by Top Flight » 13 May 2016 14:42
by genome » 13 May 2016 15:17
by Rollerbob » 13 May 2016 15:57
by Top Flight » 13 May 2016 16:28
by Longhorn1970 » 13 May 2016 17:21
Top Flight Longhorn. I think this is where we differ at the moment.
You think our players are good and it is McDermott's fault entirely that they have underperformed.
I think our players were average and had serious motivational problems that were not fixable in a short space of time by McDermott or any other manager.
Is that fair to say?
by Top Flight » 13 May 2016 19:59
Longhorn1970Top Flight Longhorn. I think this is where we differ at the moment.
You think our players are good and it is McDermott's fault entirely that they have underperformed.
I think our players were average and had serious motivational problems that were not fixable in a short space of time by McDermott or any other manager.
Is that fair to say?
Early results would suggest the squad assembled was more than capable at this level ... managers take the rap for poor results that's the way it is in the current landscape
by Top Flight » 13 May 2016 20:04
by Longhorn1970 » 14 May 2016 17:46
Top FlightLonghorn1970Top Flight Longhorn. I think this is where we differ at the moment.
You think our players are good and it is McDermott's fault entirely that they have underperformed.
I think our players were average and had serious motivational problems that were not fixable in a short space of time by McDermott or any other manager.
Is that fair to say?
Early results would suggest the squad assembled was more than capable at this level ... managers take the rap for poor results that's the way it is in the current landscape
That might be the way it is in the current landscape. But what is your opinion on the matter? In any case, every owner is different and has a different way of doing things. Some are more patient than others.
Do you blame McDermott completely for the lack of effort and desire from the squad this season?
by Top Flight » 15 May 2016 10:30
Longhorn1970Top FlightLonghorn1970
Early results would suggest the squad assembled was more than capable at this level ... managers take the rap for poor results that's the way it is in the current landscape
That might be the way it is in the current landscape. But what is your opinion on the matter? In any case, every owner is different and has a different way of doing things. Some are more patient than others.
Do you blame McDermott completely for the lack of effort and desire from the squad this season?
Since he took over yes, I said at the time I didn't agree with the appointment ..
by Hoop Blah » 15 May 2016 11:06
Top FlightLonghorn1970Top Flight
That might be the way it is in the current landscape. But what is your opinion on the matter? In any case, every owner is different and has a different way of doing things. Some are more patient than others.
Do you blame McDermott completely for the lack of effort and desire from the squad this season?
Since he took over yes, I said at the time I didn't agree with the appointment ..
You love to slam McDermott, but you don't offer an alternative as manager. You don't say who you would have appointed. Exactly who would you have chosen to be our manager?
by Top Flight » 15 May 2016 11:11
Hoop BlahTop FlightLonghorn1970
Since he took over yes, I said at the time I didn't agree with the appointment ..
You love to slam McDermott, but you don't offer an alternative as manager. You don't say who you would have appointed. Exactly who would you have chosen to be our manager?
I'd have probably appointed McDermott (at least I was relatively happy with him getting it at the time) but that doesn't mean you can't be balanced enough to accept that his performance since then, after a pretty decent start I hasten to add, has been bang average at best.
by Ian Royal » 15 May 2016 11:51
Top FlightHoop BlahTop Flight
You love to slam McDermott, but you don't offer an alternative as manager. You don't say who you would have appointed. Exactly who would you have chosen to be our manager?
I'd have probably appointed McDermott (at least I was relatively happy with him getting it at the time) but that doesn't mean you can't be balanced enough to accept that his performance since then, after a pretty decent start I hasten to add, has been bang average at best.
I do accept that our performances have been bang average since McDermott arrived. But, also, my analysis tells me that with 6 loan players, and several others at the end of their time at Reading, there were alot of boys who just didn't care. After several managerial failures, I concluded that the problems were not because of McDermott. McDermott is the one who will fix it and in that regard with 9 players already out the door, he is doing a pretty good job of clearing out all the bad characters. His real work has only just begun.
by TheBaldOne » 15 May 2016 13:55
by Portsmouth Royal » 15 May 2016 14:14
TheBaldOne Parkinson needs to be next manager . Brian hasn't got a clue.
by sandman » 15 May 2016 14:17
TheBaldOne Parkinson needs to be next manager . Brian hasn't got a clue.
by royalp-we » 15 May 2016 15:37
TheBaldOne Parkinson needs to be next manager . Brian hasn't got a clue.
by Longhorn1970 » 15 May 2016 15:55
TheBaldOne Parkinson needs to be next manager . Brian hasn't got a clue.
by Longhorn1970 » 15 May 2016 16:24
Top FlightLonghorn1970Top Flight
That might be the way it is in the current landscape. But what is your opinion on the matter? In any case, every owner is different and has a different way of doing things. Some are more patient than others.
Do you blame McDermott completely for the lack of effort and desire from the squad this season?
Since he took over yes, I said at the time I didn't agree with the appointment ..
You love to slam McDermott, but you don't offer an alternative as manager. You don't say who you would have appointed. Exactly who would you have chosen to be our manager?
by Top Flight » 16 May 2016 10:25
Ian RoyalTop FlightHoop Blah
I'd have probably appointed McDermott (at least I was relatively happy with him getting it at the time) but that doesn't mean you can't be balanced enough to accept that his performance since then, after a pretty decent start I hasten to add, has been bang average at best.
I do accept that our performances have been bang average since McDermott arrived. But, also, my analysis tells me that with 6 loan players, and several others at the end of their time at Reading, there were alot of boys who just didn't care. After several managerial failures, I concluded that the problems were not because of McDermott. McDermott is the one who will fix it and in that regard with 9 players already out the door, he is doing a pretty good job of clearing out all the bad characters. His real work has only just begun.
How is he doing a good job of clearing out anyone? Everyone who has left was out of contract or a loanee!
by Top Flight » 16 May 2016 10:29
Longhorn1970TheBaldOne Parkinson needs to be next manager . Brian hasn't got a clue.
He would be better ..
Users browsing this forum: Clyde1998, Google Adsense [Bot], Jammy Dodger, Snowflake Royal and 293 guests