by Snowball » 24 May 2015 00:10
by Snowball » 24 May 2015 00:13
SCIAG
Neither of Arsenal's goals were scored at the near post
by SCIAG » 24 May 2015 00:47
SnowballSCIAG
Neither of Arsenal's goals were scored at the near post
!!
by Snowball » 24 May 2015 09:17
by urz13 » 24 May 2015 09:54
by Silver Fox » 24 May 2015 10:15
blueroyals HRK voted worst player of the season, is second highest earner
by winchester_royal » 24 May 2015 12:47
urz13 Feds doesn't have a near post problem. All keepers concede goals there. A 'problem' would be conceding 5+ a season that he should have otherwise saved IMO. He doesn't do that
by blueroyals » 24 May 2015 13:22
Silver Foxblueroyals HRK voted worst player of the season, is second highest earner
When was this vote?
by Ian Royal » 24 May 2015 13:31
by Za Vas » 24 May 2015 13:43
by winchester_royal » 24 May 2015 15:43
Ian Royal The only argument about Bibbo's quality appears to be that he didn't eradicate all weaknesses in our keeper's game.
But you'd have to be an idiot not to see the improvement in Feds from when he was second to Hahnemann and where he is now.
Likewise McCarthy's kicking was diabolical when he started, by the time he left it was merely bad.
Bibbo has worked with Hahnemann, Federici, Hamer and McCarthy, all played at the top level. Three of them he helped develop.
The only logical reason for this move is that the problem Clarke's identified is that the players and coaches are too matey.
Well I'd rather he identified the obvious weak spots in our squad and dealt with the coasters, rather than devoting time to replacing an excellent GK coach and finding a new kit man ffs.
by Ian Royal » 24 May 2015 17:33
by Hendo » 24 May 2015 17:35
by Ian Royal » 24 May 2015 17:42
Hendo If Bibbo was that good, why was he at Reading for so long?
by winchester_royal » 24 May 2015 17:54
Ian Royal I think we can make an informed judgement given our relative success during his time here, particularly in the goalkeeping department. And the fact multiple managers have kept him on.
The evidence in favour of Bibbo being good at his job for us is a fukton greater than Clarke, who's got sweet FA stored in the bank of positives.
If there isn't someone new announced fairly quickly because Clarke has someone lined up it just looks more and more like he hasn't got a clue. It's not like he's new and untested. He's been with us for half a season of shitness.
And if kit men so easy to find and insignificant why bother switching.
by Royal Rother » 24 May 2015 17:58
winchester_royalurz13 Feds doesn't have a near post problem. All keepers concede goals there. A 'problem' would be conceding 5+ a season that he should have otherwise saved IMO. He doesn't do that
I disagree. But that's not really the point anyway.
The point is that not a single one of us knows how good Bibbo was as a coach. We have no idea how much better/worse our keepers might have been if they'd been coached by someone else. There is simply no way of telling.
Likewise we don't know the kind of atmosphere that the club had behind the scenes last season. We were all making comments about the fact that something seemed 'rotten' in terms of players attitude and the general feeling around the club. For all we know the guys who lost their jobs weren't creating the right kind of environment.
Clarke has come in tasked with clearing out the deadwood and rejuvenating the club. That involves people being moved on both on and off the pitch. He will have a far better idea than us about the respective qualities of the coaches and is in a much better place to make those decisions.
If it doesn't work then Clarke will rightly take the blame, but until we see the results of this shake up it is frankly ridiculous to start calling for his head.
Ian Royal The only logical reason for this move is that the problem Clarke's identified is that the players and coaches are too matey.
by Ian Royal » 24 May 2015 18:30
by Hendo » 24 May 2015 18:57
Ian RoyalHendo If Bibbo was that good, why was he at Reading for so long?
This would be the Reading that have consistently been one of the best 30 sides in the country for the majority of his time here?
by Uke » 24 May 2015 18:58
winchester_royalIan Royal I think we can make an informed judgement given our relative success during his time here, particularly in the goalkeeping department. And the fact multiple managers have kept him on.
The evidence in favour of Bibbo being good at his job for us is a fukton greater than Clarke, who's got sweet FA stored in the bank of positives.
If there isn't someone new announced fairly quickly because Clarke has someone lined up it just looks more and more like he hasn't got a clue. It's not like he's new and untested. He's been with us for half a season of shitness.
And if kit men so easy to find and insignificant why bother switching.
You're clearly not getting the point so I won't bother again.
And I didn't say kitmen were insignificant - don't put words in my mouth - Ron Grant had a massive impact at the club. I just don't think it will distract anyone from the strengthening of the team.
Anyone who has worked in any team will tell you that the attitude of every single person will have an impact on that team. Kit men are part of that dressing room and if for what ever reason they aren't doing a good job then the decision to change is absolutely right and I can't believe it's something that you feel able to cast judgement on as you have absolutely no idea what goes on in that dressing room.
by TFF » 24 May 2015 19:33
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 244 guests