paultheroyal This is a done deal, finances are not an issue (well they are but resolved in July) - this will get over the line as we hit early July.
This man is itk.
Ever thought of working at the Reading post, Paul?
by royalp-we » 24 Jun 2019 17:52
paultheroyal This is a done deal, finances are not an issue (well they are but resolved in July) - this will get over the line as we hit early July.
by Snowflake Royal » 24 Jun 2019 17:53
StrandedHoundpaultheroyal This is a done deal, finances are not an issue (well they are but resolved in July) - this will get over the line as we hit early July.
interesting. And will it be followed by further signings?
Would be more than happy with Oliveira, but the GK, CM and CB positions are far more urgent imo. Can't believe we'd spend any budget we may have on a striker alone
I'm assuming we'll get in a couple of loans which will also come through fairly soon
Football account reporting periods end 30th June. We are under this soft embargo as there is clearly a concern that we may breach the FFP limits if we spend more money (without bringing some in) before this date.
As of end of 2017/18, our 3 year rolling losses were -31m. As of July 1st, the 2015/16 loss of 15m drops off the calculation - our 2 year loss is then 25.6m, so we can swallow a 2018/19 loss of 13.3m and still meet the rules. We must be close to this hence the lack of movement.
Bigger issues are:
the 2016/17 loss was only 4.6m which doesn't give a lot of wiggle room for 2019/20 (assuming we are close to FFP this year) to ensure we meet FFP at the end of this upcoming season plus our wages to income ratio stands at nearly 200% which is unsustainable and needs to be reduced. So throughout July we will hopefully see incomings but still expect outgoings to try and lower the wage bill and ensure we are not in a worse position next summer.
by Stranded » 24 Jun 2019 21:21
Snowflake RoyalStrandedHound
interesting. And will it be followed by further signings?
Would be more than happy with Oliveira, but the GK, CM and CB positions are far more urgent imo. Can't believe we'd spend any budget we may have on a striker alone
I'm assuming we'll get in a couple of loans which will also come through fairly soon
Football account reporting periods end 30th June. We are under this soft embargo as there is clearly a concern that we may breach the FFP limits if we spend more money (without bringing some in) before this date.
As of end of 2017/18, our 3 year rolling losses were -31m. As of July 1st, the 2015/16 loss of 15m drops off the calculation - our 2 year loss is then 25.6m, so we can swallow a 2018/19 loss of 13.3m and still meet the rules. We must be close to this hence the lack of movement.
Bigger issues are:
the 2016/17 loss was only 4.6m which doesn't give a lot of wiggle room for 2019/20 (assuming we are close to FFP this year) to ensure we meet FFP at the end of this upcoming season plus our wages to income ratio stands at nearly 200% which is unsustainable and needs to be reduced. So throughout July we will hopefully see incomings but still expect outgoings to try and lower the wage bill and ensure we are not in a worse position next summer.
It was actually profit wasn't it. The 4 .6 in 16/17. Which is even worse
by Snowflake Royal » 24 Jun 2019 22:11
StrandedSnowflake RoyalStranded
Football account reporting periods end 30th June. We are under this soft embargo as there is clearly a concern that we may breach the FFP limits if we spend more money (without bringing some in) before this date.
As of end of 2017/18, our 3 year rolling losses were -31m. As of July 1st, the 2015/16 loss of 15m drops off the calculation - our 2 year loss is then 25.6m, so we can swallow a 2018/19 loss of 13.3m and still meet the rules. We must be close to this hence the lack of movement.
Bigger issues are:
the 2016/17 loss was only 4.6m which doesn't give a lot of wiggle room for 2019/20 (assuming we are close to FFP this year) to ensure we meet FFP at the end of this upcoming season plus our wages to income ratio stands at nearly 200% which is unsustainable and needs to be reduced. So throughout July we will hopefully see incomings but still expect outgoings to try and lower the wage bill and ensure we are not in a worse position next summer.
It was actually profit wasn't it. The 4 .6 in 16/17. Which is even worse
You are right, misread the profit as loss. So the 2 years before this we have lost circa 16m. So if we have lost close to 23m this year, we need to make a profit this.
by DOYLERSAROYALER » 25 Jun 2019 06:44
by Hound » 25 Jun 2019 07:41
Snowflake RoyalStrandedSnowflake Royal It was actually profit wasn't it. The 4 .6 in 16/17. Which is even worse
You are right, misread the profit as loss. So the 2 years before this we have lost circa 16m. So if we have lost close to 23m this year, we need to make a profit this.
My hope is January made 18/19 less bad than 17/18, so down from -£20m ish to -£15m ish seems reasonable.
Might explain why Gourlay was delaying so much over Moore's contract... panicking and trying to keep costs down without admitting how much he'd oxf*rd up.
But anyway, if it is in the £15-18m territory, we've basically got to almost break even this season. Which from -£15m is a helluva tall order. If we got last season down to closer to -£10m we're in a much better state as we only need to bring it down another 2-3 mil. But I fear the soft embargo and our current caution suggests it was a fair bit higher than £10m.
A cup run or PO (fat chance) campaign would do wonders for us. Nice juicy draw and replay with Utd, City or Liverpool.
by Stranded » 25 Jun 2019 08:19
HoundSnowflake RoyalStranded
You are right, misread the profit as loss. So the 2 years before this we have lost circa 16m. So if we have lost close to 23m this year, we need to make a profit this.
My hope is January made 18/19 less bad than 17/18, so down from -£20m ish to -£15m ish seems reasonable.
Might explain why Gourlay was delaying so much over Moore's contract... panicking and trying to keep costs down without admitting how much he'd oxf*rd up.
But anyway, if it is in the £15-18m territory, we've basically got to almost break even this season. Which from -£15m is a helluva tall order. If we got last season down to closer to -£10m we're in a much better state as we only need to bring it down another 2-3 mil. But I fear the soft embargo and our current caution suggests it was a fair bit higher than £10m.
A cup run or PO (fat chance) campaign would do wonders for us. Nice juicy draw and replay with Utd, City or Liverpool.
Reckon we prob lost 10m ish last year, but that did include brining in 6m for Ilori and Bacuna
So we probably need to cut 10m from the wage bill (the released players should help that) and sell another 5-6m worth of player
Could really do with Renhe snapping up Aluko for a hefty fee
by Hound » 25 Jun 2019 08:38
by genome » 25 Jun 2019 09:27
by Millsy » 25 Jun 2019 09:56
by Hound » 25 Jun 2019 10:02
genome It's probably a case of "who wants to buy them?"
Knowing Gourlay, the likes of Meyler and Baldock are probably on far too much money.
by CountryRoyal » 25 Jun 2019 10:34
genome It's probably a case of "who wants to buy them?"
Knowing Gourlay, the likes of Meyler and Baldock are probably on far too much money.
by Snowflake Royal » 25 Jun 2019 10:41
Hound as ever, depends on who we can sell/get rid of without having to pay up
I am a little surprised we've got no-one bar Ward out of the door yet
The soft embargo is a slightly strange one - if we made 4.6 in 16/17, lost 20 in 17/18, we'd have had to have lost almost 25m this past season to be actually breaking the rules. Can't see we lost that much
by West Stand Man » 26 Jun 2019 09:18
DOYLERSAROYALER Norwich have just signed a new Swiss international striker from Germany, so that knocks Oliveira even further down the pecking order.
Hopefully, the further down he goes the pecking order, the more likely the want and urgency to do so by Norwich to get him off their books will be..time will tell
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 34 guests