Snowflake RoyalleonSnowflake Royal I'm colour blind.
Blacks not a colour Ian and you know it.
I didn't realise, because I'm colour blind.
Black is not a colour but a shade.
by The Enfield Royal71 » 07 Aug 2019 07:46
Snowflake RoyalleonSnowflake Royal I'm colour blind.
Blacks not a colour Ian and you know it.
I didn't realise, because I'm colour blind.
by NotARacist » 07 Aug 2019 07:52
The Enfield Royal71Snowflake Royalleon Blacks not a colour Ian and you know it.
I didn't realise, because I'm colour blind.
Black is not a colour but a shade.
by Snowflake Royal » 07 Aug 2019 07:59
NotARacistThe Enfield Royal71Snowflake Royal I didn't realise, because I'm colour blind.
Black is not a colour but a shade.
I think, technically, black is all colours.
by NotARacist » 07 Aug 2019 08:01
Snowflake RoyalNotARacistThe Enfield Royal71
Black is not a colour but a shade.
I think, technically, black is all colours.
Can't believe I have to do this. Black is the absence of colour, where all wavelengths are absorbed. White is all wavelengths reflected, so all colours.
Black is a shade.... oxf*rd me.
by Snowflake Royal » 07 Aug 2019 08:03
NotARacistSnowflake RoyalNotARacist I think, technically, black is all colours.
Can't believe I have to do this. Black is the absence of colour, where all wavelengths are absorbed. White is all wavelengths reflected, so all colours.
Black is a shade.... oxf*rd me.
Wait. You sure? I thought black absorbs all colours without reflecting them back. Hence it is all colours. Whereas white reflects all colours making it the absence of colour.
by The Enfield Royal71 » 07 Aug 2019 08:06
Snowflake RoyalNotARacistThe Enfield Royal71
Black is not a colour but a shade.
I think, technically, black is all colours.
Can't believe I have to do this. Black is the absence of colour, where all wavelengths are absorbed. White is all wavelengths reflected, so all colours.
Black is a shade.... oxf*rd me.
by NotARacist » 07 Aug 2019 08:07
Snowflake RoyalNotARacistSnowflake Royal Can't believe I have to do this. Black is the absence of colour, where all wavelengths are absorbed. White is all wavelengths reflected, so all colours.
Black is a shade.... oxf*rd me.
Wait. You sure? I thought black absorbs all colours without reflecting them back. Hence it is all colours. Whereas white reflects all colours making it the absence of colour.
Right description, wrong conclusion. Googling 'dark side of the moon album cover' may help.
by Snowflake Royal » 07 Aug 2019 08:11
NotARacistSnowflake RoyalNotARacist Wait. You sure? I thought black absorbs all colours without reflecting them back. Hence it is all colours. Whereas white reflects all colours making it the absence of colour.
Right description, wrong conclusion. Googling 'dark side of the moon album cover' may help.
Darn. Never was good at physics. I assume this is physics. Somehow.
by Davezk » 07 Aug 2019 08:13
by Sutekh » 07 Aug 2019 08:17
Snowflake RoyalNotARacistSnowflake Royal Can't believe I have to do this. Black is the absence of colour, where all wavelengths are absorbed. White is all wavelengths reflected, so all colours.
Black is a shade.... oxf*rd me.
Wait. You sure? I thought black absorbs all colours without reflecting them back. Hence it is all colours. Whereas white reflects all colours making it the absence of colour.
Right description, wrong conclusion. Googling 'dark side of the moon album cover' may help.
by NotARacist » 07 Aug 2019 08:20
SutekhSnowflake RoyalNotARacist Wait. You sure? I thought black absorbs all colours without reflecting them back. Hence it is all colours. Whereas white reflects all colours making it the absence of colour.
Right description, wrong conclusion. Googling 'dark side of the moon album cover' may help.
by Millsy » 07 Aug 2019 10:18
Snowflake Royal2 world wars, 1 world cup Argh...
I'm not going to take this groundhog day 'joke' too far or I'll end up ruining the thread, which to be I do even when I'm trying to be serious (!).
Someone a few pages back mentioned groundhog day so I copied an pasted. I've never heard of the guy, have no idea what the original poster meant by Aluko 2.0 either. No-one can be as big a flop as Aluko was surely.
At least one person got that you were taking the piss.
by Millsy » 07 Aug 2019 10:24
by WoodleyRoyal » 07 Aug 2019 10:29
2 world wars, 1 world cup Will everyone stop being so damned racist. Apart from notaracist, because he can't be.
I had to recheck, but this is the Joao who scored in a 10 man team against us. Clearly can't be shit.
Now we've signed him, do you think we are able to appeal and have that goal awarded to us retrospectively now that he's a Reading player?
by Millsy » 07 Aug 2019 10:29
WoodleyRoyal2 world wars, 1 world cup Will everyone stop being so damned racist. Apart from notaracist, because he can't be.
I had to recheck, but this is the Joao who scored in a 10 man team against us. Clearly can't be shit.
Now we've signed him, do you think we are able to appeal and have that goal awarded to us retrospectively now that he's a Reading player?
Yes.
by NotARacist » 07 Aug 2019 10:34
2 world wars, 1 world cup Will everyone stop being so damned racist. Apart from notaracist, because he can't be.
I had to recheck, but this is the Joao who scored in a 10 man team against us. Clearly can't be shit.
Now we've signed him, do you think we are able to appeal and have that goal awarded to us retrospectively now that he's a Reading player?
by Sanguine » 07 Aug 2019 10:37
by Tilehurstsouthbank » 07 Aug 2019 10:50
Snowflake Royal2 world wars, 1 world cup Argh...
I'm not going to take this groundhog day 'joke' too far or I'll end up ruining the thread, which to be I do even when I'm trying to be serious (!).
Someone a few pages back mentioned groundhog day so I copied an pasted. I've never heard of the guy, have no idea what the original poster meant by Aluko 2.0 either. No-one can be as big a flop as Aluko was surely.
At least one person got that you were taking the piss.
by Nameless » 07 Aug 2019 10:50
2 world wars, 1 world cup Will everyone stop being so damned racist. Apart from notaracist, because he can't be.
I had to recheck, but this is the Joao who scored in a 10 man team against us. Clearly can't be shit.
Now we've signed him, do you think we are able to appeal and have that goal awarded to us retrospectively now that he's a Reading player?
by Davezk » 07 Aug 2019 10:51
2 world wars, 1 world cup I had to recheck, but this is the Joao who scored in a 10 man team against us.
Users browsing this forum: Armadillo Roadkill, Dave the rave, RFC and England and 194 guests