by tidus_mi2 »
03 Mar 2016 12:45
I find myself slightly siding with TBM on this one, the whole child category is too broad, I think the age of consent is fine where it is but I don't necessarily agree that everyone below that line is classified as a child, we even solely use the word paedophile when there are established words for sexual interest in different age groups, there is:
Paedophilia - children
Hebephilia - pre-pubescent to young teenagers, roughly 11-14
Ephebophilia - mid to late teens, roughly 15-19
I do think an adult who would seek to have sex with someone who is below the age of consent is wrong but I don't think he deserves to be known as a guy who has sex with children, if you told me someone had sex with a 15 year old, or someone had sex with a child, I'd certainly be more disgusted by the later as it implies someone who hasn't reached sexual maturity.
Also I don't know if the law specifies that the punishment is more severe if the victim is younger but it should in my opinion.
As for Johnson, it's bad enough that he targeted the 15 year old but it is the grooming he did that increases the severity of his actions. Hopefully he gets a sentence worthy of his crimes but being a high profile footballer, I doubt it.