by Snowflake Royal » 05 Oct 2019 18:29
by SCIAG » 05 Oct 2019 18:32
Snowflake Royal If Hughton is actually interested ditch Gomes now.
But I fear he can and will do better.
by Hound » 05 Oct 2019 18:33
SCIAG I think sacking the manager is both ineffective and not the sort of club I want us to be.
If we can get someone with a proven track record like Hughton or Hughes then that's one thing. But I suspect we'd just get another journeyman off the merry-go-round and be in the same position in 12 months. Stam was our chance to break the cycle but look what happened there.
Let's give someone a chance for once. Imagine if we'd sacked Coppell after that dreadful run in his second season?
by AthleticoSpizz » 05 Oct 2019 18:34
this, let’s give Gomes that chance.SCIAG I think sacking the manager is both ineffective and not the sort of club I want us to be.
If we can get someone with a proven track record like Hughton or Hughes then that's one thing. But I suspect we'd just get another journeyman off the merry-go-round and be in the same position in 12 months. Stam was our chance to break the cycle but look what happened there.
Let's give someone a chance for once. Imagine if we'd sacked Coppell after that dreadful run in his second season?
by royalp-we » 05 Oct 2019 18:51
by BR0B0T » 05 Oct 2019 18:53
WoodleyRoyal Fans getting restless, should he go now? International break coming up....
by Denver Royal » 05 Oct 2019 18:54
Ascotexgunner Its time we had someone who isn't new to English football and management and instead have someone with a proven track record in this country. Ainsworth as second choice.
by Snowflake Royal » 05 Oct 2019 18:54
by AthleticoSpizz » 05 Oct 2019 18:56
by Eaststandman » 05 Oct 2019 18:56
by sandman » 05 Oct 2019 18:57
NewCorkSeth No ian Royal option? No vote then.
by NewCorkSeth » 05 Oct 2019 19:01
sandmanNewCorkSeth No ian Royal option? No vote then.
He'd be a good appointment because he knows it all.
by AthleticoSpizz » 05 Oct 2019 19:01
CH, yes granted...but he’s been sacked time and time again,.Eaststandman Gomes was a surprise appointment and he surprised everybody on the back of a less than spectacular personal history and track record, fair play!
Results and a lack of a worthwhile plan a, b or c indicate that he should not be surprised to receive his P45
CH would be a good, experienced alternative, he talks the talk, walks the walk and deserves the sort of loyalty and backing lesser lights have enjoyed!
Thanks, but Gomes out, sorry!
by AthleticoSpizz » 05 Oct 2019 19:02
sandmanNewCorkSeth No ian Royal option? No vote then.
He'd be a good appointment because he knows it all.
by krapmle » 05 Oct 2019 19:05
by AthleticoSpizz » 05 Oct 2019 19:08
by Snowflake Royal » 05 Oct 2019 19:10
AthleticoSpizz ...and that’s the problem right there.
by Snowflake Royal » 05 Oct 2019 19:12
sandmanNewCorkSeth No ian Royal option? No vote then.
He'd be a good appointment because he knows it all.
by AthleticoSpizz » 05 Oct 2019 19:13
Snowflake RoyalAthleticoSpizz ...and that’s the problem right there.
Not in the case of Gomes, seeing as he actually deserves to go and doesn't look like he could build a sandcastle.
by Snowflake Royal » 05 Oct 2019 19:15
AthleticoSpizzSnowflake RoyalAthleticoSpizz ...and that’s the problem right there.
Not in the case of Gomes, seeing as he actually deserves to go and doesn't look like he could build a sandcastle.
“deserves to go” ?
Anyways...you’ve got my vote already
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 234 guests