by PieEater » 13 Dec 2015 11:15
by Westwood52 » 13 Dec 2015 11:22
Doyleh Given that the worst player on the field today probably earns more in a month than I can earn in a couple of years, every single person playing should take a long hard look at their commitment to the club and decide whether they want to play or to coast. This was a game to blot out of the memory.
Tickets at £24 each plus the cost of travel and I wonder whether any of these pampered gits understand just what it means to pay out that sort of money for the misery endured today. Reading were appalling - lackadaisical, unmotivated, arrogant and stupid. Get with the plot guys and start to earn the money and the salary I pay for.
I wouldn't have minded losing quite so much if the team had actually played a half decent game of football but alas ....
A friend of mine has started to watch rugby and the Bracknell bees because the cost is less and the entertainment so much better. The more I think about that, the more appealing it gets.
At least it had stopped raining by the time we left
by genome » 13 Dec 2015 11:29
by strap » 13 Dec 2015 11:33
by RoyalBlue » 13 Dec 2015 11:35
genome Interesting* that we only named 5 loanees yesterday, no sign of Piazon. Injured, or dropped entirely?
by genome » 13 Dec 2015 11:53
by Extended-Phenotype » 13 Dec 2015 12:30
by Ian Royal » 13 Dec 2015 12:51
Extended-Phenotype Kinda bored of this tippy-tappy vs diect football stand-off, like picking one or the other is in someway ignorant about how football works. There are obviously benefits to both philosophies and you don't have to be exclusive to just one.
Teams who don't score with tippy-tappy aren't guaranteed to score if they go direct, either. And teams who opt for direct football aren't necessarily going to be dull to watch or technically inferior.
The point is not tippy-tappy vs direct in what produces results - its a team having purpose with either: you can't just pass it around and expect to win and you equally can't just kick it aimlessly towards goal and expect score.
Neither philosophy is naturally wrong, if a team lacks intent and purpose, it doesn't matter what tactics you adopt, you will fail.
by Lower West » 13 Dec 2015 12:58
PieEater and thanks to a homer ref got a dodgy penalty and that was it.
by Lower West » 13 Dec 2015 13:09
loyalroyaldaz Team were very average indeed.
Vydra was our best player today for me.
GMac worked hard as well.
The rest for me were clueless and some just looked like they couldnt give a toss.
No Manager to play for on the bench may not have helped but for me personal pride should get a squad like we have a result against Preston.
Half of out fans were a fukking discrace.
Booing and slagging off our own team from almost the beginning and abusing them verbally at full time.
Embarrassed to be amongst them.
by Rea Ding » 13 Dec 2015 15:00
loyalroyaldaz Just got home to Reading.
Awful Game
Awful Weather
Awful Road out of Deepdale
Team were very average indeed.
Vydra was our best player today for me.
GMac worked hard as well.
The rest for me were clueless and some just looked like they couldnt give a toss.
No Manager to play for on the bench may not have helped but for me personal pride should get a squad like we have a result against Preston.
Half of out fans were a fukking discrace.
Booing and slagging off our own team from almost the beginning and abusing them verbally at full time.
Embarrassed to be amongst them.
by Extended-Phenotype » 13 Dec 2015 15:27
by Dick Habbin's hairdo » 13 Dec 2015 15:42
Extended-Phenotype Kinda bored of this tippy-tappy vs diect football stand-off, like picking one or the other is in someway ignorant about how football works. There are obviously benefits to both philosophies and you don't have to be exclusive to just one.
Teams who don't score with tippy-tappy aren't guaranteed to score if they go direct, either. And teams who opt for direct football aren't necessarily going to be dull to watch or technically inferior.
The point is not tippy-tappy vs direct in what produces results - its a team having purpose with either: you can't just pass it around and expect to win and you equally can't just kick it aimlessly towards goal and expect score.
Neither philosophy is naturally wrong, if a team lacks intent and purpose, it doesn't matter what tactics you adopt, you will fail.
by bobby1413 » 13 Dec 2015 16:27
Dick Habbin's hairdoExtended-Phenotype Kinda bored of this tippy-tappy vs diect football stand-off, like picking one or the other is in someway ignorant about how football works. There are obviously benefits to both philosophies and you don't have to be exclusive to just one.
Teams who don't score with tippy-tappy aren't guaranteed to score if they go direct, either. And teams who opt for direct football aren't necessarily going to be dull to watch or technically inferior.
The point is not tippy-tappy vs direct in what produces results - its a team having purpose with either: you can't just pass it around and expect to win and you equally can't just kick it aimlessly towards goal and expect score.
Neither philosophy is naturally wrong, if a team lacks intent and purpose, it doesn't matter what tactics you adopt, you will fail.
Oh, just stop it. Stop it now. Stop being so oxf*rd sensible. You'll be outed as a *shudder* 'Team Boarder'.
I guess the vast majority of fans don't care whether it's tippy-tappy or hoofball - they just want to win.
by CountryRoyal » 13 Dec 2015 17:03
bobby1413Dick Habbin's hairdoExtended-Phenotype Kinda bored of this tippy-tappy vs diect football stand-off, like picking one or the other is in someway ignorant about how football works. There are obviously benefits to both philosophies and you don't have to be exclusive to just one.
Teams who don't score with tippy-tappy aren't guaranteed to score if they go direct, either. And teams who opt for direct football aren't necessarily going to be dull to watch or technically inferior.
The point is not tippy-tappy vs direct in what produces results - its a team having purpose with either: you can't just pass it around and expect to win and you equally can't just kick it aimlessly towards goal and expect score.
Neither philosophy is naturally wrong, if a team lacks intent and purpose, it doesn't matter what tactics you adopt, you will fail.
Oh, just stop it. Stop it now. Stop being so oxf*rd sensible. You'll be outed as a *shudder* 'Team Boarder'.
I guess the vast majority of fans don't care whether it's tippy-tappy or hoofball - they just want to win.
Call me mental ...
But I don't actually care about a win at the minute. What I do want is 11 players who give their heart and soul every match. Never stop running, trying and trying again.
What I saw at forest and QPR was passionless, devoid of any spirit.
by BonBoh » 13 Dec 2015 17:09
CountryRoyal All anybody did was bitch and moan at each other, point fingers and lay blame.
by RG7Fan » 13 Dec 2015 17:25
bobby1413Dick Habbin's hairdoExtended-Phenotype Kinda bored of this tippy-tappy vs diect football stand-off, like picking one or the other is in someway ignorant about how football works. There are obviously benefits to both philosophies and you don't have to be exclusive to just one.
Teams who don't score with tippy-tappy aren't guaranteed to score if they go direct, either. And teams who opt for direct football aren't necessarily going to be dull to watch or technically inferior.
The point is not tippy-tappy vs direct in what produces results - its a team having purpose with either: you can't just pass it around and expect to win and you equally can't just kick it aimlessly towards goal and expect score.
Neither philosophy is naturally wrong, if a team lacks intent and purpose, it doesn't matter what tactics you adopt, you will fail.
Oh, just stop it. Stop it now. Stop being so oxf*rd sensible. You'll be outed as a *shudder* 'Team Boarder'.
I guess the vast majority of fans don't care whether it's tippy-tappy or hoofball - they just want to win.
Call me mental ...
But I don't actually care about a win at the minute. What I do want is 11 players who give their heart and soul every match. Never stop running, trying and trying again.
What I saw at forest and QPR was passionless, devoid of any spirit.
by colski boy's » 13 Dec 2015 18:39
Extended-Phenotype Listened on the radio so wasn't there but Dellor was going on about how shit Vydra was, which is a bit at odds with some of the fans reviews here
by Will95 » 13 Dec 2015 18:45
by CountryRoyal » 13 Dec 2015 19:17
Users browsing this forum: Four Of Clubs, Richard, secks and 246 guests