TBM Not sure why i said Derby lol
I meant Fulham
It was foggy - i couldn't tell who we were playing
He got injured during the Norwich game so wasn't risked in the starting XI.
I'll give you another
by genome » 06 Jan 2017 11:32
TBM Not sure why i said Derby lol
I meant Fulham
It was foggy - i couldn't tell who we were playing
by TBM » 06 Jan 2017 11:35
genomeTBM Not sure why i said Derby lol
I meant Fulham
It was foggy - i couldn't tell who we were playing
He got injured during the Norwich game so wasn't risked in the starting XI.
I'll give you another
by Pepe the Horseman » 06 Jan 2017 11:37
TBMgenomeTBM Not sure why i said Derby lol
I meant Fulham
It was foggy - i couldn't tell who we were playing
He got injured during the Norwich game so wasn't risked in the starting XI.
I'll give you another
He was still dropped though
The fact he came on before half time - means he wasn't injured....
So i'll give you that back
by TBM » 06 Jan 2017 11:38
by genome » 06 Jan 2017 11:39
by TBM » 06 Jan 2017 11:44
genome No, it means he wasn't risked, not dropped for tactical reasons.
TBM on the offensive because he know's he had a shocker.
by genome » 06 Jan 2017 11:46
by TBM » 06 Jan 2017 11:55
genome Because that's what the whole discussion was about you flipping truncheon
Stam wouldn't drop the club captain for a new signing.
by genome » 06 Jan 2017 11:57
TBMgenome Because that's what the whole discussion was about you flipping truncheon
Stam wouldn't drop the club captain for a new signing.
He did against Derby
by Sutekh » 06 Jan 2017 12:03
by TBM » 06 Jan 2017 12:09
genomeTBMgenome Because that's what the whole discussion was about you flipping truncheon
Stam wouldn't drop the club captain for a new signing.
He did against Derby
No he didn't, he played the 90 minutes.
by genome » 06 Jan 2017 12:15
by MouldyRoyal » 06 Jan 2017 12:19
TBMgenomeTBM He dropped him against Derby
He played the 90 minutes
Not sure why i said Derby lol
I meant Fulham
It was foggy - i couldn't tell who we were playing
by leon » 06 Jan 2017 12:22
by TBM » 06 Jan 2017 12:22
genome For the Fulham match.
Keep up TBM
by genome » 06 Jan 2017 12:38
TBMgenome For the Fulham match.
Keep up TBM
At least now you admit he was dropped for it
by Pepe the Horseman » 06 Jan 2017 12:41
by paultheroyal » 06 Jan 2017 12:53
genome Because that's what the whole discussion was about you flipping truncheon
Stam wouldn't drop the club captain for a new signing.
by Ian Royal » 06 Jan 2017 13:17
LoyalRoyal22 I hope this outlay is because of the new ownership, because the club really are not in a position to be spending £2-£3m on a new player, if everything I have heard & read is to be believed.
If this isn't from the chinese its just more debt for the club.
by Nameless » 06 Jan 2017 13:20
Ian RoyalLoyalRoyal22 I hope this outlay is because of the new ownership, because the club really are not in a position to be spending £2-£3m on a new player, if everything I have heard & read is to be believed.
If this isn't from the chinese its just more debt for the club.
If it's from the chinese it's still debt to the club. Just owed to them rather than the Thais or some third party.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 240 guests