Swegrebnyak420XIan RoyalSwegrebnyak420X It's AQA.
Cheers
I can't comment on players I've never seen like Friday, Death or Senior etc. But of those I've seen over the last 20 years a few stand out.
In goal.
Shaka and Hahnemann. Shaka went on to have a successful career at the top of English football and Hahnemann played successfully at the highest level with us.
In defence.
Wdowczyk, Ingimarsson and Shorey. Wdowczyk was a real classy centreback with a good range of passing, anticipated really well. Ingimarsson was just solid all round and Shorey, well he got an England cap and was at the heart of everything that was good about the 106ers (and then bad about it).
In midfield.
Little, Gilkes, Parkinson and Sidwell. Sidwell went on to spend a long time in the PL and was the driving force at the heart of the 106ers. Little wasn't quick but his close control was almost unbelievable at times and he could pick out a player with a cross to perfection. Gilkes was really quick, and before my time was a deadly winger... though I think we've had plenty wingers better since, he is a club legend so deserves a mention. Parky is far from the best player, but for all his limitations he would run through walls for the team and the fact that the fans still sing about him now speaks volumes.
Upfront.
Kitson and Quinn scored lots of goals and were talented players. If Kitson hadn't been as loath to put the effort in in training as he was and did more to keep his body from breaking down in injury as much and as often, I think he'd have played a fair few games for England.
But when it comes down to it, the greatest, best, most talented player I've seen for Reading is Sigurdsson. The skill of Little, the freekicks of Shorey and the goalscoring ability of Kitson. If Friday has that beat, he was a hellova player.
This is so helpful, Ian, thanks.
My own vote would have to be Sigurdsson from my time, just for pure skill.
Good luck, and make sure you know and understand the learning objectives and marking criteria.
These sorts of courses aren't always as well understood as more traditional general qualifications in terms of what the expectations of the exam board is. And that includes by the tutors in some unfortunate cases. My limited understand is it's often as much, if not more, about the how you manage and investigate and organise the project than what you actually produce at the end.