by Royals and Racers » 03 Sep 2020 12:27
Old Man Andrews Young Chelsea left back.
by Hendo » 03 Sep 2020 12:27
Hendo If he turns out like the last LB we got from Chelsea on loan, then I am all for it.
We do need cover for Richards, as I would expect him to be the starter this year.
Would also like a right back as cover for Yiadom.
by Hendo » 03 Sep 2020 12:36
Old Man AndrewsHendo If he turns out like the last LB we got from Chelsea on loan, then I am all for it.
We do need cover for Richards, as I would expect him to be the starter this year.
Would also like a right back as cover for Yiadom.
Is Osho still without a club? Might be worth upping the contract offer and getting him back in.
HendoOld Man AndrewsHendo If he turns out like the last LB we got from Chelsea on loan, then I am all for it.
We do need cover for Richards, as I would expect him to be the starter this year.
Would also like a right back as cover for Yiadom.
Is Osho still without a club? Might be worth upping the contract offer and getting him back in.
I think so, I'd take him back, 100%.
But I don't think it was about money, it was more about playing time.
If he is still without a club after the season has started, he may think twice about it I guess.
by Nameless » 03 Sep 2020 12:49
Old Man AndrewsHendoOld Man Andrews Is Osho still without a club? Might be worth upping the contract offer and getting him back in.
I think so, I'd take him back, 100%.
But I don't think it was about money, it was more about playing time.
If he is still without a club after the season has started, he may think twice about it I guess.
Think he would get a fair bit of game time this season with the games so thick and fast, Yiadom is a bit on the injury prone side too. A bit of extra cash would be hard to turn down, especially as he is still without a club. No idea if it true but I was told on Twitter that the club offered him the same financial terms as an academy player would get.
NamelessOld Man AndrewsHendo
I think so, I'd take him back, 100%.
But I don't think it was about money, it was more about playing time.
If he is still without a club after the season has started, he may think twice about it I guess.
Think he would get a fair bit of game time this season with the games so thick and fast, Yiadom is a bit on the injury prone side too. A bit of extra cash would be hard to turn down, especially as he is still without a club. No idea if it true but I was told on Twitter that the club offered him the same financial terms as an academy player would get.
Not sure why we would offer him any more money ! If he’s not got a club then we’d be better than being unemployed.
My understanding is we initially offer d him a reduced contract (presumably on the basis he’d not done anything to warrant a pay rise). That may have been a standard , entry level pro deal. We then offered a new deal on the same terms as his current contract. How that compares to what he might get as an inexperienced but promising young pro at a mid level div 2 side I’m not sure.
by Pepe the Horseman » 03 Sep 2020 13:11
by Millsy » 03 Sep 2020 13:47
by NewCorkSeth » 03 Sep 2020 14:03
Pepe the Horseman He's only 5ft 6, so don't think he's a realistic option at CB. Sounds very highly rate at Chelsea though, so hopefully would provide Richards with some decent competition.
by Pepe the Horseman » 03 Sep 2020 14:26
NewCorkSethPepe the Horseman He's only 5ft 6, so don't think he's a realistic option at CB. Sounds very highly rate at Chelsea though, so hopefully would provide Richards with some decent competition.
There are Dutch people below 6ft??
by NewCorkSeth » 03 Sep 2020 14:33
Pepe the HorsemanNewCorkSethPepe the Horseman He's only 5ft 6, so don't think he's a realistic option at CB. Sounds very highly rate at Chelsea though, so hopefully would provide Richards with some decent competition.
There are Dutch people below 6ft??
by Barcelona Blue » 03 Sep 2020 14:42
by royalp-we » 03 Sep 2020 15:01
by Hound » 03 Sep 2020 15:02
by Nameless » 03 Sep 2020 15:15
Old Man AndrewsNamelessOld Man Andrews Think he would get a fair bit of game time this season with the games so thick and fast, Yiadom is a bit on the injury prone side too. A bit of extra cash would be hard to turn down, especially as he is still without a club. No idea if it true but I was told on Twitter that the club offered him the same financial terms as an academy player would get.
Not sure why we would offer him any more money ! If he’s not got a club then we’d be better than being unemployed.
My understanding is we initially offer d him a reduced contract (presumably on the basis he’d not done anything to warrant a pay rise). That may have been a standard , entry level pro deal. We then offered a new deal on the same terms as his current contract. How that compares to what he might get as an inexperienced but promising young pro at a mid level div 2 side I’m not sure.
He is perfectly capable of playing in the Championship and provides CB cover too. He did plenty to show his worth and earn an a much improved deal.
by Westwood52 » 03 Sep 2020 17:21
HendoOld Man AndrewsHendo If he turns out like the last LB we got from Chelsea on loan, then I am all for it.
We do need cover for Richards, as I would expect him to be the starter this year.
Would also like a right back as cover for Yiadom.
Is Osho still without a club? Might be worth upping the contract offer and getting him back in.
I think so, I'd take him back, 100%.
But I don't think it was about money, it was more about playing time.
If he is still without a club after the season has started, he may think twice about it I guess.
Westwood52HendoOld Man Andrews Is Osho still without a club? Might be worth upping the contract offer and getting him back in.
I think so, I'd take him back, 100%.
But I don't think it was about money, it was more about playing time.
If he is still without a club after the season has started, he may think twice about it I guess.
No it was the money.The offer was not enough to pay the mortgage.This may however be the new reality.
by Nameless » 03 Sep 2020 17:48
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 47 guests