by Snowball » 07 Mar 2015 09:19
by Mid Sussex Royal » 07 Mar 2015 16:17
by LUX » 07 Mar 2015 17:43
by Snowball » 07 Mar 2015 17:47
by Angry Shed Sex » 07 Mar 2015 17:51
Snowball Blackpool, Millwall, Wigan lose and remain 10 points behind RFC
but we now have a game in hand. Fulham lose 1-5 to finish in
fourth-bottom and now with a worst GD than RFC. And Huddersfield
lose (to Rotherham) and are just a point in front of us. Win or draw
our game in hand and we go above them.
Really excellent results to go with our 0-0 at Bradford
Reading now out to 50/1 to be relegated
by windermere_royal » 07 Mar 2015 17:52
by LUX » 07 Mar 2015 17:54
by Snowball » 07 Mar 2015 18:54
Angry Shed SexSnowball Blackpool, Millwall, Wigan lose and remain 10 points behind RFC
but we now have a game in hand. Fulham lose 1-5 to finish in
fourth-bottom and now with a worst GD than RFC. And Huddersfield
lose (to Rotherham) and are just a point in front of us. Win or draw
our game in hand and we go above them.
Really excellent results to go with our 0-0 at Bradford
Reading now out to 50/1 to be relegated
Please don't take this the wrong way, but have you actually seen us play lately?
by Snowball » 07 Mar 2015 19:03
by AthleticoSpizz » 07 Mar 2015 19:10
by sputnik » 07 Mar 2015 19:18
AthleticoSpizz Think you forgot to mention Rotherham v Wigan
by TBM » 07 Mar 2015 21:12
by paultheroyal » 07 Mar 2015 22:25
TBM Beating Brighton is a must
Rest players v Watford ready for Monday
by Angry Shed Sex » 08 Mar 2015 19:11
SnowballAngry Shed SexSnowball Blackpool, Millwall, Wigan lose and remain 10 points behind RFC
but we now have a game in hand. Fulham lose 1-5 to finish in
fourth-bottom and now with a worst GD than RFC. And Huddersfield
lose (to Rotherham) and are just a point in front of us. Win or draw
our game in hand and we go above them.
Really excellent results to go with our 0-0 at Bradford
Reading now out to 50/1 to be relegated
Please don't take this the wrong way, but have you actually seen us play lately?
Of course, and particularly, we are crap up front. But those sides have just ten games
to make up 10-11 points (and they play each other)
But, as an example, in the last two games (Bolton & Bradford) we needed to avoid defeat.
We did exactly that.
This is us away under Steve Clarke
DWLWDWWWLDD
W5 D4 L2 12-11
by Snowball » 08 Mar 2015 19:37
Angry Shed SexThis is us away under Steve Clarke
DWLWDWWWLDD
W5 D4 L2 12-11
In the league? I suppose I'm just relieved you're not including the U21's and U18's games in these 'statistics'
by Ian Royal » 08 Mar 2015 19:53
by Snowball » 08 Mar 2015 20:43
Ian Royal snowball, do you ever consider that when virtually everyone you're talking to is telling you that your stats shouldn't include cup games, perhaps you shouldn't include them, seeing as it's actually just hurting your argument by constantly being pointed out and the whole thing being rejected? Or do you just think, no damn it, 'the conversation must be on my terms!'
by Ian Royal » 08 Mar 2015 23:05
by Whatevs » 09 Mar 2015 00:20
by Snowball » 09 Mar 2015 07:44
Ian Royal Ok, so can you explain why, if the approach is the same and it's so relevant to include cup games, that the results without the cup games are so drastically different. I mean, bear in mind that you only get more cup games if you win, so by having multiple games to include, you're automatically skewing the results in a more positive manner than the affect would be if we'd lost the first one.
If we're so good away, why did we fail to beat Brighton, Millwall and Bolton, one of whom was down to 10 men, and lose to Fulham. Three of which are poor sides and one mediocre. Why did we beat Wednesday and Norwich, plus draw with M'bro at home - two good and one mediocre sides - if it's a simple question of rubbish at home, good away?
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 191 guests