by Josef Fritzl » 27 Aug 2016 15:27
by Platypuss » 27 Aug 2016 15:28
by RoyalBlue » 27 Aug 2016 15:35
by super darren caskey » 27 Aug 2016 15:36
by Platypuss » 27 Aug 2016 15:37
by RoyalBlue » 27 Aug 2016 15:39
by tmesis » 27 Aug 2016 15:41
Platypuss Can't see the point in this kind of possession football, if, when we do make progress up the pitch it just bogs down.
Player with the ball has minimal short or overlapping options, so has to go long, sideways or back.
by Josef Fritzl » 27 Aug 2016 15:43
by Steve_Upper_West » 27 Aug 2016 15:43
OilroyalSteve_Upper_WestOilroyal Anyone else having problems connecting to player?
Yes...... been trying for 15mins
It's a bloody nightmare
by Platypuss » 27 Aug 2016 15:44
tmesisPlatypuss Can't see the point in this kind of possession football, if, when we do make progress up the pitch it just bogs down.
Player with the ball has minimal short or overlapping options, so has to go long, sideways or back.
Why would we be more creative up front if we got the ball forward quicker?
by RoyalBlue » 27 Aug 2016 15:45
by Oilroyal » 27 Aug 2016 15:46
Steve_Upper_WestOilroyalSteve_Upper_West
Yes...... been trying for 15mins
It's a bloody nightmare
Any luck... ?
by i_kingsley » 27 Aug 2016 15:47
by tmesis » 27 Aug 2016 15:47
PlatypusstmesisPlatypuss Can't see the point in this kind of possession football, if, when we do make progress up the pitch it just bogs down.
Player with the ball has minimal short or overlapping options, so has to go long, sideways or back.
Why would we be more creative up front if we got the ball forward quicker?
non sequitur
nɒn ˈsɛkwɪtə/
noun
a conclusion or statement that does not logically follow from the previous argument or statement.
"his weird mixed metaphors and non sequiturs"
by Platypuss » 27 Aug 2016 15:49
by RoyalBlue » 27 Aug 2016 15:52
by From Despair To Where? » 27 Aug 2016 15:52
by tmesis » 27 Aug 2016 16:00
From Despair To Where? It's the slow, steady possession football that Platypus dislikes, it allows the opposition to get men behind the ball, get organised and be more difficult to break down.
More attacking urgency should in theory give them less chance to form up and get organised and us more chance of creating chances.
It does feel like I'm stating the obvious there.
by Platypuss » 27 Aug 2016 16:01
by tmesis » 27 Aug 2016 16:03
Platypuss Can't see the point in this kind of possession football.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 230 guests