by lightning strikes » 27 Oct 2018 21:46
by Royal_jimmy » 27 Oct 2018 22:23
by Denver Royal » 27 Oct 2018 22:32
by lightning strikes » 27 Oct 2018 23:32
Denver Royal Us not conceding a 2nd goal (if we had equalized) is an assumption that cannot be proven. It’s a common trait in here. It’s like saying if we had scored 2 goals we would therefor have got a point. And yet, we don’t know that, either. The flow of a game subsequently, and certainly its result, after a supposed event, cannot be predicted with any certainty. Swans could have thrown men forward, at 2-2, and maybe got a winner. It’s conjecture.
by Millsy » 28 Oct 2018 00:09
by Hound » 28 Oct 2018 06:55
by Sutekh » 28 Oct 2018 07:24
by Hound » 28 Oct 2018 08:10
by Snowflake Royal » 28 Oct 2018 08:16
by Royality creeps In » 28 Oct 2018 10:09
by Victor Meldrew » 28 Oct 2018 10:49
Royality creeps In As much as I am pretty miffed about our current plight. With a little luck we could have had something out of yesterday.
The penalty was pretty soft and we had a goal given offside from a corner It was up the other end but Its difficult to see how it was offside.
Their other goal was after Baldock scuffed a volley and they went up the other end and scored. On another day Baldock's shot would have gone in and things would be different today.
Swansea had a couple of shots that forced Annsi into a save. They were nothing special. They had a little winger that caused Yiadom problems and a typical lower league lump at front. He just bullied his way around and somehow scored both their goals
Thought O'shea was better that Illori (Never thought I would say that) although he did make a few errors.
Meite had a few headers that went everywhere except goal bound.
Oh and the ref. What an absolute tool! Little man syndrome I reckon. Gave us the square root of Zilch all afternoon
by CountryRoyal » 28 Oct 2018 10:51
Snowflake Royal This side won't finish in the top half of the Championship again without being relegated and promoted.
We're going down and no amount of manager change is going to stop that, the problem us the squad. Too many mediocre or subsrandard players and even the good ones have no mental strength and are used to losingn
by Snowflake Royal » 28 Oct 2018 11:07
CountryRoyalSnowflake Royal This side won't finish in the top half of the Championship again without being relegated and promoted.
We're going down and no amount of manager change is going to stop that, the problem us the squad. Too many mediocre or subsrandard players and even the good ones have no mental strength and are used to losingn
Shocking recruitment particularly the last few seasons.
by cp » 28 Oct 2018 11:38
by SCIAG » 28 Oct 2018 12:02
Snowflake RoyalCountryRoyalSnowflake Royal I maintain this summer was a step in the right direction, but the previous two or three where wed bring in 13 new players and bet on talented wasters suddenly changing their spots were awful.
God I miss Hammond.
by Snowflake Royal » 28 Oct 2018 12:26
SCIAGSnowflake RoyalCountryRoyal
Tevreden's first summer was probably our best since the one before the 106 season - Beerens, Joey, Swift, Moore, Harriott, and Blackett all proved to be shrewd acquisitions. There were some shots in the dark which didn't come off but I don't have a problem with that. Don't think Wieser or Gravenberch did us any harm.
Think this summer unfortunately has to go down as our worst for a long time. Meyler in particular was signed as an upgrade on Evans and Joey but so far as failed horrifically. The result is a hugely unbalanced squad. We're also trying to play with a lone striker despite two of our three strikers not being suited to it, so an excess winger is leading the line while one of our strikers plays on the wing. Our two best full backs are both right backs.
Meyler out for Evans, Aluko out for Sims, McNulty out for Novakovich, and Obita fit, and this squad would be looking really good. But there are too many square pegs right now.
by Zip » 28 Oct 2018 13:10
cp I went along expecting the worst and it wasn't as big a thrashing as I feared. I was down quite close to the action (in Swansea end, since I went with a local) and one thing became clear, as soon as a Reading player received the ball Swansea had 1 or often 2 players on him straight away, with no time at all to settle.
But when a Swansea player got the ball Reading players would initially run over to him and then back away every time, allowing the Swansea player to choose his next pass.
It doesn't seen to require more skill than we have to simply hustle the opposition and not allow them the time to play, especially if they rely on a passing game as Swansea does.
But what do I know compared to the manager.
by Snowflake Royal » 28 Oct 2018 13:36
Zipcp I went along expecting the worst and it wasn't as big a thrashing as I feared. I was down quite close to the action (in Swansea end, since I went with a local) and one thing became clear, as soon as a Reading player received the ball Swansea had 1 or often 2 players on him straight away, with no time at all to settle.
But when a Swansea player got the ball Reading players would initially run over to him and then back away every time, allowing the Swansea player to choose his next pass.
It doesn't seen to require more skill than we have to simply hustle the opposition and not allow them the time to play, especially if they rely on a passing game as Swansea does.
But what do I know compared to the manager.
Absolutely this. It has been noticeable that in most games were are being closed down by the opposition very quickly. Yet opposition players seem to have more time on the ball. In his defence Kelly did close down Millwall players in the second half last week but he was the only one doing it.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 165 guests