Pepe the Horseman Almost certainly.
Yes ok fair enough. I can see why you'd think we would manage that - we were definitely turning a corner as shown in the 6-1 drubbing @ St Andrews.
I too was surprised he got the boot.
by MmmMonsterMunch » 01 Mar 2015 15:34
Pepe the Horseman Almost certainly.
by Ian Royal » 01 Mar 2015 15:44
MmmMonsterMunchExtended-Phenotype He hasn't got a clue what he's doing. We are scoring less and now conceding more than under Adkins. We've been playing some of the worst football I've seen.
Absolutely ridiculous statement. Utter utter sh1t.
Under Adkins we were getting to HT regularly with not one shot on goal or have u forgotten that? Even at FT a lot of the games only had 1 or 2 attempts on goal. The players were despondent & not playing for him.
by melonhead » 01 Mar 2015 15:52
Ian RoyalMmmMonsterMunchExtended-Phenotype He hasn't got a clue what he's doing. We are scoring less and now conceding more than under Adkins. We've been playing some of the worst football I've seen.
Absolutely ridiculous statement. Utter utter sh1t.
Under Adkins we were getting to HT regularly with not one shot on goal or have u forgotten that? Even at FT a lot of the games only had 1 or 2 attempts on goal. The players were despondent & not playing for him.
ORLY?
Adkins
Brum (A) - 16 shots
Bolton (H) - 18 shots
Norwich (A) - 6 shots
Cardiff (A) - 8 shots
Charlton (H) - 20 shots
Rovrum (H) - 13 shots
Blackburn (A) - 12 shots
Blackpool (H) - 16 shots
Average shots per game: 13.6
Clarke
Forest (H) - 11
Hudd (A) - 9
Ispwich (A) - 9
Wigan (H) - 15
Leeds (H) - 14
Wolves (A) - 17
Weds (H) - 12
Millwall - (A) - 17
Average shots per game: 13
Adkins - P24, F30, A39 = F1.25, A1.63 - PPG 1.19
Clarke - P16, F15, A18 = F0.94, A1.13 - PPG 1.25
E-Po isn't exactly right, but then neither are you. The defence has got better, but the attack has got worse and results are basically the same. Clarke has just got a single better cup results against Derby.
by MmmMonsterMunch » 01 Mar 2015 15:52
by Ian Royal » 01 Mar 2015 15:55
by MmmMonsterMunch » 01 Mar 2015 16:01
Ian Royal Just pointing out that your view is no more valid than E-Po's based on the facts
by Ian Royal » 01 Mar 2015 16:05
MmmMonsterMunchIan Royal Just pointing out that your view is no more valid than E-Po's based on the facts
Except the facts clearly show we have conceded less goals under Clarke than we did under Adkins and EP is claiming we concede more under Clarke. Ok then.
by melonhead » 01 Mar 2015 16:06
Ian Royal Just pointing out that your view is no more valid than E-Po's based on the facts.
Agree Brendy. But then I'd seriously question the signing of Yakubu as a replacement for Murray. At least Samuel / HRK / Blackman can actually run around for 90 minutes. Even if they're about as likely to score.
by MmmMonsterMunch » 01 Mar 2015 16:08
Ian RoyalMmmMonsterMunchIan Royal Just pointing out that your view is no more valid than E-Po's based on the facts
Except the facts clearly show we have conceded less goals under Clarke than we did under Adkins and EP is claiming we concede more under Clarke. Ok then.
And you claimed we scored more.
Like I said. Both of you are wrong.
by MmmMonsterMunch » 01 Mar 2015 16:09
by Baggie192 » 01 Mar 2015 16:55
TBMBaggie192sandman Is it because he didn't wear a cap with his tracksuit?
You may mock but we've only lost once since he came. It looks like you hired January to December 2013 Steve Clarke the tinkerman and unfortunately you haven't got Romelu Lukaku as a fail safe.
Pffff, but are you in the quarter final of the fa cup?
Actually no that doesn't work
by Extended-Phenotype » 01 Mar 2015 21:01
MmmMonsterMunchIan Royal Just pointing out that your view is no more valid than E-Po's based on the facts
Except the facts clearly show we have conceded less goals under Clarke than we did under Adkins and EP is claiming we concede more under Clarke. Ok then.
by Ian Royal » 01 Mar 2015 21:10
MmmMonsterMunch Where did I say we scored more Ian? Please find the quote.
MmmMonsterMunch Ah yes that's right. You can't. Because I didn't say it.
MmmMonsterMunchExtended-Phenotype He hasn't got a clue what he's doing. We are scoring less and now conceding more than under Adkins. We've been playing some of the worst football I've seen.
Absolutely ridiculous statement. Utter utter sh1t.
Under Adkins we were getting to HT regularly with not one shot on goal or have u forgotten that? Even at FT a lot of the games only had 1 or 2 attempts on goal. The players were despondent & not playing for him.
by sandman » 01 Mar 2015 21:21
by paultheroyal » 01 Mar 2015 21:32
Ian RoyalMmmMonsterMunch Where did I say we scored more Ian? Please find the quote.MmmMonsterMunch Ah yes that's right. You can't. Because I didn't say it.
ORLY?MmmMonsterMunchExtended-Phenotype He hasn't got a clue what he's doing. We are scoring less and now conceding more than under Adkins. We've been playing some of the worst football I've seen.
Absolutely ridiculous statement. Utter utter sh1t.
Under Adkins we were getting to HT regularly with not one shot on goal or have u forgotten that? Even at FT a lot of the games only had 1 or 2 attempts on goal. The players were despondent & not playing for him.
You haven't out right said it no, but by saying that E-Po is talking "utter utter sh1t" when he says the opposite and you then bang on (incorrectly) about us having very few shots under Adkins, which kinda by extension, when combined with the other element suggests you were saying we weren't scoring more under Adkins, which of course also means the same as we're scoring more under Clarke. Which I've just ably demonstrated is wrong.
Apologies if I've misunderstood your intent.
Oh and just in case by 'shots on goal' you meant 'shots on target' Adkins last three games were 5, 4, 6 compared to Clarke's 3, 3, 4
But enough of this silliness.
by Extended-Phenotype » 01 Mar 2015 22:17
sandman So you admit he didn't say it then? Don't know why you felt the need to type all that other stuff.
by MmmMonsterMunch » 01 Mar 2015 22:48
Ian Royal But enough of this silliness.
by leon » 01 Mar 2015 23:44
Ian RoyalMmmMonsterMunch Where did I say we scored more Ian? Please find the quote.MmmMonsterMunch Ah yes that's right. You can't. Because I didn't say it.
ORLY?MmmMonsterMunchExtended-Phenotype He hasn't got a clue what he's doing. We are scoring less and now conceding more than under Adkins. We've been playing some of the worst football I've seen.
Absolutely ridiculous statement. Utter utter sh1t.
Under Adkins we were getting to HT regularly with not one shot on goal or have u forgotten that? Even at FT a lot of the games only had 1 or 2 attempts on goal. The players were despondent & not playing for him.
You haven't out right said it no, but by saying that E-Po is talking "utter utter sh1t" when he says the opposite and you then bang on (incorrectly) about us having very few shots under Adkins, which kinda by extension, when combined with the other element suggests you were saying we weren't scoring more under Adkins, which of course also means the same as we're scoring more under Clarke. Which I've just ably demonstrated is wrong.
Apologies if I've misunderstood your intent.
Oh and just in case by 'shots on goal' you meant 'shots on target' Adkins last three games were 5, 4, 6 compared to Clarke's 3, 3, 4
But enough of this silliness.
by TBM » 02 Mar 2015 11:53
by Armadillo Roadkill » 02 Mar 2015 12:15
TBM We could be 21st (thats 4th bottom) by 10pm tomorrow night yet 171 of you are happy with Clarke.....
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 161 guests