by Notts Royal » 06 Aug 2019 10:56
by Millsy » 06 Aug 2019 11:01
by Millsy » 06 Aug 2019 11:01
by paultheroyal » 06 Aug 2019 11:11
by Greatwesternline » 06 Aug 2019 11:31
by Nameless » 06 Aug 2019 11:38
Notts Royal Personally would prefer us to give Nova a decent run of games there, but £5m I suppose is the going rate...João seems to have the right attributes. Didn’t realise he was so young either so there’s room for improvement
Either way it’ll strengthen us which is important
by Hound » 06 Aug 2019 11:38
by Rollerbob » 06 Aug 2019 11:51
Greatwesternline If he doesnt perform, which isn't that hard to imagine, we now have potentially no room for maneuver in January.
by Greatwesternline » 06 Aug 2019 12:09
RollerbobGreatwesternline If he doesnt perform, which isn't that hard to imagine, we now have potentially no room for maneuver in January.
With that logic, January signings might not perform. If Gomes and his scouting team reckon he'll be a good acquisition, then I'm inclined to trust him/them. As others have pointed out; he will improve the squad.
by Greatwesternline » 06 Aug 2019 12:14
Hound not sure anyone (with any sense) said Hector makes it cheaper, just that we won't be paying much for him this season
what it maybe did mean, is by signing Joao it meant Sheff Weds could afford Hector, hence it might be money we wouldn't have got if Chelsea had held onto him and kept loaning him out until he became ooc
by Nameless » 06 Aug 2019 12:18
GreatwesternlineRollerbobGreatwesternline If he doesnt perform, which isn't that hard to imagine, we now have potentially no room for maneuver in January.
With that logic, January signings might not perform. If Gomes and his scouting team reckon he'll be a good acquisition, then I'm inclined to trust him/them. As others have pointed out; he will improve the squad.
That's what people said about Aluko and Bacuna. If we have £5m to spend, why couldnt we take on loan more of the 5 superb loanees who kept us up last season?
by Nameless » 06 Aug 2019 12:28
StellaPlease But I thought Paul said Oliviera was a 100% done deal?
by Royal_jimmy » 06 Aug 2019 12:36
by Basildon » 06 Aug 2019 12:43
StellaPlease But I thought Paul said Oliviera was a 100% done deal?
NamelessStellaPlease But I thought Paul said Oliviera was a 100% done deal?
And probably any reasonable person would understand what he meant by that and why it didn’t happen.
by Nameless » 06 Aug 2019 12:49
StellaPleaseNamelessStellaPlease But I thought Paul said Oliviera was a 100% done deal?
And probably any reasonable person would understand what he meant by that and why it didn’t happen.
Nope, a 100% done deal means that nothing can stop it.
It didn't happen.
Anyway, happy to leave it now, as long as he doesn't come back on here with the pretence of actually being in the know.
NamelessStellaPleaseNameless
And probably any reasonable person would understand what he meant by that and why it didn’t happen.
Nope, a 100% done deal means that nothing can stop it.
It didn't happen.
Anyway, happy to leave it now, as long as he doesn't come back on here with the pretence of actually being in the know.
I did have a ‘reasonable’ caveat.......
by Hound » 06 Aug 2019 12:57
Hound give it a rest man. We all know the NO circumstances - would probably have happened if we'd managed to sell off some players quicker. Paul is as reliable as any on here
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 259 guests