genome No-one has retracted his appointment. He's still the favourite and is still expected to take over.
Yes, but it's not a certainty anymore and that has given space for alot of negativity to come out.
by Top Flight » 11 Dec 2015 14:08
genome No-one has retracted his appointment. He's still the favourite and is still expected to take over.
by Winston Smith » 11 Dec 2015 14:13
genome No-one has retracted his appointment. He's still the favourite and is still expected to take over.
by CountryRoyal » 11 Dec 2015 14:14
Top Flightgenome No-one has retracted his appointment. He's still the favourite and is still expected to take over.
Yes, but it's not a certainty anymore and that has given space for alot of negativity to come out.
by genome » 11 Dec 2015 14:15
by windermere_royal » 11 Dec 2015 14:21
by Elm Park Kid » 11 Dec 2015 14:53
by RG7Fan » 11 Dec 2015 15:03
Elm Park Kid So. . . . . reading between the lines a bit it sounds like Brian was provisionally offered the job, accepted and then one of the owners objected. So now the owners have 'reopened' the decision and are trying to come to a consensus.
I've got to say, if that is what happened then McDermott must be an absolute saint to put up with it (though we knew that already).
by CountryRoyal » 11 Dec 2015 15:14
Elm Park Kid So. . . . . reading between the lines a bit it sounds like Brian was provisionally offered the job, accepted and then one of the owners objected. So now the owners have 'reopened' the decision and are trying to come to a consensus.
I've got to say, if that is what happened then McDermott must be an absolute saint to put up with it (though we knew that already).
by tonyrfc » 11 Dec 2015 16:11
by Nameless » 11 Dec 2015 16:19
Elm Park Kid So. . . . . reading between the lines a bit it sounds like Brian was provisionally offered the job, accepted and then one of the owners objected. So now the owners have 'reopened' the decision and are trying to come to a consensus.
I've got to say, if that is what happened then McDermott must be an absolute saint to put up with it (though we knew that already).
by One8Seven1* » 11 Dec 2015 16:33
by RoyalBlue » 11 Dec 2015 18:00
Top FlightTop Flight Finally he has allowed one question through on his conduct:
These questions posed by some bloke called Green
"Do you feel getreading's credibility has taken a battering this week? To what extent do you scrutinise your sources before "breaking" a story?"
Check this out for his response:
"@Green: Not at all. You honestly think I would go with a story like that if I wasn't totally convinced it was happening. Sometimes things change that are out of your control. Trust me, when I published that story everyone, right to the top of the club, were expecting Brian to appointed later that day."
by JIM » 11 Dec 2015 18:40
by windermere_royal » 11 Dec 2015 19:24
JIM IN OUT IN OUT Wait till Saturday. This saga is nearly as good as Fulham and CLARKE. Seriously with all due respect for Brian I think this is not a positive step forward. but the decision is out of the supporters hands.
by Royal Rother » 11 Dec 2015 20:01
CountryRoyalTop Flightgenome No-one has retracted his appointment. He's still the favourite and is still expected to take over.
Yes, but it's not a certainty anymore and that has given space for alot of negativity to come out.
Only for knee-jerking, knicker-twisting, hormonal basket cases.
For those with a modicum of sanity I think we just take a back seat and let them get on it with it.
by Lower West » 11 Dec 2015 20:34
windermere_royalJIM IN OUT IN OUT Wait till Saturday. This saga is nearly as good as Fulham and CLARKE. Seriously with all due respect for Brian I think this is not a positive step forward. but the decision is out of the supporters hands.
The voice of reason. how long before people realise he`s not actually the messiah? big backward step for me.
by MmmMonsterMunch » 11 Dec 2015 21:25
genome I called it on page 20genome If that is the case then it was clearly just an error - perhaps they had got the article ready for publication but accidentally published it. Also, not sure how much you could blame Charles for that, seeing as he wasn't actually working...
by MmmMonsterMunch » 11 Dec 2015 21:26
by genome » 11 Dec 2015 22:19
MmmMonsterMunchgenome I called it on page 20genome If that is the case then it was clearly just an error - perhaps they had got the article ready for publication but accidentally published it. Also, not sure how much you could blame Charles for that, seeing as he wasn't actually working...
I called it on page 14.....
by sandman » 12 Dec 2015 09:15
windermere_royalJIM IN OUT IN OUT Wait till Saturday. This saga is nearly as good as Fulham and CLARKE. Seriously with all due respect for Brian I think this is not a positive step forward. but the decision is out of the supporters hands.
The voice of reason. how long before people realise he`s not actually the messiah? big backward step for me.
Users browsing this forum: adambs2000, Four Of Clubs, Google [Bot] and 226 guests