by Millsy » 15 Apr 2021 11:46
by Getthebeerens » 15 Apr 2021 12:32
by tidus_mi2 » 15 Apr 2021 12:39
Getthebeerens What is the actual punishment for breaking FFP ?
From the soft transfer embargo we have had, it sounds like we have at least been working with the EFL to improve our situation.
FFP clearly not fit for purpose we no longer own our stadium and training ground. I can’t believe that in this COVID world things have not been put in place to control spending in football overall.
I suppose moving forward it’s about getting this wage bill under control and bringing through academy players and selling them. As well as some smart recruitment from lower leagues and abroad. I wonder if that’s why we went down the Pauno route for manger now.
by Elm Park Kid » 15 Apr 2021 13:13
by Snowflake Royal » 15 Apr 2021 13:16
Elm Park Kid This is why both the government and PL were so reluctant to give any money in terms of covid bailout to the Championship. Teams continued to spend, spend, spend, regardless of their income.
by tidus_mi2 » 15 Apr 2021 14:10
by From Despair To Where? » 15 Apr 2021 14:47
by Greatwesternline » 15 Apr 2021 15:54
by Maneki Neko » 15 Apr 2021 16:16
Getthebeerens What is the actual punishment for breaking FFP ?
From the soft transfer embargo we have had, it sounds like we have at least been working with the EFL to improve our situation.
FFP clearly not fit for purpose we no longer own our stadium and training ground. I can’t believe that in this COVID world things have not been put in place to control spending in football overall.
I suppose moving forward it’s about getting this wage bill under control and bringing through academy players and selling them. As well as some smart recruitment from lower leagues and abroad. I wonder if that’s why we went down the Pauno route for manger now.
by CountryRoyal » 15 Apr 2021 17:05
Snowflake Royal The thing that's important to remember, is that none of this should be a surprise to the club or authorities.
And a club who sack their CEO and cooperated with soft embargos should not be punished for the effects of the sacked CEO's tenure 2 years after he was sacked.
There's very little we could have done differently. Sold a couple of players, not signed a couple. That's literally it. In two years. Once the damage was done under Gourlay.
One thing I think is apparent though. We should do absolutely everything, including accepting bids of £0, to move Moore off the wages. He's the last of the crazy deals, and arguably the craziest.
by CountryRoyal » 15 Apr 2021 17:10
Greatwesternline i remember when we played Rotherham, and their fans were like, oh look they are bringing a loanee from Porto off the bench.
That isnt a great look for a club claiming poverty.
by Getthebeerens » 15 Apr 2021 18:04
Maneki NekoGetthebeerens What is the actual punishment for breaking FFP ?
From the soft transfer embargo we have had, it sounds like we have at least been working with the EFL to improve our situation.
FFP clearly not fit for purpose we no longer own our stadium and training ground. I can’t believe that in this COVID world things have not been put in place to control spending in football overall.
I suppose moving forward it’s about getting this wage bill under control and bringing through academy players and selling them. As well as some smart recruitment from lower leagues and abroad. I wonder if that’s why we went down the Pauno route for manger now.
we must have one of the best records at this level for that as it is
by Zip » 15 Apr 2021 18:23
Maneki NekoZipSnowflake Royal If we're genuinely in trouble the FL need to take a long hard look at themselves.
We were in a soft transfer embargo two summers ago and came out of it with permission to sign Puscas and Joao for big money.
They allowed us to turn down big money offers for Swift and Loader.
We were in a soft embargo last summer and only really signed Laurent for this season.
We've also moved on McCleary and Gunter. And Baldock and Aluko go at the end of this season. Plus lots more TV money in.
The wages are an absolute disgrace, but they have to have come down this season and again next.
The lack of signings and whole approach has given no signs of desperation for promotion or bust, maybe Bowen's sacking, but replacing him with an unknown with no local experience is hardly promotion or bust.
We now know that our transfer embargo just announced was at least partly down to the filing of accounts, as they've just been published, and could therefore just be the same sort of Admin thing as other clubs.
Not concerned at this point.
Yep. There was something not quite right when we went from being in a soft embargo signing freebies to suddenly paying big money for Joao and Puscas two years ago. The FL sanctioned all of this so I fail to see how they can now hit us hard with a points deduction. Having said that our losses are so bad that we must be in breach of FFP so a points deduction wouldn’t surprise me.
hard to disentangle what is terrible financial management and what is as a result of playing a season and a half without crowds.
surely every club will be financially oxf*rd due to covid and it seems a bit daft to carry on as normal with FFP
by Zip » 15 Apr 2021 18:34
VisionZipSnowflake Royal If we're genuinely in trouble the FL need to take a long hard look at themselves.
We were in a soft transfer embargo two summers ago and came out of it with permission to sign Puscas and Joao for big money.
They allowed us to turn down big money offers for Swift and Loader.
We were in a soft embargo last summer and only really signed Laurent for this season.
We've also moved on McCleary and Gunter. And Baldock and Aluko go at the end of this season. Plus lots more TV money in.
The wages are an absolute disgrace, but they have to have come down this season and again next.
The lack of signings and whole approach has given no signs of desperation for promotion or bust, maybe Bowen's sacking, but replacing him with an unknown with no local experience is hardly promotion or bust.
We now know that our transfer embargo just announced was at least partly down to the filing of accounts, as they've just been published, and could therefore just be the same sort of Admin thing as other clubs.
Not concerned at this point.
Yep. There was something not quite right when we went from being in a soft embargo signing freebies to suddenly paying big money for Joao and Puscas two years ago. The FL sanctioned all of this so I fail to see how they can now hit us hard with a points deduction. Having said that our losses are so bad that we must be in breach of FFP so a points deduction wouldn’t surprise me.
That was the Stadium deal wasn't it?
I'm not sure it's for the EFL to mollycoddle us once we've convinced them we've got this new hefty revenue stream.
The fact we then went out and got Joao, Puscas, Rafael, Boye, Miazga, Ejaria etc with that money rather than use it to help with FFP (assuming it counts towards FFP) was entirely our decision. That's absolutely how it should be of course but we can't then blame anyone else if that gamble fails.
Of course as Elm Park Kid rightly points out , it would have been a gamble of a different kind to have continued that season with the squad we started it with. We threw the dice and there's still a small possibility it may work (RTGs fully on ) but if doesn't then as a club we have to accept what comes with that failure.
by Snowflake Royal » 15 Apr 2021 18:34
GetthebeerensManeki NekoGetthebeerens What is the actual punishment for breaking FFP ?
From the soft transfer embargo we have had, it sounds like we have at least been working with the EFL to improve our situation.
FFP clearly not fit for purpose we no longer own our stadium and training ground. I can’t believe that in this COVID world things have not been put in place to control spending in football overall.
I suppose moving forward it’s about getting this wage bill under control and bringing through academy players and selling them. As well as some smart recruitment from lower leagues and abroad. I wonder if that’s why we went down the Pauno route for manger now.
we must have one of the best records at this level for that as it is
Good at the bringing them through part but not so good at the selling them part. I hope our owners cash in on Olise before he runs his contract down. Can’t afford to keep having the likes of Richards and Loader leave for nothing. I read somewhere we are one of the worst clubs in terms of generating revenue through player sales in the Championship.
by From Despair To Where? » 15 Apr 2021 19:12
CountryRoyalGreatwesternline i remember when we played Rotherham, and their fans were like, oh look they are bringing a loanee from Porto off the bench.
That isnt a great look for a club claiming poverty.
That sounds exotic but without knowledge of the deal is an almost entirely pointless statement.
For a start the average salary of the Portuguese league is considerably lower than the championship, and that’s not even considering an 18 year old. Porto or not.
Plus who know, they might be paying some of his wages, either way I doubt he’s costing us a lot (of money, points is a different story )
by The Royal Forester » 15 Apr 2021 19:37
ZipVisionZip
Yep. There was something not quite right when we went from being in a soft embargo signing freebies to suddenly paying big money for Joao and Puscas two years ago. The FL sanctioned all of this so I fail to see how they can now hit us hard with a points deduction. Having said that our losses are so bad that we must be in breach of FFP so a points deduction wouldn’t surprise me.
That was the Stadium deal wasn't it?
I'm not sure it's for the EFL to mollycoddle us once we've convinced them we've got this new hefty revenue stream.
The fact we then went out and got Joao, Puscas, Rafael, Boye, Miazga, Ejaria etc with that money rather than use it to help with FFP (assuming it counts towards FFP) was entirely our decision. That's absolutely how it should be of course but we can't then blame anyone else if that gamble fails.
Of course as Elm Park Kid rightly points out , it would have been a gamble of a different kind to have continued that season with the squad we started it with. We threw the dice and there's still a small possibility it may work (RTGs fully on ) but if doesn't then as a club we have to accept what comes with that failure.
You may be right. I suppose buying those players boosted a poor and struggling squad. We may have gone down otherwise. Difficult to see how we can escape a points deduction next season.
If we do go up why would a points deduction not be applied? I have never understood this aspect. Surely if we are guilty the points deduction would apply irrespective of whether we were a PL club.
by Zip » 15 Apr 2021 19:41
The Royal ForesterZipVision
That was the Stadium deal wasn't it?
I'm not sure it's for the EFL to mollycoddle us once we've convinced them we've got this new hefty revenue stream.
The fact we then went out and got Joao, Puscas, Rafael, Boye, Miazga, Ejaria etc with that money rather than use it to help with FFP (assuming it counts towards FFP) was entirely our decision. That's absolutely how it should be of course but we can't then blame anyone else if that gamble fails.
Of course as Elm Park Kid rightly points out , it would have been a gamble of a different kind to have continued that season with the squad we started it with. We threw the dice and there's still a small possibility it may work (RTGs fully on ) but if doesn't then as a club we have to accept what comes with that failure.
You may be right. I suppose buying those players boosted a poor and struggling squad. We may have gone down otherwise. Difficult to see how we can escape a points deduction next season.
If we do go up why would a points deduction not be applied? I have never understood this aspect. Surely if we are guilty the points deduction would apply irrespective of whether we were a PL club.
The deduction will not be applied because the Premier League and the English Football League are run by two different authorities. Although both come under the FA, when the PL broke away from the Football League, they made their own rules. The breakaway was, of course, instigated by the "bigger and richer" clubs to make more money from TV rights etc.
by Nameless » 15 Apr 2021 20:17
by The Royal Forester » 15 Apr 2021 21:23
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 207 guests