by LWJ » 09 Mar 2015 11:46
by UpThePrem » 09 Mar 2015 11:51
CountryRoyalWest Stand Man It would be interesting to do a survey of drivers to see how many people understand how the cameras work. I watched a guy on the M4 today speeding well over the 50 limit and then slowing to about 50 for the camera.
Providing his average between the two cameras on any section was under 55mph he'd be fine, but the way your describing makes that sound unlikely.
I was always under the impression that's how they worked as apposed to just doing the limit at both cameras - which seems silly and little different from normal cameras.
by CountryRoyal » 09 Mar 2015 12:32
UpThePrem Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) guidelines for prosecution used to be 50 +10%+2mph so 57mph average speed. May have changed though.
by UpThePrem » 09 Mar 2015 12:42
CountryRoyalUpThePrem Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) guidelines for prosecution used to be 50 +10%+2mph so 57mph average speed. May have changed though.
Yeah I've always worked on that too (speed limit + 10% + 2mph), but there is a tiny bit more leniency at higher speeds - you're never going to get done at 80 on a motorway for example.
Strangely, in contrast to those guidelines, i know people who have sworn that they got caught doing 34 in a 30.
They might have also been full of shit.
by CountryRoyal » 09 Mar 2015 12:49
UpThePrem I was done a few moths ago on the Kings Road at 1am in the morning doing 34. Wife was done on Rushey Way doing 33.
by Yellowcoat » 09 Mar 2015 13:55
by Haag Royal » 09 Mar 2015 13:58
Yellowcoat I can also confirm being caught at 34 mph in Berkeley Avenue.
by itsonlyme » 09 Mar 2015 14:01
by Yellowcoat » 09 Mar 2015 14:05
by leww_rfc » 09 Mar 2015 14:07
by West Stand Man » 09 Mar 2015 19:07
CountryRoyalWest Stand Man It would be interesting to do a survey of drivers to see how many people understand how the cameras work. I watched a guy on the M4 today speeding well over the 50 limit and then slowing to about 50 for the camera.
Providing his average between the two cameras on any section was under 55mph he'd be fine, but the way your describing makes that sound unlikely.
I was always under the impression that's how they worked as apposed to just doing the limit at both cameras - which seems silly and little different from normal cameras.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Royals and Racers and 172 guests