by bobby1413 » 07 Feb 2017 21:28
by Silver Fox » 10 Feb 2017 20:59
by AthleticoSpizz » 10 Feb 2017 21:14
by BR0B0T » 10 Feb 2017 21:18
by AthleticoSpizz » 10 Feb 2017 21:46
by BR0B0T » 11 Feb 2017 01:50
AthleticoSpizz Mawkish....28 years on
by bobby1413 » 11 Feb 2017 03:30
by bobby1413 » 11 Feb 2017 03:36
by sandman » 11 Feb 2017 04:34
by Sutekh » 11 Feb 2017 10:13
by AthleticoSpizz » 11 Feb 2017 10:29
by Nameless » 11 Feb 2017 11:05
by stealthpapes » 11 Feb 2017 12:45
by Ian Royal » 11 Feb 2017 14:30
Nameless It was the Sun that lied, and continued to lie and refused to apologise. It's not Murdoch, or any other paper or organisation that is so tainted so bringing up Sky or the Mail or the Times is irrelevant.
It is the paper that has had access removed, not individual journalists. Again it is irrelevant that people have changed. Where companies have committed illegal acts in the past the fact that they have changed CEO, or other staff, makes no difference. They are still responsible as a body for what was done in their name.
This is not a random ban just because an owner decides they don't like what they have said (see RFC Banning Clive Baskerville), Liverpool fans and people in general have effectively cleansed the city of the Sun and this is the club backing the lasting feeling that the Sun should have no connection to the city.
I think it is a good gesture, it doesn't mean the Sun can't report on Liverpool games, or that Sun journalists can't go to Anfield. It just means the club won't work with them, or give them free tickets or special access.
by Victor Meldrew » 12 Feb 2017 12:21
by BR0B0T » 12 Feb 2017 14:59
Victor Meldrew Back to the football-if Liverpool play like that for the rest of the season they are nailed on for the top 4 which seems to be the aim of the big clubs (and Spurs) apart from Chelsea who have already won it.
A shame Liverpool aren't in a Super League of the top six as they would surely be champions (based on results against the others)-if only they could be flat-track bullies like Man Utd were when they were good (it seems quite a long time ago but another £200-300 million might bring them up to scratch).
by Victor Meldrew » 12 Feb 2017 15:39
BR0B0TVictor Meldrew Back to the football-if Liverpool play like that for the rest of the season they are nailed on for the top 4 which seems to be the aim of the big clubs (and Spurs) apart from Chelsea who have already won it.
A shame Liverpool aren't in a Super League of the top six as they would surely be champions (based on results against the others)-if only they could be flat-track bullies like Man Utd were when they were good (it seems quite a long time ago but another £200-300 million might bring them up to scratch).
When were Liverpool last good?
Average league position for the last decade 5-6th
Game-raising in their cup final etc
One Mane club...etc
by BR2 » 13 Feb 2017 11:53
No Fixed AbodeBR0B0TVictor Meldrew Back to the football-if Liverpool play like that for the rest of the season they are nailed on for the top 4 which seems to be the aim of the big clubs (and Spurs) apart from Chelsea who have already won it.
A shame Liverpool aren't in a Super League of the top six as they would surely be champions (based on results against the others)-if only they could be flat-track bullies like Man Utd were when they were good (it seems quite a long time ago but another £200-300 million might bring them up to scratch).
When were Liverpool last good?
Average league position for the last decade 5-6th
Game-raising in their cup final etc
One Mane club...etc
27 (Twenty seven) years since they last won the league. They're the club that have thrown the most money at trying to win the Prem but failing to do so. As for the super league of the top six - well, that's the sort of silly thing many Liverpool fans come up with.
"If the league was over a calendar year" etc. etc.
FWIW I was pleased Liverpool beat Spurs though.
Users browsing this forum: Four Of Clubs and 70 guests