Watford (A) match thread sponsored by Taylor and John

184 posts
seanboyd_2
Member
Posts: 361
Joined: 04 Oct 2014 16:10

Re: Watford (A) match thread sponsored by Taylor and John

by seanboyd_2 » 14 Mar 2015 16:51

Wait what? :o :o :o


Gordons Cumming
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5300
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 10:52
Location: All Good Things Come To An End

Re: Watford (A) match thread sponsored by Taylor and John

by Gordons Cumming » 14 Mar 2015 16:52

Reading have been forced to play a weakened team by the ridiculous fixture gods.

One of the most important games in our history on Monday have we have to play a game 2 days before.

Stupid.

If we get fined send me the bill and I'll pay it. :wink:
Last edited by Gordons Cumming on 14 Mar 2015 16:53, edited 1 time in total.

West Stand Man
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3106
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 08:37
Location: Working my nuts off during early retirement

Re: Watford (A) match thread sponsored by Taylor and John

by West Stand Man » 14 Mar 2015 16:53

Royal Ginger Noticing a pattern in the commentary.

Good pass from Karacan
Blackman receives the ball in the box
Heavy touch allows Watford to clear.

4-1. If i worked for Bournemouth or Boro i'd be on the phone to the Football League.


The FA and FL have cocd this one up royally. Insisting on the replay being played on Monday has set this up. They wouldn't have a legal leg to stand on if they tried to do anything about us fielding a 'weakened' team.

User avatar
tidus_mi2
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7408
Joined: 15 Jun 2012 15:24

Re: Watford (A) match thread sponsored by Taylor and John

by tidus_mi2 » 14 Mar 2015 16:53

In the interest of fair competition, shouldn't the Football League have done more to re-arrange this game?

kwik-silva
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1909
Joined: 11 Feb 2008 07:26

Re: Watford (A) match thread sponsored by Taylor and John

by kwik-silva » 14 Mar 2015 16:54

tidus_mi2 In the interest of fair competition, shouldn't the Football League have done more to re-arrange this game?


What's unfair about it? Bradford have played Saturday, Tuesday, Saturday, just like us.


West Stand Man
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3106
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 08:37
Location: Working my nuts off during early retirement

Re: Watford (A) match thread sponsored by Taylor and John

by West Stand Man » 14 Mar 2015 16:55

and Novakovic is on the pitch ....

Get ready for the orgy now!

higher
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2329
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:44
Location: cumbria

Re: Watford (A) match thread sponsored by Taylor and John

by higher » 14 Mar 2015 16:56

FT Bring on Parkyford.Exciting stuff :)

marlowuk
Member
Posts: 887
Joined: 18 Aug 2012 16:25

Re: Watford (A) match thread sponsored by Taylor and John

by marlowuk » 14 Mar 2015 16:56

Is the game over?

User avatar
tidus_mi2
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7408
Joined: 15 Jun 2012 15:24

Re: Watford (A) match thread sponsored by Taylor and John

by tidus_mi2 » 14 Mar 2015 16:57

kwik-silva
tidus_mi2 In the interest of fair competition, shouldn't the Football League have done more to re-arrange this game?


What's unfair about it? Bradford have played Saturday, Tuesday, Saturday, just like us.

Fair with regards to other teams, for example the teams also going for promotion and with regards to Bradford, the teams in the relegation fight as Notts County have gained a point they otherwise may not have gained.


User avatar
ZacNaloen
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7239
Joined: 13 Oct 2008 13:34
Location: 'If atheism is a religion, then bald is a hair color.' -Mark Schnitzius

Re: Watford (A) match thread sponsored by Taylor and John

by ZacNaloen » 14 Mar 2015 16:57

Much better/experienced/whatever teams have been absolutely hammered by Watford this season. So who cares.

10539.4 Miles Away
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1939
Joined: 23 Feb 2007 07:28
Location: Perth

Re: Watford (A) match thread sponsored by Taylor and John

by 10539.4 Miles Away » 14 Mar 2015 16:59

Got 2 of my judas bets. Karacan ruined my Watford by 4 or more though.

If we win on Monday then (barring the brave 1000 who went to watch today) no one will complain about today. Nice work Clarke.

windermere_royal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2453
Joined: 10 Sep 2006 16:25

Re: Watford (A) match thread sponsored by Taylor and John

by windermere_royal » 14 Mar 2015 17:00

In other news, Wigan win their 4th away game in a row. now they have Rotherham in their sights , if only they could win at home too

User avatar
tidus_mi2
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7408
Joined: 15 Jun 2012 15:24

Re: Watford (A) match thread sponsored by Taylor and John

by tidus_mi2 » 14 Mar 2015 17:00

To put it in perspective, promotion challengers Ipswich also lost 4-1 today.


10539.4 Miles Away
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1939
Joined: 23 Feb 2007 07:28
Location: Perth

Re: Watford (A) match thread sponsored by Taylor and John

by 10539.4 Miles Away » 14 Mar 2015 17:02

And can we now put the Chalobah myth to bed?

User avatar
urz13
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2058
Joined: 16 May 2011 20:37
Location: The following statement is false. The previous statement is true.

Re: Watford (A) match thread sponsored by Taylor and John

by urz13 » 14 Mar 2015 17:02

Mike Hunt
urz13 Watford were 5/6 with some bookies earlier today. As soon as I heard that the players on the team bus were mainly U/21s I stuck £60 on a Watford win - easiest £50 I'll ever make!


:lol: Nailed on Reading or Draw now.

8)

Man Friday
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2856
Joined: 20 Nov 2005 13:45

Re: Watford (A) match thread sponsored by Taylor and John

by Man Friday » 14 Mar 2015 17:26

Agree with Clarke's approach but dispels his contention that the League's the priority!!!

And pigs fly.

seanboyd_2
Member
Posts: 361
Joined: 04 Oct 2014 16:10

Re: Watford (A) match thread sponsored by Taylor and John

by seanboyd_2 » 14 Mar 2015 17:30

Man Friday Agree with Clarke's approach but dispels his contention that the League's the priority!!!

And pigs fly.




What?

Bob1871
Member
Posts: 99
Joined: 22 Oct 2014 15:06

Re: Watford (A) match thread sponsored by Taylor and John

by Bob1871 » 14 Mar 2015 17:32

Anderson - 6 distribution was pretty poor
Keown - 6 needs to bulk out a bit, was getting out muscled too easily
Knight - 7 looked pretty solid
Cooper - 7 looked pretty solid
Travner - 6 was going down far too easily and always looking for a foul
Stacey- see Keown
Guthrie - 3 complete waste of space, middle 2 gave defence no protection
Akpan - 4 see Guthrie
Taylor - 5 got in some good positions but touch and final ball was awful
Cox - 5 offered very little
Yakubu - 5 see Cox

Blackman - 6 looked more dangerous than Cox or Yak
Karacan - 8 scored a great goal and played well, broke it up well in midfield and spread the play well

Overall a bad day out, but worth pointing out that if the ten changes it was our more experienced players that were poor, youngsters played ok.

Royalwaster
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3637
Joined: 13 Jul 2004 13:32

Re: Watford (A) match thread sponsored by Taylor and John

by Royalwaster » 14 Mar 2015 17:55

Bob1871 Anderson - 6 distribution was pretty poor
Keown - 6 needs to bulk out a bit, was getting out muscled too easily
Knight - 7 looked pretty solid
Cooper - 7 looked pretty solid
Travner - 6 was going down far too easily and always looking for a foul
Stacey- see Keown
Guthrie - 3 complete waste of space, middle 2 gave defence no protection
Akpan - 4 see Guthrie
Taylor - 5 got in some good positions but touch and final ball was awful
Cox - 5 offered very little
Yakubu - 5 see Cox

Blackman - 6 looked more dangerous than Cox or Yak
Karacan - 8 scored a great goal and played well, broke it up well in midfield and spread the play well

Overall a bad day out, but worth pointing out that if the ten changes it was our more experienced players that were poor, youngsters played ok.


You could hardly call Knight a youngster could you! :D

User avatar
PistolPete
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1345
Joined: 01 Mar 2005 06:38
Location: 1871

Re: Watford (A) match thread sponsored by Taylor and John

by PistolPete » 14 Mar 2015 17:59

Bob1871 Anderson - 6 distribution was pretty poor
Keown - 6 needs to bulk out a bit, was getting out muscled too easily
Knight - 7 looked pretty solid
Cooper - 7 looked pretty solid
Travner - 6 was going down far too easily and always looking for a foul
Stacey- see Keown
Guthrie - 3 complete waste of space, middle 2 gave defence no protection
Akpan - 4 see Guthrie
Taylor - 5 got in some good positions but touch and final ball was awful
Cox - 5 offered very little
Yakubu - 5 see Cox

Blackman - 6 looked more dangerous than Cox or Yak
Karacan - 8 scored a great goal and played well, broke it up well in midfield and spread the play well

Overall a bad day out, but worth pointing out that if the ten changes it was our more experienced players that were poor, youngsters played ok.


:shock: :shock:

Centre backs solid?!?!?!

Cooper had the worst game he will ever have. Poor guy got an ironic cheer for passing to his own player and you say solid?! Knight headed the ball in ever direction but the one he should have, was never once in control of his legs either. Shambles. Poor Keown needed help with Deeney and forrestieri and got NONE!

Guthrie looked a proper player, sliding into tackles, looking for passes, just a bit rusty.

Karacan looked good, very happy for him.

Blackman was poor but much better than cox. amazing.

Taylor was very poor too.

Stay a little overawed but grew into the game.

184 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 245 guests

It is currently 26 Nov 2024 17:47