, and it was solely his style of play that got this, (then 11 year old), nut job hooked on RFC.
Since those days, we have witnessed the honest endeavours of teams created by Charlie Hurley and Maurice Evans, the hoof-ball of Ian Branfoot, the dire DIRE crap served up by the likes of Porterfield, Bullivant and the charlatons Burns and Bodgers, along with the often entertaining fare produced by McGhee (spit), Pardew (spit), the Quinn/Gooding hero combo, as well as the modern wonders of Sir Steve Coppell and the unlucky McDermott.
This brings up to the present, and probably the real cause of our current plight. Nigel Adkins was given a posioned chalice by the Russian conmen, and if we are to be totally honest, he behaved like an impecable gentlemen, what with all the behind the scenes crap he had to deal with. His style of play was perhaps less than acceptbale. However, I believe history will only be able to judge him fairly once the full truth of the Russian's parsimonious behaviour comes to light.
Let us hope that the Thai's behave in a more honest manner than the Russians. Based on generic national traits, it would seem that this is not a forlorn hope. The appointment of Steve Clarke would appear on the surface to be a sensible and proactive move, and it is clear we need a coach far more than a manager right now.
Apologies, that was written with the benefit of a bottle of red wine.
In short, the answwr to your question is - Anton Zingaravich.
Hope that helps.
Thank you sir, for such an awesome answer. It's a shame, Sir John sold up, but, thats footy now I suppose. We had our problems from the late 80's until th early 00's. We didn't get back to "the true footballing West Bromwich Albion of the 70's" when RDM was appointed. Sadly, we'd reached the point where yo-yoing wasn't going to benefit us anymore. This brought The Hodgson Era which saw us somewhat stabilise.
Sadly, we lost both Roy and our DOF who were poached by the FA. Ashworth the DOF worked a season's notice though, so was in office during Clarke's first season. That where we made our mistake the DOF's replacement wasn't good. That's what Clarke needs most of all a strong DOF. His summer window last year was a disaster I hold my hands up and say it's as much fault of club as it was Clarke's. He was able to break our transfer record twice with Stephane Sessegnon and Victor Anichebe who have now found there places in the club. I would say the most important thing for Reading to do, is get him best DOF possible because he isn't a manager and was never hired by us to be one
by Ian Royal » 18 Dec 2014 22:08
Baggie192
Thank you sir, for such an awesome answer. It's a shame, Sir John sold up, but, thats footy now I suppose. We had our problems from the late 80's until th early 00's. We didn't get back to "the true footballing West Bromwich Albion of the 70's" when RDM was appointed. Sadly, we'd reached the point where yo-yoing wasn't going to benefit us anymore. This brought The Hodgson Era which saw us somewhat stabilise.
Sadly, we lost both Roy and our DOF who were poached by the FA. Ashworth the DOF worked a season's notice though, so was in office during Clarke's first season. That where we made our mistake the DOF's replacement wasn't good. That's what Clarke needs most of all a strong DOF. His summer window last year was a disaster I hold my hands up and say it's as much fault of club as it was Clarke's. He was able to break our transfer record twice with Stephane Sessegnon and Victor Anichebe who have now found there places in the club. I would say the most important thing for Reading to do, is get him best DOF possible because he isn't a manager and was never hired by us to be one
by Lower West » 18 Dec 2014 22:22
where did it all go wrong?
by Pseud O'Nym » 18 Dec 2014 23:24
by Millsy » 18 Dec 2014 23:48
Baggie192 Apologies if this is a naive question but as title. when we were both in the prem last I thought you had squad that hadn't quite gelled into a team at that time. You always struck as well run. although I don't support you, I quite like you and always have. So, whats gone wrong?
by Mike Hunt » 19 Dec 2014 00:15
strap You can actually chart our problems way back in 1970/71 when "The Board", in their infinite wisdom, decided to sack Jack Mansell after a dismal run that left us in dire straits towards the foot of old Div 4.
In a few short months he had transformed us into the original "tippy tappy" team that Barca, (amongst many others), have subsequently copied and tried to convince the world that they invented.
True RFC followers of course know the truth. Yes, it could be argued that the Div 4 teams of the day "found us out", but had Jack been given more time, I am convinced he could have taken us a long long way.
This is honestly NOT a wind up. The football his team played in 69/70 was a joy to behold, and it was solely his style of play that got this, (then 11 year old), nut job hooked on RFC.
Since those days, we have witnessed the honest endeavours of teams created by Charlie Hurley and Maurice Evans, the hoof-ball of Ian Branfoot, the dire DIRE crap served up by the likes of Porterfield, Bullivant and the charlatons Burns and Bodgers, along with the often entertaining fare produced by McGhee (spit), Pardew (spit), the Quinn/Gooding hero combo, as well as the modern wonders of Sir Steve Coppell and the unlucky McDermott.
This brings up to the present, and probably the real cause of our current plight. Nigel Adkins was given a posioned chalice by the Russian conmen, and if we are to be totally honest, he behaved like an impecable gentlemen, what with all the behind the scenes crap he had to deal with. His style of play was perhaps less than acceptbale. However, I believe history will only be able to judge him fairly once the full truth of the Russian's parsimonious behaviour comes to light.
Let us hope that the Thai's behave in a more honest manner than the Russians. Based on generic national traits, it would seem that this is not a forlorn hope. The appointment of Steve Clarke would appear on the surface to be a sensible and proactive move, and it is clear we need a coach far more than a manager right now.
Apologies, that was written with the benefit of a bottle of red wine.
In short, the answwr to your question is - Anton Zingaravich.
Hope that helps.
by leon » 19 Dec 2014 00:58
Esteban We're essentially a small club, from a place with a small town mentality. We've had a fairly large influx of people from London, who all brought club loyalties with them. You find a lot of West Ham, Spurs, Arsenal, Chelsea and QPR fans around. It's only on the past ten years or so that we've had consecutive seasons in the Championship, with a few flirtations with the Premier League. As a result, we don't have a large fan base, although we do pick up quite a few casual fans in periods of success.
Add to that an owner who either didn't want to, or couldn't afford to invest in the squad to Premier League levels, followed by a sale to a Russian who had even less money (but spent it anyway) and you have problem.
by RoyallyFcuked » 19 Dec 2014 02:58
by marlowuk » 19 Dec 2014 03:27
2 world wars, 1 world cupBaggie192 Apologies if this is a naive question but as title. when we were both in the prem last I thought you had squad that hadn't quite gelled into a team at that time. You always struck as well run. although I don't support you, I quite like you and always have. So, whats gone wrong?
Most of us could see the massive cracks appearing in the club when we bizarrely chose not to invest in the Prem the first time round.
by Dick Habbin's hairdo » 19 Dec 2014 06:30
strap You can actually chart our problems way back in 1970/71 when "The Board", in their infinite wisdom, decided to sack Jack Mansell after a dismal run that left us in dire straits towards the foot of old Div 4.
In a few short months he had transformed us into the original "tippy tappy" team that Barca, (amongst many others), have subsequently copied and tried to convince the world that they invented.
True RFC followers of course know the truth. Yes, it could be argued that the Div 4 teams of the day "found us out", but had Jack been given more time, I am convinced he could have taken us a long long way.
This is honestly NOT a wind up. The football his team played in 69/70 was a joy to behold, and it was solely his style of play that got this, (then 11 year old), nut job hooked on RFC.
Since those days, we have witnessed the honest endeavours of teams created by Charlie Hurley and Maurice Evans, the hoof-ball of Ian Branfoot, the dire DIRE crap served up by the likes of Porterfield, Bullivant and the charlatons Burns and Bodgers, along with the often entertaining fare produced by McGhee (spit), Pardew (spit), the Quinn/Gooding hero combo, as well as the modern wonders of Sir Steve Coppell and the unlucky McDermott.
This brings up to the present, and probably the real cause of our current plight. Nigel Adkins was given a posioned chalice by the Russian conmen, and if we are to be totally honest, he behaved like an impecable gentlemen, what with all the behind the scenes crap he had to deal with. His style of play was perhaps less than acceptbale. However, I believe history will only be able to judge him fairly once the full truth of the Russian's parsimonious behaviour comes to light.
Let us hope that the Thai's behave in a more honest manner than the Russians. Based on generic national traits, it would seem that this is not a forlorn hope. The appointment of Steve Clarke would appear on the surface to be a sensible and proactive move, and it is clear we need a coach far more than a manager right now.
Apologies, that was written with the benefit of a bottle of red wine.
In short, the answwr to your question is - Anton Zingaravich.
Hope that helps.
by From Despair To Where? » 19 Dec 2014 09:21
by nailseabiscuitman » 19 Dec 2014 10:07
strap You can actually chart our problems way back in 1970/71 when "The Board", in their infinite wisdom, decided to sack Jack Mansell after a dismal run that left us in dire straits towards the foot of old Div 4.
In a few short months he had transformed us into the original "tippy tappy" team that Barca, (amongst many others), have subsequently copied and tried to convince the world that they invented.
True RFC followers of course know the truth. Yes, it could be argued that the Div 4 teams of the day "found us out", but had Jack been given more time, I am convinced he could have taken us a long long way.
This is honestly NOT a wind up. The football his team played in 69/70 was a joy to behold, and it was solely his style of play that got this, (then 11 year old), nut job hooked on RFC.
Since those days, we have witnessed the honest endeavours of teams created by Charlie Hurley and Maurice Evans, the hoof-ball of Ian Branfoot, the dire DIRE crap served up by the likes of Porterfield, Bullivant and the charlatons Burns and Bodgers, along with the often entertaining fare produced by McGhee (spit), Pardew (spit), the Quinn/Gooding hero combo, as well as the modern wonders of Sir Steve Coppell and the unlucky McDermott.
This brings up to the present, and probably the real cause of our current plight. Nigel Adkins was given a posioned chalice by the Russian conmen, and if we are to be totally honest, he behaved like an impecable gentlemen, what with all the behind the scenes crap he had to deal with. His style of play was perhaps less than acceptbale. However, I believe history will only be able to judge him fairly once the full truth of the Russian's parsimonious behaviour comes to light.
Let us hope that the Thai's behave in a more honest manner than the Russians. Based on generic national traits, it would seem that this is not a forlorn hope. The appointment of Steve Clarke would appear on the surface to be a sensible and proactive move, and it is clear we need a coach far more than a manager right now.
Apologies, that was written with the benefit of a bottle of red wine.
In short, the answwr to your question is - Anton Zingaravich.
Hope that helps.
Users browsing this forum: Royality creeps In and 231 guests