by Z175 » 10 Apr 2017 11:45
by Nameless » 10 Apr 2017 12:07
by Vicky Pollard » 10 Apr 2017 12:36
Z175 I think that we still have a problem with the character in the squad.
When the going is good, the likes of Williams, McCleary, McShane. Swift, Beerens, Obita, even Blackett and Gunter can be very good. I think they would possibly be at a higher level if they had the consistency. This isn't unusual in the Championship, if a player can turn it on week in week out they pretty quickly move up, like Sigurdsson and Long.
But previously our players like Parkinson, Williams, Viveash, McAnuff, Federici, Kitson, perhaps Gorkss, Kebe, even Harper, just from the top of my head, had some sort of mentality trait that they believed in themselves so much that they dug deep when the going got tough. When they started a game badly players like this just stepped up and dug in. You could sing "get into them etc" knowing there would be a reaction.
This season when we go 2-0 down it is a horrific site. As above this isn't a one off - we have conceeded 4 or more 4 times now! The positioning falls apart, they can't string a pass together and they become headless chickens. Remembering Williams and McCleary squaring up last season. Clearly the amount of loanees last season turning the lack of team spirit into a season defining problem and that lack of leadership has been addressed a bit with Kermorgant and Van Den Berg arriving but I still think we don't have that inspirational Captain figure, let alone the "team of captains" we have been blessed with before.
When you throw in these fragile mercurial talents with 3 loanees - it all seems a bit inevitable that one penalty can blow you away. Particularly when the style of play requires a lot of self belief to toy with the ball in front of your own goal to draw the opposition out.
I'm sure the potential return of VDB, Williams McShane will help matters, but I still think leaders in the squad don't even have to be in the XI to inspire the team. I think we have a real leader in Jaap Stam but he needs someone more like him in the squad!
I think the verdict on the bizarre decisions to regularly leave out players like Beerens. Williams and Swift who have created most of our goals, and bring in Mutch and Grabban will wait until the end of the season. There is no doubt to me that Williams, Beerens and Swift look pretty fighting fit and if they inspire us to end the season with 3 wins then the loans will have been worth it.
Although I think I read the deal with Mutch is to sign him permanently in the summer, hopefully we can pull out!
by Z175 » 10 Apr 2017 15:13
Vicky PollardZ175 Kebe
by The Cap » 10 Apr 2017 15:49
Z175 wrote:
Ok he had a debatable attitude in refusing to play and demanding a move...
But when that guy was on form and on the pitch he wasn't just pace, goals and assists. He was crucial in our box in the air repelling corners, free kicks, and even the occasional off the line blockage.
That is the sort of attitude I want from our players. That sort of extreme personality is exactly what we miss in my humble opinion!
Look how insane Roy Keane was.
by The Royal Forester » 10 Apr 2017 18:46
JR In one way I'm happy with that result - not only is it a wake up call and should leave to some of the loan signings being set aside but it keeps alive the dream of going up with negative goal difference.
To be the club with the most ever FA Cup defeats, highest championship points total and only British team ever to be promoted with negative goal difference would be quite a set of achievements!
by Ian Royal » 10 Apr 2017 19:10
The Royal ForesterJR In one way I'm happy with that result - not only is it a wake up call and should leave to some of the loan signings being set aside but it keeps alive the dream of going up with negative goal difference.
To be the club with the most ever FA Cup defeats, highest championship points total and only British team ever to be promoted with negative goal difference would be quite a set of achievements!
Can you explain to me how this is possible? Every club who does not win it that year is defeated once in the cup that season. So, surely that would make clubs who have played in each season that Reading have, would have the same number of defeats? Don't forget that any club who has gone out of the League will still have played in the F A cup.
by The Royal Forester » 10 Apr 2017 20:51
Ian RoyalThe Royal ForesterJR In one way I'm happy with that result - not only is it a wake up call and should leave to some of the loan signings being set aside but it keeps alive the dream of going up with negative goal difference.
To be the club with the most ever FA Cup defeats, highest championship points total and only British team ever to be promoted with negative goal difference would be quite a set of achievements!
Can you explain to me how this is possible? Every club who does not win it that year is defeated once in the cup that season. So, surely that would make clubs who have played in each season that Reading have, would have the same number of defeats? Don't forget that any club who has gone out of the League will still have played in the F A cup.
We're allegedly the oldest club to have consistently entered who hasn't won it. Not sure if it counts Preliminary rounds or not... we've never been non-league.
by The Cube » 10 Apr 2017 21:20
by marlowuk » 10 Apr 2017 21:56
The Cube Hopefully kill this off before more people get things wrong.
Reading first entered the FA Cup in 1877, and have entered every season since when the competition took place (there were some gaps during wartime). Some of those entries were into the qualifying round stage. None of the 91 other Premier and Football League clubs entered before us.
by Gobsheik » 10 Apr 2017 22:00
by The Cube » 11 Apr 2017 07:27
marlowukThe Cube Hopefully kill this off before more people get things wrong.
Reading first entered the FA Cup in 1877, and have entered every season since when the competition took place (there were some gaps during wartime). Some of those entries were into the qualifying round stage. None of the 91 other Premier and Football League clubs entered before us.
I'm sure you are right but Crystal Palace did enter in the first ever FA cup competition in 1871 which was before us. Presumably you have done the research and found that they dropped out of the competition in some of the subsequent years?
by The Royal Forester » 11 Apr 2017 14:16
by Pandoras Box » 11 Apr 2017 22:31
Gobsheik Looking at the 'Faces in the Crowd' on Getreading website, the fans looked pissed off even before the game started!!!
by The Cap » 12 Apr 2017 09:26
Pandoras Box wrote:Gobsheik wrote:
Looking at the 'Faces in the Crowd' on Getreading website, the fans looked pissed off even before the game started!!!
Yep. Because the seats are like a chartered Monarch flight.
The view at lower levels is shite.
Stewarding is heavy handed and gets worse every year .
Coppers, safety stewards, game stewards and even paramedics staring you down waiting for some slight 'incident'. Police often filming you (just in case).
If you stand for ten seconds you get threatened with being thrown out, even though the web footed fvckers can stand all match with no reprimand, so it can't be down to a safety issue.
The whole place is solely based on Norwich having a great afternoon (which might make sense) but to the detriment of any away support. Probably my last time there even though I used to enjoy it.
by LoyalRoyal22 » 12 Apr 2017 10:24
by marlowuk » 13 Apr 2017 01:45
The CubemarlowukThe Cube Hopefully kill this off before more people get things wrong.
Reading first entered the FA Cup in 1877, and have entered every season since when the competition took place (there were some gaps during wartime). Some of those entries were into the qualifying round stage. None of the 91 other Premier and Football League clubs entered before us.
I'm sure you are right but Crystal Palace did enter in the first ever FA cup competition in 1871 which was before us. Presumably you have done the research and found that they dropped out of the competition in some of the subsequent years?
Different club.
by maffff » 13 Apr 2017 09:31
Pandoras BoxGobsheik Looking at the 'Faces in the Crowd' on Getreading website, the fans looked pissed off even before the game started!!!
Yep. Because the seats are like a chartered Monarch flight.
by CountryRoyal » 13 Apr 2017 09:45
maffffPandoras BoxGobsheik Looking at the 'Faces in the Crowd' on Getreading website, the fans looked pissed off even before the game started!!!
Yep. Because the seats are like a chartered Monarch flight.
Least it's not like a United flight.
by Flyingkiwi » 16 Apr 2017 07:37
Norfolk Royal Left when the fifth went in, jumped on a bus and now back home. I'm claiming the fastest ever BFTG thread.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 234 guests