by Sanguine » 10 Sep 2020 09:01
Sanguine Every PL game in September to be available live, with the suspension of the 3pm blackout extended with fans still locked out of games.
https://www.sportinglife.com/football/n ... -tv/184085
by Simmops » 10 Sep 2020 11:10
Old Man AndrewsSanguine Every PL game in September to be available live, with the suspension of the 3pm blackout extended with fans still locked out of games.
https://www.sportinglife.com/football/n ... -tv/184085
Good move. I'd like all the clubs to offer their supporters a heavily discounted subscription to the iFollow service seeing as there is next to no chance we will see supporters back in stadiums this side of Christmas. £10 a game is very steep.
by Pepe the Horseman » 10 Sep 2020 12:25
SimmopsOld Man AndrewsSanguine Every PL game in September to be available live, with the suspension of the 3pm blackout extended with fans still locked out of games.
https://www.sportinglife.com/football/n ... -tv/184085
Good move. I'd like all the clubs to offer their supporters a heavily discounted subscription to the iFollow service seeing as there is next to no chance we will see supporters back in stadiums this side of Christmas. £10 a game is very steep.
I do not think a tenner per game is that bad. When you go to games you normally buy a pie, programme and booze, which always add ups.
by Simmops » 10 Sep 2020 12:44
Pepe the HorsemanSimmopsOld Man Andrews Good move. I'd like all the clubs to offer their supporters a heavily discounted subscription to the iFollow service seeing as there is next to no chance we will see supporters back in stadiums this side of Christmas. £10 a game is very steep.
I do not think a tenner per game is that bad. When you go to games you normally buy a pie, programme and booze, which always add ups.
It'll cost £220 to watch all the league games just until the end of December.
by Pepe the Horseman » 10 Sep 2020 12:47
SimmopsPepe the HorsemanSimmops
I do not think a tenner per game is that bad. When you go to games you normally buy a pie, programme and booze, which always add ups.
It'll cost £220 to watch all the league games just until the end of December.
But you do not have to watch them all and it is still cheaper then going to a game IRL
by Snowflake Royal » 10 Sep 2020 17:34
Pepe the HorsemanSimmopsOld Man Andrews Good move. I'd like all the clubs to offer their supporters a heavily discounted subscription to the iFollow service seeing as there is next to no chance we will see supporters back in stadiums this side of Christmas. £10 a game is very steep.
I do not think a tenner per game is that bad. When you go to games you normally buy a pie, programme and booze, which always add ups.
It'll cost £220 to watch all the league games just until the end of December.
by Simmops » 10 Sep 2020 17:50
Snowflake RoyalPepe the HorsemanSimmops
I do not think a tenner per game is that bad. When you go to games you normally buy a pie, programme and booze, which always add ups.
It'll cost £220 to watch all the league games just until the end of December.
It'd cost about £450 in tickets to see them live though.
It's really easy to cast stuff to a tv or hook a pc/ laptop up to one.
The experience argument you have to ask yourself what you're going for... is it to watch a football match or get pissed with the lads. If it's the former about half price seems fair, if it's the latter, why would you buy it no matter the price?
by URZZZZ » 11 Sep 2020 16:38
Snowflake RoyalPepe the HorsemanSimmops
I do not think a tenner per game is that bad. When you go to games you normally buy a pie, programme and booze, which always add ups.
It'll cost £220 to watch all the league games just until the end of December.
It'd cost about £450 in tickets to see them live though.
It's really easy to cast stuff to a tv or hook a pc/ laptop up to one.
The experience argument you have to ask yourself what you're going for... is it to watch a football match or get pissed with the lads. If it's the former about half price seems fair, if it's the latter, why would you buy it no matter the price?
by BR0B0T » 12 Sep 2020 17:37
by SouthDownsRoyal » 12 Sep 2020 22:08
by SouthDownsRoyal » 12 Sep 2020 22:08
BR0B0T lol...switched off already!
by BR0B0T » 12 Sep 2020 23:09
SouthDownsRoyalBR0B0T lol...switched off already!
by Sanguine » 14 Sep 2020 09:19
by URZZZZ » 14 Sep 2020 10:48
Sanguine A few years back, Liverpool would have found a way to lose that game. A bit like Villa away last season - under Klopp, Liverpool just find a way. As great as it was to see Leeds play their normal game, the scoreline flattered them a bit - 22 hosts to 6, 9 corners to 0. Many other days that's a 4-0 or 4-1, and Bielsa was realistic afterwards.
by South Coast Royal » 14 Sep 2020 11:42
URZZZZSanguine A few years back, Liverpool would have found a way to lose that game. A bit like Villa away last season - under Klopp, Liverpool just find a way. As great as it was to see Leeds play their normal game, the scoreline flattered them a bit - 22 hosts to 6, 9 corners to 0. Many other days that's a 4-0 or 4-1, and Bielsa was realistic afterwards.
I thought Leeds played bravely and put up a good battle but I agree the scoreline flattered them
Although the Leeds/Bielsa love in affair is growing tiresome already. Thought Leeds played similarly to Norwich this time last year at Anfield, albeit more clinical but the reaction to those two teams were vastly different
by URZZZZ » 14 Sep 2020 11:44
South Coast RoyalURZZZZSanguine A few years back, Liverpool would have found a way to lose that game. A bit like Villa away last season - under Klopp, Liverpool just find a way. As great as it was to see Leeds play their normal game, the scoreline flattered them a bit - 22 hosts to 6, 9 corners to 0. Many other days that's a 4-0 or 4-1, and Bielsa was realistic afterwards.
I thought Leeds played bravely and put up a good battle but I agree the scoreline flattered them
Although the Leeds/Bielsa love in affair is growing tiresome already. Thought Leeds played similarly to Norwich this time last year at Anfield, albeit more clinical but the reaction to those two teams were vastly different
Leeds looked good enough to stay up whereas West Brom and Fulham look like what they probably will be in a year's time, Championship clubs.
Both of these teams are still playing with Championship level defenders who are clearly not good enough.
by South Coast Royal » 14 Sep 2020 11:46
URZZZZSouth Coast RoyalURZZZZ
I thought Leeds played bravely and put up a good battle but I agree the scoreline flattered them
Although the Leeds/Bielsa love in affair is growing tiresome already. Thought Leeds played similarly to Norwich this time last year at Anfield, albeit more clinical but the reaction to those two teams were vastly different
Leeds looked good enough to stay up whereas West Brom and Fulham look like what they probably will be in a year's time, Championship clubs.
Both of these teams are still playing with Championship level defenders who are clearly not good enough.
I think Robson Kanu being West Brom’s 1st/2nd choice striker is also a big issue, WBA in dire need of a striker
by Sanguine » 14 Sep 2020 11:46
South Coast RoyalURZZZZSanguine A few years back, Liverpool would have found a way to lose that game. A bit like Villa away last season - under Klopp, Liverpool just find a way. As great as it was to see Leeds play their normal game, the scoreline flattered them a bit - 22 hosts to 6, 9 corners to 0. Many other days that's a 4-0 or 4-1, and Bielsa was realistic afterwards.
I thought Leeds played bravely and put up a good battle but I agree the scoreline flattered them
Although the Leeds/Bielsa love in affair is growing tiresome already. Thought Leeds played similarly to Norwich this time last year at Anfield, albeit more clinical but the reaction to those two teams were vastly different
Leeds looked good enough to stay up whereas West Brom and Fulham look like what they probably will be in a year's time, Championship clubs.
Both of these teams are still playing with Championship level defenders who are clearly not good enough.
by South Coast Royal » 14 Sep 2020 11:49
SanguineSouth Coast RoyalURZZZZ
I thought Leeds played bravely and put up a good battle but I agree the scoreline flattered them
Although the Leeds/Bielsa love in affair is growing tiresome already. Thought Leeds played similarly to Norwich this time last year at Anfield, albeit more clinical but the reaction to those two teams were vastly different
Leeds looked good enough to stay up whereas West Brom and Fulham look like what they probably will be in a year's time, Championship clubs.
Both of these teams are still playing with Championship level defenders who are clearly not good enough.
Fulham have signed two defenders and a keeper in the last week, so I'd expect some changes soon enough. Ironically it was a poor performance from keeper Rodak that really summed up Fulham in their defeat, after fans had been up in arms at Areaola's signing, as Rodak was brilliant in the Championship.
Users browsing this forum: BRO_BOT and 46 guests