NamelesstaipairoyalNameless PAul Holsgrove obviously.
Michael Meaker for just being rubbish despite costing a lot and looking like he really didn't care (which by all accounts he didn't)
Not a big fan of Jamie Mackie either. Thought he was right up there in the 'turn it on for the cameras' club and again made it pretty clear that this was not where he wanted to be.
Not convinced by the Guthrie haters thing about 'refusing to play'. He din't. He told the manager he wasn't in the right frame of mind to travel to Sunderland (?) to sit on the bench. I thought there were off the field issues going on at the time and whilst I think a highly paid player kind of owes it to his employers to tough it out, sometimes it's more honest to say your not up to it if you are genuinely struggling. Would we praise an inured player who hid his injury and tried to play but as a result weakened the team and put himself out for longer ?
Meaker and Mackie both class.
Depends how low your class structure extends
if you were able to justify your claim it would be interesting, but hard to see how either of them could be someone we'd be glad to see back given their generally poor attitudes and patchy at best performances....
Mackie was a tryer - assuming you mean Jamie. John was shown to be out of his depth as the team progressed.
Meaker was a chin who happened to score last goal at Elm Park. And little else in my view.
Btw I would welcome the opinion of Aliegcymn on this one as he/she/it seems to be posting everywhere but on this thread .....