Norfolk Royal Strap's scenario is improbable and a bit apocalyptic and the truth about the Thai owners probably lies further towards the side of being beneficial to the club than destroying it.
The new owners are property developers essentially as that seems to be where the majority of their money comes from.
The lady owner is on record I think as saying she wants to turn the M4 corridor town into a 'little London.'
So how do they achieve that? Buy a football club in a part of the town which has excellent transport links, a new station planned, and plenty of room for development. Those boxes ticked.
But how do they achieve the partnership with local councils and decision makers that could make their dream a reality.
They make contacts, and the biggest player here is SJM obviously, who can open doors for them, as they are new to the area and its foibles politically and socially.
So far so good, all boxes ticked. But, and it's a big but, to do this their PR and continued acquiescence of both SJM and the local council would depend to a large extent on whether their plans were good for the area and the town.
Asset stripping the local football club would not win them friends, it would make them enemies and make their Little London dream a nightmare.
If they are cute business people they will know this. They will also know that there are vast financial rewards now for promotion to the Premiership, and more doors opening with new contacts.
I don't think it's true that they have not put money into the club so far. They have bought it for a pretty penny for a start, and secured the debts I think.
My guess is that the club will continue to be run on the frugal side but there will be money available to ensure a team that has at least a chance of getting into the Premiership. Time will tell of course.
Sure, but if they relocate us into a modern "community statdium with good rail links, they could argue it was a stadium fit for our size and ambition, and would create a better atmosphere/fan experience with 5000 crowds in an 8000 capacity stadium, rather than 5000 lonely souls rattling around the MadStad. Build the new stadium, (which at the size I am suggestsing would cost no more than a few million tops), in advance of an outline planning permission for the area, with the MadSatd still being used by a successful PL rugby team as tenant on a yearly rolling basis, and it will be very easy to say they are doing the best for the football club. As soon as the new stadium is in use, don;t renew the rugby tenancy, and in a year the bulldozers will move in.
They wouldn't make any planning apllpication for the area whilst this chnageover was taking place, but use the tranition year to put together their property plans and submit the application once we were into the second year of our new stadium.
RBC would simply love the application, redeveloping a relatively underdeveloped area, removing football traffic from the A33, and of course don;t forget the tens of millions they could extort from the develpoer via Section 106 "agreements" - or Community Infrastructure Levy as it is known.
Sadly, the more I let my deranged mind go down this route, the more perturbed I am at just how simple such a plan becomes.
Fingers crossed I am totally deluded and that sanity will return to Chez Strap in the not too distant future!