ZipCountryRoyalOld Man Andrews Disagree with either Bristol City foul being a red card. First one was two footed but not a lunge or the player being out of control. He knew he'd made an error going with 2 feet and slowed down imo.
Chris Martin's was just a bad foul from an awful, lazy striker. Both justified yellows for me.
The first could have gone either way but I think letter of the law he’s gone. VAR and he’s off imho.
Second one is a clear red if the ref sees. It’s cynical and he’s stamped on the back of us ankle with his studs. It was violent and no attempt at the ball.
Yep agreed.
Also agreed. On another day both could’ve been reds and they would’ve been totally justified. That Martin one could’ve easily given Moore a major injury. He makes zero attempt to play the ball, was totally petulant and the definition of endangering an opponent.
The first one I think could go either way, Laurent getting out of the way certainly helped their guys cause. Any contact at all and it’s a straight red.
Ref was pretty piss poor all round, tbh.