by SCIAG » 18 Oct 2016 11:07
by genome » 18 Oct 2016 11:46
by sandman » 18 Oct 2016 12:09
by Ian Royal » 18 Oct 2016 12:37
Royal Ginger It's culturally important to the people who own the club, they do things differently. They're using what they have to demonstrate their profound sorrow, we the fans are just tools. The club is their thing, I'm a guest in their stadium so will be respectful.
by Stranded » 18 Oct 2016 12:38
genome When* the Queen dies this country will inevitably have an outpouring of grief. It's probably on the same level for the Thais. I've no problem with it.
You could always mourn Denny Fulbrook, or that poor lad who died of cancer the other week, if it suits you better
Sometimes I feel people go actively looking for things to complain about
by Sutekh » 18 Oct 2016 12:52
Strandedgenome When* the Queen dies this country will inevitably have an outpouring of grief. It's probably on the same level for the Thais. I've no problem with it.
You could always mourn Denny Fulbrook, or that poor lad who died of cancer the other week, if it suits you better
Sometimes I feel people go actively looking for things to complain about
When did Denny die? He and his wife were in the Monks on Thursday.
by loyalroyaldaz » 18 Oct 2016 12:57
genome When* the Queen dies this country will inevitably have an outpouring of grief. It's probably on the same level for the Thais. I've no problem with it.
You could always mourn Denny Fulbrook, or that poor lad who died of cancer the other week, if it suits you better
Sometimes I feel people go actively looking for things to complain about
by floyd__streete » 18 Oct 2016 13:08
SCIAG I'm sure the Thais found the week's national mourning for David Bowie very strange
by Stranded » 18 Oct 2016 13:28
SutekhStrandedgenome When* the Queen dies this country will inevitably have an outpouring of grief. It's probably on the same level for the Thais. I've no problem with it.
You could always mourn Denny Fulbrook, or that poor lad who died of cancer the other week, if it suits you better
Sometimes I feel people go actively looking for things to complain about
When did Denny die? He and his wife were in the Monks on Thursday.
From the STAR website http://star-reading.org/
"We were much saddened to hear, during the course of our Board meeting last Thursday, of the passing of Denny Fullbrook, aged 80. A life member of STAR, Denny was a stalwart of the old Reading Football Supporters’ Club committee and for many years the travel organiser, very well-known to supporters old and young. He loved his football and his travel to grounds up and down the country. Even though unwell he continued his fantastic support for the club, home and away, right until his end.
Our thoughts are with Ann, his widow, and his family at the difficult time for them".
Personally, as suggested above, I shall be using the minute's silence for Denny's memory and also the young chap who recently passed away. One would hope the club would also make mention of both these parties tonight as well.
by SCIAG » 18 Oct 2016 13:32
floyd__streeteSCIAG I'm sure the Thais found the week's national mourning for David Bowie very strange
The difference being of course that this particular outpouring came about via social media and was in no way state sponsored, was it.
by sandman » 18 Oct 2016 13:49
floyd__streeteSCIAG I'm sure the Thais found the week's national mourning for David Bowie very strange
The difference being of course that this particular outpouring came about via social media and was in no way state sponsored, was it.
I agree with the opening post tbh, this is ostentatious nonsense from the owners. No surprises whatsoever though to see the usual Stockholm-syndrome suffering apologists stick up for the ownership.
by Forbury Lion » 18 Oct 2016 17:19
What have you got against mums?Brosef Stalin Someones Mum FFS?
by Ian Royal » 18 Oct 2016 18:18
SCIAGfloyd__streeteSCIAG I'm sure the Thais found the week's national mourning for David Bowie very strange
The difference being of course that this particular outpouring came about via social media and was in no way state sponsored, was it.
There's every possibility that the Thais have some genuine affection for the old man, like some people in this country genuinely like the Queen and Jedward. Just because it's perplexing to me that other people get sad when a celebrity I don't care about dies doesn't mean I shouldn't respect their feelings, particularly after seeing people respect the deaths I care about, like Bowie.
I don't buy the "it's their club" argument. They own the club in the legal sense, but the club truly belongs to us. They're guests and should respect that. Of course, if they go buggering off when we refuse to do something then that's our loss, but legally owning the club doesn't give them the moral right to do whatever they want with it.
It's nonsense, but it means something to someone, so I'm not going to talk through any silence.
by leon » 18 Oct 2016 18:36
Ian RoyalSCIAGfloyd__streete
The difference being of course that this particular outpouring came about via social media and was in no way state sponsored, was it.
There's every possibility that the Thais have some genuine affection for the old man, like some people in this country genuinely like the Queen and Jedward. Just because it's perplexing to me that other people get sad when a celebrity I don't care about dies doesn't mean I shouldn't respect their feelings, particularly after seeing people respect the deaths I care about, like Bowie.
I don't buy the "it's their club" argument. They own the club in the legal sense, but the club truly belongs to us. They're guests and should respect that. Of course, if they go buggering off when we refuse to do something then that's our loss, but legally owning the club doesn't give them the moral right to do whatever they want with it.
It's nonsense, but it means something to someone, so I'm not going to talk through any silence.
Absolutely.
Do I think it's a bit weird? Yes. Would I do the same when the Queen died if I owned a Thai club? No.
But how on earth can anyone with a scrap of empathy and humanity get upset about this enough that they'd suggest ignoring (and presumably) disrupting a minute's silence for someone that means a lot to certain people. You'd surely have to be some sort of sociopath to take that approach. Disagree with the idea by all means, but show some oxf*rd respect.
by P!ssed Off » 18 Oct 2016 19:50
by leon » 18 Oct 2016 20:08
P!ssed Off It's understandable that our Thai owners are pulling out all the stops to 'respect' their monarchy given that Thais who don't get chucked in prison for 30 years.
by genome » 18 Oct 2016 20:43
loyalroyaldazgenome When* the Queen dies this country will inevitably have an outpouring of grief. It's probably on the same level for the Thais. I've no problem with it.
You could always mourn Denny Fulbrook, or that poor lad who died of cancer the other week, if it suits you better
Sometimes I feel people go actively looking for things to complain about
That young lad was my Son.
There were mutings of a minute applause for him in the 28th minute of tonights game.
That would be a huge gesture.
We his family are all going to be there tonight as we are every home game. We will reflect for a Minute on our wonderful Son's life, he was one of you, do it for him.
by Ian Royal » 18 Oct 2016 20:45
by Royal With Cheese » 18 Oct 2016 20:47
floyd__streete I agree with the opening post tbh, this is ostentatious nonsense from the owners. No surprises whatsoever though to see the usual Stockholm-syndrome suffering apologists stick up for the ownership.
by sandman » 18 Oct 2016 21:01
Users browsing this forum: Mr Angry and 276 guests