WAZZOCK Leon's thrown the towel in.
Snowflakes 1-0 Leon
You should post more. You really add value.
by leon » 04 Dec 2017 15:14
WAZZOCK Leon's thrown the towel in.
Snowflakes 1-0 Leon
by Snowflake Royal » 04 Dec 2017 17:21
leonSnowflake Royal Fair enough, you brought it up again.
Because I’m right.
Only a fool or someone who has an odd need to try and win internet arguments with strangers would argue you don’t need strikers playing as strikers.
by leon » 04 Dec 2017 19:33
Snowflake RoyalleonSnowflake Royal Fair enough, you brought it up again.
Because I’m right.
Only a fool or someone who has an odd need to try and win internet arguments with strangers would argue you don’t need strikers playing as strikers.
Ok, so you don't want to talk about it.
Other than to raise it yourself several times and come back just to say you are right, and I'm a fool to disagree with you on an internet DISCUSSION board.
And to misrepresent what I said. I've never said you don't need strikers to play as strikers.
To recap your view (paraphrasing) We got better once we started playing Smith. Although Smith isn't the reason we got better
(and we lost the first game he played and he went off injured at 1-0 in a game we won 3-1. )
We shouldn't play non-strikers at striker.
(Even though we've won two games doing so.)
But you won't answer what the solution is if there are no fit and ready strikers, just that we have to play one regardless.
Well, ok then. I'm the fool.
by AthleticoSpizz » 04 Dec 2017 19:41
by genome » 04 Dec 2017 19:58
by WAZZOCK » 04 Dec 2017 23:10
leonWAZZOCK Leon's thrown the towel in.
Snowflakes 1-0 Leon
You should post more. You really add value.
by leon » 05 Dec 2017 00:10
WAZZOCKleonWAZZOCK Leon's thrown the towel in.
Snowflakes 1-0 Leon
You should post more. You really add value.
Absolutely rattled, it's tough to see really.
by WAZZOCK » 05 Dec 2017 06:30
leonWAZZOCKleon
You should post more. You really add value.
Absolutely rattled, it's tough to see really.
No Kes, I just think you’re a cnut.
Apologies if you’re not Kes obviously. My opinion of you hasn’t changed, obviously.
by leon » 05 Dec 2017 07:26
WAZZOCKleonWAZZOCK
Absolutely rattled, it's tough to see really.
No Kes, I just think you’re a cnut.
Apologies if you’re not Kes obviously. My opinion of you hasn’t changed, obviously.
Sensational, not content with simply losing the debate he's now lashing out at the spectators. It's reminiscent of Cantona '95. We don't want that in the game.
by WAZZOCK » 05 Dec 2017 08:38
leonWAZZOCKleon
No Kes, I just think you’re a cnut.
Apologies if you’re not Kes obviously. My opinion of you hasn’t changed, obviously.
Sensational, not content with simply losing the debate he's now lashing out at the spectators. It's reminiscent of Cantona '95. We don't want that in the game.
Kes and Ian an item.Well I never.
Platypus, do your stuff.
by leon » 05 Dec 2017 10:41
WAZZOCKleonWAZZOCK
Sensational, not content with simply losing the debate he's now lashing out at the spectators. It's reminiscent of Cantona '95. We don't want that in the game.
Kes and Ian an item.Well I never.
Platypus, do your stuff.
And in a complete act of desperation, he resorts to petty insults.
A sad day.
by Half Biscuit » 05 Dec 2017 16:16
by John Madejski's Wallet » 05 Dec 2017 17:07
Half Biscuit Who is this Kes you guys keep mentioning?
by Half Biscuit » 05 Dec 2017 17:13
John Madejski's WalletHalf Biscuit Who is this Kes you guys keep mentioning?
'kin hell Kes, how many usernames do you have?
by Sutekh » 06 Dec 2017 08:48
by Stockport Royal » 06 Dec 2017 09:24
by WAZZOCK » 06 Dec 2017 21:19
by Half Biscuit » 06 Dec 2017 21:22
by John Smith » 07 Dec 2017 12:05
Sutekh .
by Sutekh » 07 Dec 2017 13:37
John SmithSutekh .
Hi, can you please make a thread for the forthcoming Cardiff City home game please thank you please
Users browsing this forum: Royals and Racers, WestYorksRoyal and 158 guests