by Sutekh » 02 Jun 2018 20:32
by Sanguine » 04 Jun 2018 10:21
Sutekh
And as for 2030, be interesting to see who England get stitched up by for that one (though if they pitch any bid to include the British Isles as a whole it might be impossible to turn down).
by genome » 04 Jun 2018 10:50
by Sanguine » 04 Jun 2018 12:13
by stealthpapes » 04 Jun 2018 15:16
by Sanguine » 04 Jun 2018 15:23
stealthpapes 2030 should be a south american one, if you think about it for more than a split second.
by RG30 » 11 Jun 2018 22:52
Sanguinestealthpapes 2030 should be a south american one, if you think about it for more than a split second.
A joint Uruguayan/Argentinian bid is the only confirmed runner so far. And yes, it would make absolute sense.
Interestingly*, reading about the process on Wiki, I hadn't realised that early this decade FIFA formally withdrew their fixed continental rotation policy.
by Stranded » 12 Jun 2018 08:45
Stranded So assuming 2026 goes to North America, I assume the US, Canada and Mexico will each get a host berth each?
Just the other 45 spots to fill then.
by Sutekh » 12 Jun 2018 14:44
Old Man AndrewsStranded So assuming 2026 goes to North America, I assume the US, Canada and Mexico will each get a host berth each?
Just the other 45 spots to fill then.
The 48 team World Cup has been shelved btw. https://inews.co.uk/sport/football/worl ... world-cup/
SutekhOld Man AndrewsStranded So assuming 2026 goes to North America, I assume the US, Canada and Mexico will each get a host berth each?
Just the other 45 spots to fill then.
The 48 team World Cup has been shelved btw. https://inews.co.uk/sport/football/worl ... world-cup/
That report is about the 48 team format being dumped for Qatar in 2022 which I don't think was ever serious goer anyway given that Qatar can barely cope with 32 let alone 48. As far a I'm aware 48 teams is still on for 2026.
by Stranded » 12 Jun 2018 15:14
Old Man AndrewsSutekhOld Man Andrews
The 48 team World Cup has been shelved btw. https://inews.co.uk/sport/football/worl ... world-cup/
That report is about the 48 team format being dumped for Qatar in 2022 which I don't think was ever serious goer anyway given that Qatar can barely cope with 32 let alone 48. As far a I'm aware 48 teams is still on for 2026.
Ugh, really hope not. The current World Cup format isn't even slightly broken, why try to fix it?
by Stranded » 13 Jun 2018 08:54
Old Man AndrewsSutekhOld Man Andrews
The 48 team World Cup has been shelved btw. https://inews.co.uk/sport/football/worl ... world-cup/
That report is about the 48 team format being dumped for Qatar in 2022 which I don't think was ever serious goer anyway given that Qatar can barely cope with 32 let alone 48. As far a I'm aware 48 teams is still on for 2026.
Ugh, really hope not. The current World Cup format isn't even slightly broken, why try to fix it?
by Sutekh » 13 Jun 2018 09:20
StrandedOld Man AndrewsSutekh
That report is about the 48 team format being dumped for Qatar in 2022 which I don't think was ever serious goer anyway given that Qatar can barely cope with 32 let alone 48. As far a I'm aware 48 teams is still on for 2026.
Ugh, really hope not. The current World Cup format isn't even slightly broken, why try to fix it?
Thinking about it the only thing I would change is having a draw for the knock out stages. Probably not massively doable when played in large countries such as Russia but would work brilliantly in Qatar.
Group stage finishes. 1st place teams get to face a 2nd place side but a free draw. Could make it that you can't play the team from your group in the round of 16 if needed but I'd just go with a free draw and see what happens.
by Sutekh » 13 Jun 2018 09:29
Old Man Andrews Would anyone be against a "Consolation Cup"? The knocked out group stage teams go through and battle it out for the consolation trophy. More games, more money being spent, bigger TV audiences.
SutekhOld Man Andrews Would anyone be against a "Consolation Cup"? The knocked out group stage teams go through and battle it out for the consolation trophy. More games, more money being spent, bigger TV audiences.
In for that! England still wouldn't win anything though.
by Winston Biscuit » 13 Jun 2018 10:56
By most objective metrics the United Bid is superior. Fifa’s task force, which inspected each bid across a range of infrastructural and commercial elements, gave it a score of 402.8 out of 500 (compared to 274.9 for Morocco). The North American bid also promises to generate a profit of £8.1bn for Fifa, nearly twice Morocco’s projected haul of £4.48bn.
by genome » 13 Jun 2018 11:25
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 118 guests