by 6ft Kerplunk » 23 Mar 2020 16:42
by Sanguine » 23 Mar 2020 17:01
Franchise FCSanguine6ft Kerplunk Some people may still be watching endless repeats of the last couple of decades of the Sky Sports archive just to get their sporting fix.
The channels don't get removed.
Isn't that what 'Still watch the channels ...' means ?
by Sutekh » 28 Mar 2020 20:31
by AthleticoSpizz » 28 Mar 2020 22:08
by Green » 29 Mar 2020 17:50
6ft Kerplunk Soz for skim reading stuff, didn't notice they you can still watch bit. So yeah why haven't they just paused everyone's subscription.
by Sanguine » 30 Mar 2020 17:48
Green6ft Kerplunk Soz for skim reading stuff, didn't notice they you can still watch bit. So yeah why haven't they just paused everyone's subscription.
As anyone who's ever run a subscription business will attest - about half of your revenue comes from people who no longer use you service (and in most of those cases are even aware they still pay for it)
To put another way, it's pretty obvious why sky haven't paused all subs isn't it?
by Green » 17 Apr 2020 20:21
SanguineGreen6ft Kerplunk Soz for skim reading stuff, didn't notice they you can still watch bit. So yeah why haven't they just paused everyone's subscription.
As anyone who's ever run a subscription business will attest - about half of your revenue comes from people who no longer use you service (and in most of those cases are even aware they still pay for it)
To put another way, it's pretty obvious why sky haven't paused all subs isn't it?
I don't think anyone was suggesting that pausing subscriptions was the best decision from a pure bottom line perspective. I think we are in 'right thing to do' territory though.
Users browsing this forum: Dirk Gently and 53 guests