by Ian Royal » 12 Sep 2015 17:20
by West Stand Man » 12 Sep 2015 19:21
Ian Royal From the highlights I can't tell whether we were playing 4-4-2 with Quinn on the left and Blackman on the right, or 4-3-3. It looked like a fairly free shape shifting between the two as necessary.
Can anyone clarify?
by Ian Royal » 12 Sep 2015 20:47
West Stand ManIan Royal From the highlights I can't tell whether we were playing 4-4-2 with Quinn on the left and Blackman on the right, or 4-3-3. It looked like a fairly free shape shifting between the two as necessary.
Can anyone clarify?
It looked to me as if we were 4-3-3 when in possession and that either Vydra or Blackman dropped back to make it 4-4-2 when we lost the ball. It was, however pretty flexible and we seemed to be defending with 4-3-3 on occasions.
by Royal Rother » 13 Sep 2015 08:33
genome I take back what I said about him needing a season in League One. He looks the business at this level.
by Steve_Upper_West » 13 Sep 2015 08:49
Ian RoyalWest Stand ManIan Royal From the highlights I can't tell whether we were playing 4-4-2 with Quinn on the left and Blackman on the right, or 4-3-3. It looked like a fairly free shape shifting between the two as necessary.
Can anyone clarify?
It looked to me as if we were 4-3-3 when in possession and that either Vydra or Blackman dropped back to make it 4-4-2 when we lost the ball. It was, however pretty flexible and we seemed to be defending with 4-3-3 on occasions.
Pleased to see I could pick that up from the highlights, and particularly pleased to see we seem to have a team that can use it's own initiative in a fluid shape. I wonder if we'll go for a more conservative 4-5-1 or 4-4-2 away.
by Pepe the Horseman » 13 Sep 2015 10:28
Royal Rothergenome I take back what I said about him needing a season in League One. He looks the business at this level.
Begs the question as to whether that crop of youngsters might all look the business at this level given a proper chance.
by genome » 13 Sep 2015 11:25
by Ian Royal » 13 Sep 2015 11:52
Pepe the HorsemanRoyal Rothergenome I take back what I said about him needing a season in League One. He looks the business at this level.
Begs the question as to whether that crop of youngsters might all look the business at this level given a proper chance.
Or maybe the reason he looks the business is because he had a very successful loan last season which has helped him step up.
by SCIAG » 13 Sep 2015 11:59
Royal Rothergenome I take back what I said about him needing a season in League One. He looks the business at this level.
Begs the question as to whether that crop of youngsters might all look the business at this level given a proper chance.
by Sutekh » 13 Sep 2015 15:51
SCIAGRoyal Rothergenome I take back what I said about him needing a season in League One. He looks the business at this level.
Begs the question as to whether that crop of youngsters might all look the business at this level given a proper chance.
All? No. Front six? Probably, yes.
I know there's a lot of fretting that if we don't go up then we'll lose Vydra, but Tanner, Fosu, Novakovich and Stacey will all have another year of development behind them. They could all have slotted in on Friday and sparkled. Get two of them playing the Vydra/Blackman role and Samuel or Liburd in Sa's place and we'd look very good. Put Kuhl in for Norwood and maybe Tanner in for Quinn...
Kevin Keen said at the fans forum that there are half a dozen players in the U21s who he thinks could play 100 matches for us, and I'm inclined to agree.
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 130 guests