by Angry Shed Sex » 21 Apr 2015 09:55
by Angry Shed Sex » 21 Apr 2015 09:57
by Sanguine » 21 Apr 2015 09:57
MmmMonsterMunch The knives are well & truly out for him now. Was reading some forums yesterday and most comments were "Talks a good game but no substance", "the players had no idea what they were supposed to be doing", "death by football" & also referring to his dossier of tactics.
All sounds so very familiar.
by Pepe the Horseman » 21 Apr 2015 10:21
SanguineMmmMonsterMunch The knives are well & truly out for him now. Was reading some forums yesterday and most comments were "Talks a good game but no substance", "the players had no idea what they were supposed to be doing", "death by football" & also referring to his dossier of tactics.
All sounds so very familiar.
Trophy-less, sure. But there wasn't a single Liverpool fan claiming the players had no idea what they were doing when they finished 2nd last season. Nor indeed when they went unbeaten for 12 games recently when Rodgers switched to 3-4-3.
Fickle fans. Rodgers is a very good manager.
by TBM » 21 Apr 2015 11:28
SanguineMmmMonsterMunch The knives are well & truly out for him now. Was reading some forums yesterday and most comments were "Talks a good game but no substance", "the players had no idea what they were supposed to be doing", "death by football" & also referring to his dossier of tactics.
All sounds so very familiar.
Trophy-less, sure. But there wasn't a single Liverpool fan claiming the players had no idea what they were doing when they finished 2nd last season. Nor indeed when they went unbeaten for 12 games recently when Rodgers switched to 3-4-3.
Fickle fans. Rodgers is a very good manager.
by Sanguine » 21 Apr 2015 11:44
TBMSanguineMmmMonsterMunch The knives are well & truly out for him now. Was reading some forums yesterday and most comments were "Talks a good game but no substance", "the players had no idea what they were supposed to be doing", "death by football" & also referring to his dossier of tactics.
All sounds so very familiar.
Trophy-less, sure. But there wasn't a single Liverpool fan claiming the players had no idea what they were doing when they finished 2nd last season. Nor indeed when they went unbeaten for 12 games recently when Rodgers switched to 3-4-3.
Fickle fans. Rodgers is a very good manager.
I don't think Rodgers is a good manager - he's a good coach, but as a manager i'm just not sure...
by Angry Shed Sex » 21 Apr 2015 13:07
by Handsome Man » 21 Apr 2015 13:34
Angry Shed Sex I didn't realise Rodgers has spent over 200 million on 24 players. That's shocking and really can't continue. I recon he's got 4 or 5 good ones out of that.
At best.
by genome » 21 Apr 2015 14:45
by MmmMonsterMunch » 21 Apr 2015 18:37
by Angry Shed Sex » 21 Apr 2015 23:30
Handsome ManAngry Shed Sex I didn't realise Rodgers has spent over 200 million on 24 players. That's shocking and really can't continue. I recon he's got 4 or 5 good ones out of that.
At best.
This is par for big clubs. It's probably not to different to Man U and Chelsea, a bit better than Spurs and City and not as good as Arsenal. Most incoming transfers are rubbish.
by Extended-Phenotype » 22 Apr 2015 08:49
by Sanguine » 22 Apr 2015 09:14
Angry Shed Sex
However, of the players signed in Rodgers tenure none of them have pulled up any trees. Coutinho currently being the best of the lot. Allen, Borini, Ballotelli, Llallana, Lovren, Lambert and Mignolet - you can't say they've performed as expected.
I didn't realise Rodgers has spent over 200 million on 24 players. That's shocking and really can't continue. I recon he's got 4 or 5 good ones out of that.
At best.
by Whatevs » 22 Apr 2015 12:50
Handsome ManAngry Shed Sex I didn't realise Rodgers has spent over 200 million on 24 players. That's shocking and really can't continue. I recon he's got 4 or 5 good ones out of that.
At best.
This is par for big clubs. It's probably not to different to Man U and Chelsea, a bit better than Spurs and City and not as good as Arsenal. Most incoming transfers are rubbish.
by jd82 » 22 Apr 2015 13:12
Whatevs where
by Angry Shed Sex » 22 Apr 2015 16:01
SanguineAngry Shed Sex
However, of the players signed in Rodgers tenure none of them have pulled up any trees. Coutinho currently being the best of the lot. Allen, Borini, Ballotelli, Llallana, Lovren, Lambert and Mignolet - you can't say they've performed as expected.
I didn't realise Rodgers has spent over 200 million on 24 players. That's shocking and really can't continue. I recon he's got 4 or 5 good ones out of that.
At best.
Was Sturridge a Rodgers signing too?
But in general yes, his signings haven't generally proven brilliant. But then that's what you get when you establish a policy of signing potential over proven talent, and that's the approach of FSG as much as Rodgers. In Sakho and Markovic and Can they have three of Europe's most promising young players. Liverpool aren't in the league of being able to buy 21/22 year olds who will slot straight into the team and perform every week.
I dunno - I'm a bit of a football romantic and like managers being given time to 'build' something; would love Monk, for example, to stay at Swansea, the team he captained, and build that squad into a European challenge. But I expect him to go to Newcastle in the summer. I'm not convinced any manager would have achieved more than Rodgers has in his time at the club, give or take a (relatively) meaningless cup win. Nearly winning the title last season, from a base of 7th place, was no mean feat.
by Angry Shed Sex » 22 Apr 2015 16:03
WhatevsHandsome ManAngry Shed Sex I didn't realise Rodgers has spent over 200 million on 24 players. That's shocking and really can't continue. I recon he's got 4 or 5 good ones out of that.
At best.
This is par for big clubs. It's probably not to different to Man U and Chelsea, a bit better than Spurs and City and not as good as Arsenal. Most incoming transfers are rubbish.
United have pretty much gone back to Fergie's team with a few additions and have been pretty successful recently. If LVG was being judged on his signings he'd be in the same boat as Brendan
Shaw - 30 million
AdM - 60 million
Falcao - 40 million (if signed)
Rojo - 17 million
Shaw has been injured but the others have been pretty gash and deservedly sat on the bench. Blind has been the only good* signing for LVG. Mata, Fellaini & Herrarra (identified by Fergie) where Moyes signings
by Whatevs » 22 Apr 2015 17:09
Angry Shed SexWhatevsHandsome Man
This is par for big clubs. It's probably not to different to Man U and Chelsea, a bit better than Spurs and City and not as good as Arsenal. Most incoming transfers are rubbish.
United have pretty much gone back to Fergie's team with a few additions and have been pretty successful recently. If LVG was being judged on his signings he'd be in the same boat as Brendan
Shaw - 30 million
AdM - 60 million
Falcao - 40 million (if signed)
Rojo - 17 million
Shaw has been injured but the others have been pretty gash and deservedly sat on the bench. Blind has been the only good* signing for LVG. Mata, Fellaini & Herrarra (identified by Fergie) where Moyes signings
Harsh to add Falcao in there - he's not made the grade at United and doesn't appear to be in a position when a contract will be offered.
I'm not a Rojo lover but I think Shaw and AdM are good signings.
by Coppelled_Streets » 23 Apr 2015 12:39
Users browsing this forum: Harrison Delbridge, Hendo, Silver Fox and 82 guests