by Silver Fox » 28 Jun 2018 16:22
by CountryRoyal » 28 Jun 2018 16:23
Winston BiscuitHoop BlahWinston Biscuit tempted to stick some money on Croatia reaching the final
For me Croatia have been one of the most impressive sides so far.
I actually think they are probably the most impressive (in a WC where no team has really wowed us). Not spectacular but go about their business solidly with quality players. Will be very hard to beat imo.
can you think of a midfield partnership that you would rather swap into their team in place of Modric & Rakitic? nope
by Winston Biscuit » 28 Jun 2018 16:24
CountryRoyalWinston BiscuitHoop Blah
For me Croatia have been one of the most impressive sides so far.
I actually think they are probably the most impressive (in a WC where no team has really wowed us). Not spectacular but go about their business solidly with quality players. Will be very hard to beat imo.
can you think of a midfield partnership that you would rather swap into their team in place of Modric & Rakitic? nope
Think France and Brazil have a few decent midfielders knocking about.
by stealthpapes » 28 Jun 2018 16:58
by Uke » 28 Jun 2018 16:59
Ark RoyalWinston Biscuit tempted to stick some money on Croatia reaching the final
Best team I have seen so far.
by LUX » 28 Jun 2018 17:02
by bcubed » 28 Jun 2018 17:05
Old Man Andrews Would bloody love England to get Japan in the next round. We'll dick them.
by CountryRoyal » 28 Jun 2018 17:14
bcubedOld Man Andrews Would bloody love England to get Japan in the next round. We'll dick them.
Just need to win the group then now.
by bcubed » 28 Jun 2018 17:20
CountryRoyalbcubedOld Man Andrews Would bloody love England to get Japan in the next round. We'll dick them.
Just need to win the group then now.
It seems the most likely scenario.
by Snowflake Royal » 28 Jun 2018 18:03
Didn't the ref look at it again and change his own decision, from what people are saying?Sanguine It's the 'clear and obvious' bit that is causing some issues, isn't it?
In cricket, anything reviewed that is marginal goes with the umpire's original call. And that should have been the case with this one - yes he got the ball, yes it was from the side (ish), but if you slow it right down he contacts the leg before he does the ball. Even if you disagree on that last point, this was not a 'clear and obvious error' (i.e. there was definitely no foul), and the penalty should have stood.
by Winston Biscuit » 28 Jun 2018 19:53
by AthleticoSpizz » 28 Jun 2018 20:15
by Royal Rother » 28 Jun 2018 22:48
by BR0B0T » 28 Jun 2018 22:57
Royal Rother Best moment of the WC so far in the England Belgium game.
Michy Batshuayi. You absolute bellend! Picking up the ball after they’d scored then belting it as hard as he could into the back of the net from a foot out, missing the target, hitting the post instead and taking a whack in the face as it rebounded from about a yard away..... I cried, I have to say!
That joins into the list of biggest football bellylaughs, all in WCs., the others being Brazil letting in 5 goals in about 20 minutes in front of their own fans in 2014, and Scotland drawing with Iran in 1978.
by Pepe the Horseman » 28 Jun 2018 23:02
LUX Croatia (who I have backed btw) won all three games in the Group of Death, including beating Argentina 3-0.
BR0B0TRoyal Rother Best moment of the WC so far in the England Belgium game.
That joins into the list of biggest football bellylaughs, all in WCs., the others being Brazil letting in 5 goals in about 20 minutes in front of their own fans in 2014, and Scotland drawing with Iran in 1978.
by Sanguine » 29 Jun 2018 08:40
Snowflake RoyalDidn't the ref look at it again and change his own decision, from what people are saying?Sanguine It's the 'clear and obvious' bit that is causing some issues, isn't it?
In cricket, anything reviewed that is marginal goes with the umpire's original call. And that should have been the case with this one - yes he got the ball, yes it was from the side (ish), but if you slow it right down he contacts the leg before he does the ball. Even if you disagree on that last point, this was not a 'clear and obvious error' (i.e. there was definitely no foul), and the penalty should have stood.
If that's the case, then clearly the ref agreed he got it wrong, so it's not like it was unfairly overturning something ambiguous, it'd mean what he thought he saw wasn't actually what happened.
In which case it's nothing like cricket.
by Hoop Blah » 29 Jun 2018 09:41
by Green » 29 Jun 2018 10:39
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 113 guests