by Zip » 02 Oct 2019 18:37
by Snowflake Royal » 02 Oct 2019 19:21
by Hound » 02 Oct 2019 19:26
by Snowflake Royal » 02 Oct 2019 19:28
Hound His back foot goes from underneath him, hence why his leg flies up in the air
How I saw it anyway. But yes can see why it was given
by Zip » 02 Oct 2019 19:33
by Hound » 02 Oct 2019 19:59
Snowflake RoyalHound His back foot goes from underneath him, hence why his leg flies up in the air
How I saw it anyway. But yes can see why it was given
I think that's generous.
by Platypuss » 02 Oct 2019 20:10
Zip As soon as Swift lunged in I knew he was off. A complete idiot.
by Zip » 02 Oct 2019 20:22
PlatypussZip As soon as Swift lunged in I knew he was off. A complete idiot.
Gomes' fault again of course.
by Hound » 02 Oct 2019 20:51
by Zip » 02 Oct 2019 21:07
by Jack Celliers » 02 Oct 2019 21:25
by SCIAG » 02 Oct 2019 21:28
PlatypussZip As soon as Swift lunged in I knew he was off. A complete idiot.
Gomes' fault again of course.
by bcubed » 02 Oct 2019 21:29
Zip What annoyed me about Andy Woolmer was his unwillingness to book a single Fulham player. Just how many times did they kick the ball away? .
Add in deliberate handballs by the same player yet nothing was said let alone the brandishing of any cards.
by Millsy » 02 Oct 2019 23:03
Zip We have employed a third successive manager who wants us to play out from the back when we don’t have the personnel to do it.
Rafael is a poor distributor of the ball. None of our defenders last night are good passers of the ball. They are so slow at moving the ball forward.
The problem is then compounded by our midfielders who often take far too long to release the ball and regularly cut back inside with momentum being lost. Compare this with how Fulham play. Quick, first time passes and excellent movement to go with it.
When you are at home on a poor run playing a footballing team surely you expect the players to press hard. Yet we stood back and allowed Fulham to play.
We need to go back to scratch. With Swift unavailable on Saturday Gomes can play Pele at CDM, Rinomhota as a CM and Ejaria at ACM. That should make us harder to break down but the whole style of play has to be addressed. We must move the ball forward more quickly and we should close down far more quickly and stop the ridiculous marking of space which leaves opposition players with loads of space at times.
by URZZZZ » 02 Oct 2019 23:09
2 world wars, 1 world cupZip We have employed a third successive manager who wants us to play out from the back when we don’t have the personnel to do it.
Rafael is a poor distributor of the ball. None of our defenders last night are good passers of the ball. They are so slow at moving the ball forward.
The problem is then compounded by our midfielders who often take far too long to release the ball and regularly cut back inside with momentum being lost. Compare this with how Fulham play. Quick, first time passes and excellent movement to go with it.
When you are at home on a poor run playing a footballing team surely you expect the players to press hard. Yet we stood back and allowed Fulham to play.
We need to go back to scratch. With Swift unavailable on Saturday Gomes can play Pele at CDM, Rinomhota as a CM and Ejaria at ACM. That should make us harder to break down but the whole style of play has to be addressed. We must move the ball forward more quickly and we should close down far more quickly and stop the ridiculous marking of space which leaves opposition players with loads of space at times.
Good point Zip. Even with Stamball or Gomeslottery at its best, playing it out at the back has always looked dodgy. Almost every game there are dodgy moments. What often happens is they press high, we try to play it out from the back , we panic hit it back to keeper who just smashes it up field anyway. Or one of our defenders decides to do that.
by Millsy » 02 Oct 2019 23:21
tmesis One problem with the "we need to stick with first XI/formation ideas - we have too many players who have one or two good games, then fade away. The successful formations stop being successful because players need dropping so often. How many players do we really have now who'd look definite first-teamers? There are many who ought to be, but they just aren't performing.
by morganb » 02 Oct 2019 23:36
by Notts Royal » 02 Oct 2019 23:39
by URZZZZ » 03 Oct 2019 00:10
Notts Royal
What I liked about him last season was he stuck with the same team more or less. This season it doesn’t look like he has a clue what his best team is.
by Snowflake Royal » 03 Oct 2019 07:17
2 world wars, 1 world cuptmesis One problem with the "we need to stick with first XI/formation ideas - we have too many players who have one or two good games, then fade away. The successful formations stop being successful because players need dropping so often. How many players do we really have now who'd look definite first-teamers? There are many who ought to be, but they just aren't performing.
That may well be true, but in my opinion (of course goes without saying could be wrong, I just like discussing ) is we can't just keep jumping around with formations following player form because we can guarantee every player will have off days and we'll forever be chasing shadows. I can think of very few games where everyone is on form anyway so if he's been trying to catch everyone in form it's just not worked. We'll be forever chasing shadows.
A new and confusing formation affects the whole team but 2-3 or three bad players can be mitigated by a good team performance. It takes many games for players to be totally in tune with any particular formation without even thinking about it. Just instinctively know they can pass into a certain space and someone will be there, or what is more likely to happen statistically if they pump a ball into a certain space, based on an a subconscious memory of the 100s of times they've tried that same pass in a similar situation in previous games. You can get players to intellectually understand a system before a game but in the heat of the moment with the pressure on you, shattered and confused, and the opposition flying in to crush your shins you're not going to remember and you're going to hoof it, pass it back, dither or just do something selfish or stupid. We are seeing exactly this all the time. How many times have we heard Gomes say that he just doesn't understand why the players don't do what he told them to do? Is it because they don't intellectually get it? Of course not. There's a difference between your conscious brain understanding something sat in the comfort of your dressing room and your unconscious stressed brain making you do things in a nanosecond on the pitch. The latter needs to be built up only through experience. This is why good teams almost seem like they have a telepathic link. And this is why we make kids do homework: to take something out of the slow conscious brain and embed it into the snappy unconscious so it's second nature in the heat of an exam.
For this reason I'd say the benefits of sticking with a formation and getting the players used to it far outweigh certain players having off days. Everyone knew what Stamball was all about. It was sh*t, but everyone knew their job and it got us a penalty kick away from the PL. Our team now is in my mind infinitely better than Stam's team but the players are confused. They don't know who'll be playing around them. They don't know what formation they'll be playing.
I'm labouring the point, sorry. Don't want to come across as pushy with my opinions.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 117 guests