by Hound »
08 Aug 2019 13:28
Greatwesternline winchester_royal Greatwesternline Scoff all you want. In the season 2018-19, Reading's total revenue was £17m.
https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/00053703/filing-history Page 9 of this years accounts.
We've just spent, if it is to be believed, £8m on one player. That's sheer madness. If we have so much money, why dont we have a manager who has achieved anything at any level in any football league anywhere in the world. Why didn't we re-sign the players who we loaned last season who were very successful.
If we have so much money why is our CB partnership still Moore and Miazga, and our CM partnership Rino and Swift. Much as it was last season for the second half of the year. I feel no different to a QPR fan when they spent much much more money than they could ever hope to generate. The only difference being, the basically bought a tried and tested PL player in every position. We havent done that. Happy to the voice of gloom, but we've spent the best part of an entire year's revenue on 4 new players, lets not even start to think about wages. And i dont personally think it will be sufficient to win the league, or come second. In which case, good bye RFC.
Thank you for demonstrating my point. You’re leaping to a load of conclusions based on nothing but hearsay and a complete lack of understanding of how football club accounting works.
If you’re going to worry about the accounting implications of every move the club makes going forwards you’re going to be a very miserable man. Football is all about escapism, enjoy the ambition the club is showing and allow yourself to dream a little. You’ll be much happier as a result.
I have the understanding, i just dont want to see the club screwed, just like it was less than 2 months ago. Supposedly. Why is everyone happy with new expensive signings, when 2 months ago, they were berating those who signed Aluko. Its weird.
its not weird, they are completely different players. Joao and Puscas are a lot younger, a lot more potential and a lot more chance of a sell on fee. If we could have sold Aluko on - even at say a 2m loss, it wouldn't have been a major issue. Its the fact we are stuck with an ageing player, without a set position, on a huge contract that is the issue.
You also have to pay bigger fees for strikers, than random winger/ACM/number 10s, who we didn't need in the first place
Even in the worst case of Puscas being completely useless this year, we'd be able to sell back on for a reasonable fee somewhere based on his career so far. Joao as well probably.