by Ian Royal » 28 Nov 2016 20:48
by seahawk10 » 28 Nov 2016 20:57
Maneki Nekogenome Also:The daughter-in-law of Zeng Qinghong, (former vice-president of the Chinese regime), Jiang Mei, was reported by overseas Chinese media as working with Dai Yongge, to launder billions of yuan overseas for corrupt officials.
http://www.chinauncensored.com/index.ph ... s-billions
live fast
dai yongge
by Scutterbucketz » 28 Nov 2016 21:22
by Jagermesiter1871 » 28 Nov 2016 21:31
Ian RoyalNameless If the Thai's have extracted the assets then that must mean a potential,purchaser is buying us as a football club, not a non footballing investment opportunity.
If the Thai's are only selling a majority holding, not the whole club, they must see some value in remaining involved.
I'm sceptical about all club owners, but am interested in why people think several groups seem interested if as is being suggested the biggest asset is not actually owned by the club any more.
At the more cynical end, football is always good for money laundering.
by oldebiscuit » 28 Nov 2016 21:34
One8Seven1* http://www.getreading.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/reading-fc-takeover-dai-yongee-12222786
Takeover talks at an advanced stage.
by BR0B0T » 28 Nov 2016 21:51
oldebiscuitOne8Seven1* http://www.getreading.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/reading-fc-takeover-dai-yongee-12222786
Takeover talks at an advanced stage.
Oh goody! Maybe another minutes silence when President Xi Jinping dies.
by WAZZOCK » 28 Nov 2016 21:53
CountryRoyalWAZZOCKCountryRoyal
You can forgive us for being apprehensive.
I suppose so yes, purely based on our experiences.
However, this mob are in a different stratosphere of wealth compared to our previous owners, so that is a big tick in the positives box for me. Reports are that finances within the club currently are in a very bad way, perhaps we've over stretched with some of the wages we have dished out?
For me: A stupidly rich benefactor + the Thai's + Nigel Howe + Brian Tevreden + Jaap Stam = a big win
Let's not forget we were DESPERATE for a striker of note to be signed in August, and we were all a bit fearful when it didn't materialise as a result of not being able to compete with the high prices in the market. Maybe, just maybe, with the Chinese we would have enough money to compete and get us over that line?
I get what you're saying and of course it's easy to get a bit giddy when you hear the word billionaire, but as you said, we've been stung before. Once bitten, twice shy and all that.
You are right though, the sums involved are on a different scale to what we are used to and yes, they could take us to that ever elusive "next level". However after seemingly putting to bed our behind the scenes problems and pushing in the right direction on and off the pitch one can justifiably worry (expected supporting reading ) how and when it's all going to go wrong. While relatively recent and early days you only have to look at clubs like Villa, Wolves and Fulham who have been taken over for mega bucks which hasn't translated into tangible on-field success.
My worry is that this potentially could have a negative impact on the team which have built up, backroom staff and playing staff, a seeming togetherness and surprising efficacy.
Of course it could go both ways, they Chinese could come in, fund a couple of important signings which aid in a promotion challenge a la Anton in 11/12. One way or another though I hope this gets resolved swiftly as prolonged uncertainty is only going to hamper our season.
by Y25Beryl » 28 Nov 2016 22:01
Pepe the HorsemanyuomiWinston Smith Wouldn't mind seeing a picture of these 2. can't imagine what a Chinese brother looks like tbh
Smoking hot.
by Nameless » 28 Nov 2016 22:20
WAZZOCKCountryRoyalWAZZOCK
I suppose so yes, purely based on our experiences.
However, this mob are in a different stratosphere of wealth compared to our previous owners, so that is a big tick in the positives box for me. Reports are that finances within the club currently are in a very bad way, perhaps we've over stretched with some of the wages we have dished out?
For me: A stupidly rich benefactor + the Thai's + Nigel Howe + Brian Tevreden + Jaap Stam = a big win
Let's not forget we were DESPERATE for a striker of note to be signed in August, and we were all a bit fearful when it didn't materialise as a result of not being able to compete with the high prices in the market. Maybe, just maybe, with the Chinese we would have enough money to compete and get us over that line?
I get what you're saying and of course it's easy to get a bit giddy when you hear the word billionaire, but as you said, we've been stung before. Once bitten, twice shy and all that.
You are right though, the sums involved are on a different scale to what we are used to and yes, they could take us to that ever elusive "next level". However after seemingly putting to bed our behind the scenes problems and pushing in the right direction on and off the pitch one can justifiably worry (expected supporting reading ) how and when it's all going to go wrong. While relatively recent and early days you only have to look at clubs like Villa, Wolves and Fulham who have been taken over for mega bucks which hasn't translated into tangible on-field success.
My worry is that this potentially could have a negative impact on the team which have built up, backroom staff and playing staff, a seeming togetherness and surprising efficacy.
Of course it could go both ways, they Chinese could come in, fund a couple of important signings which aid in a promotion challenge a la Anton in 11/12. One way or another though I hope this gets resolved swiftly as prolonged uncertainty is only going to hamper our season.
I think that's a perfectly balanced and reasonable way to look at things. Truth is, time will tell how it goes, all we can do is hope for the best.
The one point I will query is in bold above. I think our exceptional form on the pitch it papering over the cracks of what is a perilously bad financial situation behind the scenes. Truth is, if the Thai's were in a sound position to be able to bankroll the club, there is no way they would sell the majority with the club currently third in the league - and with a Premier League windfall up for grabs in May.
by CountryRoyal » 28 Nov 2016 22:47
NamelessWAZZOCKCountryRoyal
I get what you're saying and of course it's easy to get a bit giddy when you hear the word billionaire, but as you said, we've been stung before. Once bitten, twice shy and all that.
You are right though, the sums involved are on a different scale to what we are used to and yes, they could take us to that ever elusive "next level". However after seemingly putting to bed our behind the scenes problems and pushing in the right direction on and off the pitch one can justifiably worry (expected supporting reading ) how and when it's all going to go wrong. While relatively recent and early days you only have to look at clubs like Villa, Wolves and Fulham who have been taken over for mega bucks which hasn't translated into tangible on-field success.
My worry is that this potentially could have a negative impact on the team which have built up, backroom staff and playing staff, a seeming togetherness and surprising efficacy.
Of course it could go both ways, they Chinese could come in, fund a couple of important signings which aid in a promotion challenge a la Anton in 11/12. One way or another though I hope this gets resolved swiftly as prolonged uncertainty is only going to hamper our season.
I think that's a perfectly balanced and reasonable way to look at things. Truth is, time will tell how it goes, all we can do is hope for the best.
The one point I will query is in bold above. I think our exceptional form on the pitch it papering over the cracks of what is a perilously bad financial situation behind the scenes. Truth is, if the Thai's were in a sound position to be able to bankroll the club, there is no way they would sell the majority with the club currently third in the league - and with a Premier League windfall up for grabs in May.
If they are canny business people they may see the opportunity to make a guaranteed profit now, spread the risk of future costs and still be in a position to share in any future windfall. We don't know what the majority shareholding would be, the Thai's might still retain 49% ...
by muirinho » 28 Nov 2016 23:14
NamelessWAZZOCKCountryRoyal
I get what you're saying and of course it's easy to get a bit giddy when you hear the word billionaire, but as you said, we've been stung before. Once bitten, twice shy and all that.
You are right though, the sums involved are on a different scale to what we are used to and yes, they could take us to that ever elusive "next level". However after seemingly putting to bed our behind the scenes problems and pushing in the right direction on and off the pitch one can justifiably worry (expected supporting reading ) how and when it's all going to go wrong. While relatively recent and early days you only have to look at clubs like Villa, Wolves and Fulham who have been taken over for mega bucks which hasn't translated into tangible on-field success.
My worry is that this potentially could have a negative impact on the team which have built up, backroom staff and playing staff, a seeming togetherness and surprising efficacy.
Of course it could go both ways, they Chinese could come in, fund a couple of important signings which aid in a promotion challenge a la Anton in 11/12. One way or another though I hope this gets resolved swiftly as prolonged uncertainty is only going to hamper our season.
I think that's a perfectly balanced and reasonable way to look at things. Truth is, time will tell how it goes, all we can do is hope for the best.
The one point I will query is in bold above. I think our exceptional form on the pitch it papering over the cracks of what is a perilously bad financial situation behind the scenes. Truth is, if the Thai's were in a sound position to be able to bankroll the club, there is no way they would sell the majority with the club currently third in the league - and with a Premier League windfall up for grabs in May.
If they are canny business people they may see the opportunity to make a guaranteed profit now, spread the risk of future costs and still be in a position to share in any future windfall. We don't know what the majority shareholding would be, the Thai's might still retain 49% ...
by royalp-we » 28 Nov 2016 23:38
by Mike Hunt » 28 Nov 2016 23:48
royalp-we We will see.
A terrible amount of sh*t to stir by GetReading if they aren't actually at an 'advanced stage' as they report. We need the whole club from top to ground thinking about 3pts on Saturday - I really do hope this is resolved quickly either way and not left to drag on.
by Sutekh » 29 Nov 2016 08:58
Mike Huntroyalp-we We will see.
A terrible amount of sh*t to stir by GetReading if they aren't actually at an 'advanced stage' as they report. We need the whole club from top to ground thinking about 3pts on Saturday - I really do hope this is resolved quickly either way and not left to drag on.
+1
I cannot imagine GetReading would post this unless it was pretty concrete.... But hey - who knows until the club confirms it.
by George_ » 29 Nov 2016 09:03
Mike Huntroyalp-we We will see.
A terrible amount of sh*t to stir by GetReading if they aren't actually at an 'advanced stage' as they report. We need the whole club from top to ground thinking about 3pts on Saturday - I really do hope this is resolved quickly either way and not left to drag on.
+1
I cannot imagine GetReading would post this unless it was pretty concrete.... But hey - who knows until the club confirms it.
by One8Seven1* » 29 Nov 2016 11:00
winchester_royalElm Park Kid It still just comes down to accounting though. If the land had remained with the club then the Thais could have still just removed whatever income it generated and put it into other businesses - there's no guarantee why it would be used for the benefit of the team. Similarly, it perfectly possible that any income generate by separate company could have been passed back to the club.
When a football club is privately owned then it's own assets/debts are largely irrelevant - the same way that the fact Starbucks doesn't technically make any profit in the UK is irrelevant because the money is transferred to a lower tax area. The only thing that matters is the amount of money spent on the club, and that is 100% at the discretion of the owners.
You're right to say that of course, at the end of the day anyone thinking the money from the property sales would be going into buying us a new striker were living in a different world, but the fact the land has been shifted out of the club makes it even more clear that the land will be of no benefit to the club and that was the point I was trying to make.
And although the amount of money to spend is at the discretion of the owners, ultimately if the owners decide to jump ship the asset base of the football club will have an impact on our sustainability going forwards and the attractiveness of the club to investors. £15m is a material amount and I'm not sure it's correct to say that it's disappearance from the club accounts makes no difference at all.
At the end of the day if these Chinese investors come in with their millions and give us the £10m investment we need to get promotion, then it will all look pretty irrelevant, but for now I'm quite concerned.
by One8Seven1* » 29 Nov 2016 12:36
by Forbury Lion » 29 Nov 2016 12:37
What was their form like with the Thai owners and the Russian? - IIRC they were posting all sorts of rumours about an American who ironically they claimed was only interested in the land.Mike Huntroyalp-we We will see.
A terrible amount of sh*t to stir by GetReading if they aren't actually at an 'advanced stage' as they report. We need the whole club from top to ground thinking about 3pts on Saturday - I really do hope this is resolved quickly either way and not left to drag on.
+1
I cannot imagine GetReading would post this unless it was pretty concrete.... But hey - who knows until the club confirms it.
by One8Seven1* » 29 Nov 2016 12:43
by muirinho » 29 Nov 2016 12:44
Forbury LionWhat was their form like with the Thai owners and the Russian? - IIRC they were posting all sorts of rumours about an American who ironically they claimed was only interested in the land.Mike Huntroyalp-we We will see.
A terrible amount of sh*t to stir by GetReading if they aren't actually at an 'advanced stage' as they report. We need the whole club from top to ground thinking about 3pts on Saturday - I really do hope this is resolved quickly either way and not left to drag on.
+1
I cannot imagine GetReading would post this unless it was pretty concrete.... But hey - who knows until the club confirms it.
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], Royality creeps In and 220 guests