Winston Biscuit
People being so bored they started lighting up phones - 0/10
Yeah what was that all about?
We'll embarassing
by John Madejski's Wallet » 23 Dec 2017 20:01
Winston Biscuit
People being so bored they started lighting up phones - 0/10
by Ascotexgunner » 23 Dec 2017 20:06
John Madejski's WalletWinston Biscuit
People being so bored they started lighting up phones - 0/10
Yeah what was that all about?
We'll embarassing
by La Flama Blanca » 23 Dec 2017 20:11
by Platypuss » 23 Dec 2017 20:12
Westwood52 I'm trying to remember a worse 1st half performance; but am struggling ! Even going back to the Bullivant/Burns/Adkins/Clarke stewardship.
Changes have to be made; otherwise like the England cricket team and Broad, Ali and Cook; they can just be allowed to rock up and pick up their appearance money. Kermit was awfully slow-these days unless the ball is played directly to him; he just doesn't want to know. So big Daddy now deserves a start-actually he did alright when he came on. We also need a dominant CH; although McShane didn't do much wrong-his physicality has just gone-time to give Tyler a go (yes I know-but at least he's a bit of a beast). Joey was just awful full stop. There was that moment in the 2nd half when we broke out at speed seeking the equalizer & he just waved everyone past him & just couldn't get going. Trouble is-if Swifty can only play 30 mins-we have no one to replace him-unless Richards is given a punt and Bacuna moved to CM.
Changes have to be made-we cannot carry on with players being allowed to get away with a performance like that-without a clear warning that failure to perform means you are ditched.
IMHO:
Mannone 5: Couple of regulation saves; a couple of awful kicks-in the circumstances should he even have been playing ?
Gunter 5: A couple of good crosses from supposedly his weaker left foot. But he is a senior pro & needs to take on responsibility; not continually wuss out of big plays.
Bacuna 6: It wasn't all bad-but certainly not one of his better games.
Moore 6: MOM, tried to drive the team on 2nd half-could he be tried in Joey's position if all else fails. More gutted than anyone at the end; but that pass back wont help his Wet Sham ambition.
Mc Shane 5: Not dominant ; but didn't do much wrong.
Joey 2: Absolute embarrassment. Too slow and unathletic. Time for the long drop.
Kelly 6: It wasn't all bad- but it took him an age to have a go-from which Barrow scored. I think someone in the front row told him you are supposed to take a shot when you are in the penalty area.
Edwards 4: Just bad.
Alukho 3 : The odd bits of good work, but generally just didn't turn up-he is having a horror season-I am waiting for him to set the team alight-but it just doesn't look as if it is going to happen. He looks totally overawed.
Kermit 2: The end of the line I am afraid-he has now become detrimental to the team.
Barrow 6: Some moments ; but he rarely came alive.
Swifty: Obviously not fit & caught on the ball a few times- but he did spark us into life.
Big Daddy: Has to start-a big awkward lump-but he has a bit of pace, and put in a couple of decent crosses.
Ref: We were so bad-we made him look good-missed however an obvious yellow when a Burton defender launched the ball into the stand after the whistle has blown.
And yes I am in the keep jap Stam camp-but give him only just enough money for a LB and sort of striker in Jan-but don't spend big money. LB is the big priority and we just have to muddle through without a striker.
by Chuckle Brother » 23 Dec 2017 20:21
McDermolenko As I told Ady on BBC Berkshire during the post match reaction, we need to have a little patience as Rome really wasn’t built in a day.
We’ve had 7/8 manager stints in the past 7 years and it’s got us absolutely bloody nowhere.
Stam is playing a style of football that is closest to emulating that of a team with genuine European pedigree. Hoof ball doesn’t belong in Europe, and alas sticking Pulis in the managers seat won’t gain us any long term success at all.
If you disagree, just p off.
by paultheroyal » 23 Dec 2017 20:27
by madstadblues » 23 Dec 2017 20:28
by McDermolenko » 23 Dec 2017 20:28
paultheroyalMcDermolenko As I told Ady on BBC Berkshire during the post match reaction, we need to have a little patience as Rome really wasn’t built in a day.
We’ve had 7/8 manager stints in the past 7 years and it’s got us absolutely bloody nowhere.
Stam is playing a style of football that is closest to emulating that of a team with genuine European pedigree. Hoof ball doesn’t belong in Europe, and alas sticking Pulis in the managers seat won’t gain us any long term success at all.
If you disagree, just p off.
You came across as a stereotypical wannabe speak sound bites fan on the radio and appears you want to repeat that on here - well done.
by paultheroyal » 23 Dec 2017 20:30
by paultheroyal » 23 Dec 2017 20:30
McDermolenkopaultheroyalMcDermolenko As I told Ady on BBC Berkshire during the post match reaction, we need to have a little patience as Rome really wasn’t built in a day.
We’ve had 7/8 manager stints in the past 7 years and it’s got us absolutely bloody nowhere.
Stam is playing a style of football that is closest to emulating that of a team with genuine European pedigree. Hoof ball doesn’t belong in Europe, and alas sticking Pulis in the managers seat won’t gain us any long term success at all.
If you disagree, just p off.
You came across as a stereotypical wannabe speak sound bites fan on the radio and appears you want to repeat that on here - well done.
You’re lucky that they cut me off when they did otherwise I’d have knocked your backwards way of thinking back into last Tuesday.
by McDermolenko » 23 Dec 2017 20:32
paultheroyalMcDermolenkopaultheroyal
You came across as a stereotypical wannabe speak sound bites fan on the radio and appears you want to repeat that on here - well done.
You’re lucky that they cut me off when they did otherwise I’d have knocked your backwards way of thinking back into last Tuesday.
They cut you off for a reason - HTH
by Snowflake Royal » 23 Dec 2017 20:37
by Hound » 23 Dec 2017 20:42
madstadblues IMHO, we are great against open attacking teams - I have seen the best football under Stam as well as the worst. If a team lines up with 5 at the back and plays defensively we have been poor. Again, IMHO this is a combination of not having technically good enough players and not changing the system (being flexible).
by Hound » 23 Dec 2017 20:45
Snowflake Royal The players were abject, but the set up was just as bad.
You can't field a playmaker like Kelly and ask him to cover at right back and stand between the centrebacks and watch them push forward.
The whole shape is wrong. We're relying on our centrebacks to be the creative outlet. It's stupid. Our fullbacks push high up the pitch and our midfield either drops into defence or stands next to the striker. There's no movement. The players run away from the ball, there's almost never two quick passes forward in a row because each player is isolated and only those behind are in space.
The desire for how to play is right, but the set up, execution and application is terrible.
by Snowflake Royal » 23 Dec 2017 20:58
HoundSnowflake Royal The players were abject, but the set up was just as bad.
You can't field a playmaker like Kelly and ask him to cover at right back and stand between the centrebacks and watch them push forward.
The whole shape is wrong. We're relying on our centrebacks to be the creative outlet. It's stupid. Our fullbacks push high up the pitch and our midfield either drops into defence or stands next to the striker. There's no movement. The players run away from the ball, there's almost never two quick passes forward in a row because each player is isolated and only those behind are in space.
The desire for how to play is right, but the set up, execution and application is terrible.
I think you’re right to an extent, but Swift coming on improved this a lot. Actually picked the ball up between the lines
We just played abysmally to be honest. Couldn’t string two passes together and let in two of the softest goals imaginable
Kelly is no playmaker at the moment imo. He is a big part of the problem - so negative
by paultheroyal » 23 Dec 2017 21:02
McDermolenkopaultheroyalMcDermolenko
You’re lucky that they cut me off when they did otherwise I’d have knocked your backwards way of thinking back into last Tuesday.
They cut you off for a reason - HTH
Yeah the reason being that Stam had come to speak with them at that point you spastic
by genome » 23 Dec 2017 21:05
by Hound » 23 Dec 2017 21:07
by wiggso » 23 Dec 2017 21:14
by Snowflake Royal » 23 Dec 2017 21:21
Hound I actually thought Swift did drive us forward a bit. He wasn’t brilliant but he got on the ball and got it out to the flanks. Would have brought him on for Kelly. Bod should have come on at half time, certainly no later than 60 mins
I wouldn’t agree there was no movement up front - Moore picked out a couple of lovely balls to Bacuna and Barrow is constantly moving. It’s hard to get in behind when they are sitting so deep though which is where you expect the likes of Kelly to ping into the forwards feet
Was whinging on to my son for the last half hour about bringing McCleary on. Replaced the awful and positionally clueless Aluko and could have possibly played RWB to allow Bacuna into midfield, or full on right wing.
Users browsing this forum: Mr Angry, WestYorksRoyal and 248 guests