by windermereROYAL » 08 Feb 2020 17:58
by Hound » 08 Feb 2020 18:23
by Sutekh » 08 Feb 2020 18:25
by Lower West » 08 Feb 2020 18:31
by URZZZZ » 08 Feb 2020 18:32
Hound Tbh I think the late (lucky) equaliser clouds judgement a little
We weren’t great but we certainly weren’t awful. Just looked tired mentally and physically - and that’s no surprise after the recent workload
Obvs we were all shouting for MB to play a strong team at Cardiff - 120mins later and you get a performance like that
Two main issues for me is Swift and a Ejaria being off their best and back to conceding a sloppy goal every game. We based our successful recent run on basic the opposite of that
by PieEater » 08 Feb 2020 18:45
by NewCorkSeth » 08 Feb 2020 18:45
by Singing Defective » 08 Feb 2020 18:46
Lower West Average performance from an average team. Still a vast improvement on what we were.
by Hound » 08 Feb 2020 19:00
URZZZZHound Tbh I think the late (lucky) equaliser clouds judgement a little
We weren’t great but we certainly weren’t awful. Just looked tired mentally and physically - and that’s no surprise after the recent workload
Obvs we were all shouting for MB to play a strong team at Cardiff - 120mins later and you get a performance like that
Two main issues for me is Swift and a Ejaria being off their best and back to conceding a sloppy goal every game. We based our successful recent run on basic the opposite of that
Do you not think our goal was lucky considering it was straight at the goalkeeper? It was an OK strike, but certainly one that should have been saved
Birmingham went 120 minutes on Tuesday, yet when they played last night, they looked completely fine, so not sure we can use that as an excuse for the laboured performances out there
by leon » 08 Feb 2020 19:09
by sandman » 08 Feb 2020 19:12
by Stranded » 08 Feb 2020 19:28
by Crowbar6753 » 08 Feb 2020 19:32
by URZZZZ » 08 Feb 2020 19:37
Crowbar6753 Why the hell are we playing 5-3-2 at home against a Hull City team who's form is dire!! Away from home, yep i get it, but we should be taking the game to teams like Hull, especially if as Bowen says "We are still going to give the play-offs a go".
Most teams play 4-2-3-1 these days and there's a good reason for this "It works".
Play a back four with Gunter, Moore, Morrison and Richards.
Play Swift and Pele as deep lying midfielders, Pele can cover the back four and Swift has time to dictate the play.
Play Ejaria off the shoulder of the striker and Obita and Meite or Timbe as attacking inside forwards.
Finally either Puscas or Baldock as the lone striker but getting plenty of support from the attacking three just behind him.
And finally we have to play with pace and tempo, today was slow and lethargic and boring as......
by Fox Talbot » 08 Feb 2020 19:37
by URZZZZ » 08 Feb 2020 19:42
NewCorkSeth Not gonna bother with a full report. Big question for me is "Why Aluko?" What does he bring in that scenario? Take off a hard working, industrious striker and replace him with Aluko?
Dont get me wrong Swift and Ejaria do their fair share in helping defensively but neither threaten in the air or are particularly strong in the tackle. A midfield with Swift, Ejaria and Aluko??? I'm surprised they didnt walk through the middle.
I am sure there will be some Aluko apologists responding to this saying "what about his pass in blah blah blah". We dont need a weak, lazy AMC coming on when we are winning. Awful choice, awful player.
by John Madejski's Wallet » 08 Feb 2020 19:52
by Hound » 08 Feb 2020 19:56
Stranded We have an average team playing on cruise control as we sre currently in no danger of relegation or the play-offs. Unless something shifts to change that then we have 15 similar games left this season.
Some we will nick by a goal, some we will lose by the same. The majority will be draws.
by Platypuss » 08 Feb 2020 20:06
Users browsing this forum: Royals and Racers and 185 guests