by Norfolk Royal » 14 Apr 2021 09:40
by andrew1957 » 14 Apr 2021 09:53
by WestYorksRoyal » 14 Apr 2021 09:56
by Elm Park Kid » 14 Apr 2021 10:28
by WestYorksRoyal » 14 Apr 2021 10:38
Elm Park Kid The Championship is a truly bonkers league, our spending isn't even particularly high for a club going for promotion - I think our average salary is probably still outside the top 6 this season.
It puts things into perspective. The only way of getting promoted is to 1. Constantly spend high amounts of money and find a way to 'balance the books' before getting promoted; or 2. Sheer luck through getting the right combination of managers/cheap players for a season or two.
£226m losses is crazy though given our poor record overall. Maybe our policy of hiring a new, untested manager every season needs a rethink.
by tidus_mi2 » 14 Apr 2021 10:50
by Millsy » 14 Apr 2021 11:46
tidus_mi2 It doesn't look pretty but I have faith the club are heading the right direction with the finances, they could certainly prove that by selling Olise in the Summer if a big bid comes in especially considering he is basically in a similar situation to Loader when we rejected that Wolves bid, albeit being a more sought after property and more money involved.
But seriously, as with every post about our financial situation they should always end with: oxf*rd Ron Gourlay.
by linkenholtroyal » 14 Apr 2021 12:00
Millsytidus_mi2 It doesn't look pretty but I have faith the club are heading the right direction with the finances, they could certainly prove that by selling Olise in the Summer if a big bid comes in especially considering he is basically in a similar situation to Loader when we rejected that Wolves bid, albeit being a more sought after property and more money involved.
But seriously, as with every post about our financial situation they should always end with: oxf*rd Ron Gourlay.
Doesn't he have a min release clause of £8mill though? (source: HNA)
by Snowflake Royal » 14 Apr 2021 12:25
by Snowflake Royal » 14 Apr 2021 12:27
Millsytidus_mi2 It doesn't look pretty but I have faith the club are heading the right direction with the finances, they could certainly prove that by selling Olise in the Summer if a big bid comes in especially considering he is basically in a similar situation to Loader when we rejected that Wolves bid, albeit being a more sought after property and more money involved.
But seriously, as with every post about our financial situation they should always end with: oxf*rd Ron Gourlay.
Doesn't he have a min release clause of £8mill though? (source: HNA)
by From Despair To Where? » 14 Apr 2021 12:36
Snowflake RoyalMillsytidus_mi2 It doesn't look pretty but I have faith the club are heading the right direction with the finances, they could certainly prove that by selling Olise in the Summer if a big bid comes in especially considering he is basically in a similar situation to Loader when we rejected that Wolves bid, albeit being a more sought after property and more money involved.
But seriously, as with every post about our financial situation they should always end with: oxf*rd Ron Gourlay.
Doesn't he have a min release clause of £8mill though? (source: HNA)
If he did he'd be long gone.
by Hendo » 14 Apr 2021 12:37
From Despair To Where?Snowflake RoyalMillsy
Doesn't he have a min release clause of £8mill though? (source: HNA)
If he did he'd be long gone.
Shouldn't that read (source: some thick, over exciteable twat at The Yorkshire Post that plays too much Football Manager)?
by Nameless » 14 Apr 2021 12:50
by Snowflake Royal » 14 Apr 2021 12:56
by tidus_mi2 » 14 Apr 2021 12:59
Snowflake Royal The thing that's important to remember, is that none of this should be a surprise to the club or authorities.
And a club who sack their CEO and cooperated with soft embargos should not be punished for the effects of the sacked CEO's tenure 2 years after he was sacked.
There's very little we could have done differently. Sold a couple of players, not signed a couple. That's literally it. In two years.
One thing I think is apparent though. We should do absolutely everything, including accepting bids of £0, to move Moore off the wages. He's the last of the crazy deals, and arguably the craziest.
by WestYorksRoyal » 14 Apr 2021 13:15
tidus_mi2Snowflake Royal The thing that's important to remember, is that none of this should be a surprise to the club or authorities.
And a club who sack their CEO and cooperated with soft embargos should not be punished for the effects of the sacked CEO's tenure 2 years after he was sacked.
There's very little we could have done differently. Sold a couple of players, not signed a couple. That's literally it. In two years.
FFP is likely to bite the dust soon or be reworked I would imagine, UEFA have acted first, I'd imagine the EPL will follow and the EFL would probably drag it's heels but eventually join in.One thing I think is apparent though. We should do absolutely everything, including accepting bids of £0, to move Moore off the wages. He's the last of the crazy deals, and arguably the craziest.
Yep, love Moore, love his attitude and I think he's a great captain but unless he agrees a significant wage drop, the club should look to sell if they get an offer really.
by Linden Jones' Tash » 14 Apr 2021 13:21
Snowflake Royal One thing I think is apparent though. We should do absolutely everything, including accepting bids of £0, to move Moore off the wages. He's the last of the crazy deals, and arguably the craziest.
by genome » 14 Apr 2021 13:34
Linden Jones' TashSnowflake Royal One thing I think is apparent though. We should do absolutely everything, including accepting bids of £0, to move Moore off the wages. He's the last of the crazy deals, and arguably the craziest.
What is his deal?
by Linden Jones' Tash » 14 Apr 2021 14:06
Users browsing this forum: biff, Bing [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 191 guests