by genome » 13 Jan 2017 11:21
by Ouroboros » 13 Jan 2017 11:22
by Rollerbob » 13 Jan 2017 11:26
genome Oh, you're trying to be funny
by genome » 13 Jan 2017 11:29
No Fixed Abodegenome Oh, you're trying to be funny
IF another 10,000 people had turned up last night the attendance WOULD'VE been 12,000.
by George_ » 13 Jan 2017 11:30
Westwood52 Kermit 2: I disagree with most, I thought he was awful. Missed a sitter, kept on falling over or losing the ball in possession.
by Ian Royal » 13 Jan 2017 12:43
Top Flight Feed the Kermie and he will score.
by bcubed » 13 Jan 2017 13:46
Ian RoyalTop Flight Feed the Kermie and he will score.
Except for when he regularly misses, like he did with two good chances last night.
by bobby1413 » 13 Jan 2017 14:14
by Victor Meldrew » 13 Jan 2017 14:25
by Top Flight » 13 Jan 2017 14:36
Ian RoyalTop Flight Feed the Kermie and he will score.
Except for when he regularly misses, like he did with two good chances last night.
by Hound » 13 Jan 2017 15:28
by AthleticoSpizz » 13 Jan 2017 16:01
the attendance for what has traditionally been a well supported fixture was pretty abysmal, highlighted by the unusually high amount of matchtime posters posting.bobby1413 I know we really don't need any more proof but some of our fans are fcking mongs.
Twat on twitter:
"Some of our 'fans' deserve that, 12.000 for a league game - pathetic; hope you lot who didn't go stay away forever #tinpotfans"
Some responses are things like:
"I was working. Is that ok?"
And he responds "yea of course that's fine"
Thanks you fcking d1ck
by tidus_mi2 » 13 Jan 2017 16:40
by Ian Royal » 13 Jan 2017 16:49
Top FlightIan RoyalTop Flight Feed the Kermie and he will score.
Except for when he regularly misses, like he did with two good chances last night.
They weren't easy chances. Kermie did well with those chances. McLeary's ball was lofted up slightly too high for him so he couldn't get above it enough. He still managed to crash it onto the crossbar.
The other chance, the defender was right in the way and put him under massive pressure but he still managed to head the ball and the defenders head to narrowly miss the post. The cut on his head shows that it wasn't an easy chance. He had to clash with the defenders head as well as the ball. He did well with a difficult chance.
If we had made him another two chances like that, the likelihood is that one of them would have gone in. We just need to do more in games. He showed what a serious aerial threat he can be. Let's take advantage of that strength. We're not doing enough going forward. Coppells side was the benchmark of what can be achieved in this division. We are not creating anywhere near the same number or quality of chances that the 106 side created and we don't play with anything like the same level of urgency.
Still though, we are doing well. So we can't complain too much and we are improving game by game. Long live Stam.
by Lower West » 13 Jan 2017 17:08
Hound The midfield was all wrong
by Huckleberry Hound » 13 Jan 2017 18:53
by Top Flight » 13 Jan 2017 19:26
Ian RoyalTop FlightIan Royal Except for when he regularly misses, like he did with two good chances last night.
They weren't easy chances. Kermie did well with those chances. McLeary's ball was lofted up slightly too high for him so he couldn't get above it enough. He still managed to crash it onto the crossbar.
The other chance, the defender was right in the way and put him under massive pressure but he still managed to head the ball and the defenders head to narrowly miss the post. The cut on his head shows that it wasn't an easy chance. He had to clash with the defenders head as well as the ball. He did well with a difficult chance.
If we had made him another two chances like that, the likelihood is that one of them would have gone in. We just need to do more in games. He showed what a serious aerial threat he can be. Let's take advantage of that strength. We're not doing enough going forward. Coppells side was the benchmark of what can be achieved in this division. We are not creating anywhere near the same number or quality of chances that the 106 side created and we don't play with anything like the same level of urgency.
Still though, we are doing well. So we can't complain too much and we are improving game by game. Long live Stam.
If he's so bloody good, he shouldn't need them to be easy chances. You've basically said he needs to either have an inch perfect ball placed on his forehead and / or no defenders pressuring him to score. And I didn't say they were easy chances anyway. I said they were good chances. Which they were.
by Hound » 13 Jan 2017 21:37
by Muskrat » 13 Jan 2017 21:54
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Royal Ginger, WestYorksRoyal and 247 guests