by PistolPete »
24 Jul 2020 21:56
25 is young-ish, sure. FWIW, I'm massively pro signing 27-and-under but mainly because because they have a re-sale value. But the idea that they're 'hungrier' is a myth.
Also, players coming up from lower leagues is a better strategy? Since when? The only advantage is probably the wages.
I mean, if they're proven to be too good for the league below, then of course don't ignore them, but lets not make it a sure fire strategy?!
Our recent signings are listed below, try to pick a pattern amongst that lot!
The problem for fans is that we have a confirmation bias to the way we think; we BELIEVE players who are young and moving up leagues ought to be hungry and will therefore be successful - when they succeed we attribute it to this hunger, but when they' fail, we look for other reasons as to why. On top of our confirmation bias is our love of the Vardy/Ian Wright style zero to hero romance
In truth, for a signing to be successful, the player needs to be a good combination of talented, determined and well managed. Centre backs like Morrison were almost always going to be successful because the centre back role doesn't change much, his ability is proven at this level and his personality was know to be excellent.
I'm old enough to remember one of the few times we bought a player from the league above us who was actually playing, Darren Caskey. He was hungry in a different way, but turned out to be a hell of a signing!
Anyway, the list:
George Puscas
Lucas João
Charlie Adam
Rafael
Michael Morrrison
Pelé
Ovie Ejaria
Felipe Araruna
Matt Miazga
Lucas Boyé
Sone Aluko
Marc McNulty
Modou Barrow
Vito Mannone
Danzell Gravenberch
Adrian Popa
Joey van den Berg
Sam Baldock
David Meyler
Sam Walker
Andy Yiadom
Nélson Oliveiras
Matt Miazga
Lewis Baker
Emiliano Martínez
Saeid Ezatolahi
Andrija Novakovich
Deniss Rakels
Sandro Wieser
Yakou Méïté
I'd say most of the over 30s had something to prove! It really is a nonsense