by Brum Royal » 26 Apr 2017 13:39
by Silver Fox » 26 Apr 2017 13:44
by TFF » 26 Apr 2017 14:21
by Hoop Blah » 26 Apr 2017 15:08
Silver Fox Definitely disagree with him that the punishment was because he is a controversial figure though
by Silver Fox » 26 Apr 2017 15:55
by Hoop Blah » 26 Apr 2017 16:19
Silver Fox Has anyone else been done for betting on this many matches? Only then can I decide if poor 'ickle Joey has been harshly treated or not
by Brum Royal » 26 Apr 2017 16:54
Hoop BlahSilver Fox Has anyone else been done for betting on this many matches? Only then can I decide if poor 'ickle Joey has been harshly treated or not
It's only a games per week and I think I read they only changed the rules so that they couldn't bet on any matches a few years ago so I'm not even sure if the 1,200 all count.
It just seems disproportionate to me, regardless of the volume. If they'd said he was betting and there was a suspicion or proof of match fixing as a result then I'd probably understand it but he didn't bet on a single fixture he was physically involved in.
by Uke » 26 Apr 2017 22:14
TFFVisionUke Newcastle United and West Ham raided by the HMRC following an investigation into transfer activity. Lee Charnley arrested along with several others.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/201 ... ames-park/
It's always the ones you least expect...
Was there anyone these two clubs may have had in common with each other?
Both are owned/run by absolute w@nkers. I mean people are rightly sceptical about so much foreign ownership of English clubs but these are two British owners that are contemptible in almost every way.
French po-po on the case too
Got to be Marseille - Newcastle did the Thauvin/Cabella swap/loan and West Ham of course the Payet back and forth
by From Despair To Where? » 27 Apr 2017 03:42
Brum RoyalHoop BlahSilver Fox Has anyone else been done for betting on this many matches? Only then can I decide if poor 'ickle Joey has been harshly treated or not
It's only a games per week and I think I read they only changed the rules so that they couldn't bet on any matches a few years ago so I'm not even sure if the 1,200 all count.
It just seems disproportionate to me, regardless of the volume. If they'd said he was betting and there was a suspicion or proof of match fixing as a result then I'd probably understand it but he didn't bet on a single fixture he was physically involved in.
Not quite. He didn't bet on them to lose a game he was involved in, but he did bet on them winning or first scorer in a few games when he was playing
by AthleticoSpizz » 27 Apr 2017 07:05
by Whore Jackie » 03 May 2017 09:21
by Winston Smith » 03 May 2017 09:23
by Sutekh » 03 May 2017 14:02
by ayjaydee » 03 May 2017 18:44
Whore Jackie Aaron Lennon detained under section 136 of the Mental Health Act by police on a busy road in Salford and taken to hospital for assessment.
ayjaydeeWhore Jackie Aaron Lennon detained under section 136 of the Mental Health Act by police on a busy road in Salford and taken to hospital for assessment.
Wrong thread.
Being sectioned is not being arrested and putting Lennon in a thread alongside murderers and rapists is a tad unfeeling to say the least.
by Sutekh » 04 May 2017 14:05
by janesill » 10 May 2017 05:03
by genome » 23 May 2017 20:03
by Pepe the Horseman » 24 May 2017 09:29
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 92 guests