by WestYorksRoyal » 17 Nov 2021 18:44
by Stranded » 17 Nov 2021 18:46
WestYorksRoyal Lots of ITK people posting details about our business plan, and it looks pretty strict. But, surely it gives us freedom at the same time? We can offer the likes of Halilovic, Hoilett etc. extensions if we see fit, given that we know our limits. We were always going to lose Swift, but I wonder if retaining Laurent is out of reach too.
by The Royal Forester » 17 Nov 2021 18:46
by windermereROYAL » 17 Nov 2021 18:48
StrandedWestYorksRoyal Lots of ITK people posting details about our business plan, and it looks pretty strict. But, surely it gives us freedom at the same time? We can offer the likes of Halilovic, Hoilett etc. extensions if we see fit, given that we know our limits. We were always going to lose Swift, but I wonder if retaining Laurent is out of reach too.
In short it does give us freedom in some ways. When Swift goes that is what 20k pw off the bill, if we can move Moore on next summer then another 30k goes.
Replace both with decent free agents at 10k pw and we've already saved 2m of the 5m on the budget just from 2 players.
by Zip » 17 Nov 2021 18:52
StrandedWestYorksRoyal Lots of ITK people posting details about our business plan, and it looks pretty strict. But, surely it gives us freedom at the same time? We can offer the likes of Halilovic, Hoilett etc. extensions if we see fit, given that we know our limits. We were always going to lose Swift, but I wonder if retaining Laurent is out of reach too.
In short it does give us freedom in some ways. When Swift goes that is what 20k pw off the bill, if we can move Moore on next summer then another 30k goes.
Replace both with decent free agents at 10k pw and we've already saved 2m of the 5m on the budget just from 2 players.
by Zip » 17 Nov 2021 18:53
windermereROYALStrandedWestYorksRoyal Lots of ITK people posting details about our business plan, and it looks pretty strict. But, surely it gives us freedom at the same time? We can offer the likes of Halilovic, Hoilett etc. extensions if we see fit, given that we know our limits. We were always going to lose Swift, but I wonder if retaining Laurent is out of reach too.
In short it does give us freedom in some ways. When Swift goes that is what 20k pw off the bill, if we can move Moore on next summer then another 30k goes.
Replace both with decent free agents at 10k pw and we've already saved 2m of the 5m on the budget just from 2 players.
How do we move Moore on?
by Zip » 17 Nov 2021 18:55
by Crowbar6753 » 17 Nov 2021 18:56
StrandedWestYorksRoyal Lots of ITK people posting details about our business plan, and it looks pretty strict. But, surely it gives us freedom at the same time? We can offer the likes of Halilovic, Hoilett etc. extensions if we see fit, given that we know our limits. We were always going to lose Swift, but I wonder if retaining Laurent is out of reach too.
In short it does give us freedom in some ways. When Swift goes that is what 20k pw off the bill, if we can move Moore on next summer then another 30k goes.
Replace both with decent free agents at 10k pw and we've already saved 2m of the 5m on the budget just from 2 players.
by Mr Optimist » 17 Nov 2021 18:57
ZipwindermereROYALStranded
In short it does give us freedom in some ways. When Swift goes that is what 20k pw off the bill, if we can move Moore on next summer then another 30k goes.
Replace both with decent free agents at 10k pw and we've already saved 2m of the 5m on the budget just from 2 players.
How do we move Moore on?
Quite possible in the summer. Accept a nominal fee with the buyer taking on the final year of his contract. I think that’s a possibility.
by WestYorksRoyal » 17 Nov 2021 19:02
Mr OptimistZipwindermereROYAL
How do we move Moore on?
Quite possible in the summer. Accept a nominal fee with the buyer taking on the final year of his contract. I think that’s a possibility.
I think that is quite likely if he has a half decent second half to this season, someone like West Brom may take him on as a squad player
by Crowbar6753 » 17 Nov 2021 19:10
by Tails » 17 Nov 2021 19:43
by morganb » 17 Nov 2021 19:48
by Millsy » 17 Nov 2021 20:01
Zip What this also means is that noone will want to Join us
by TheLawnMowerMan » 17 Nov 2021 20:06
MillsyZip What this also means is that noone will want to Join us
Corrected for you.
by Nameless » 17 Nov 2021 20:07
Zip What this also means is that any players interested in joining Reading will do so knowing they won’t be signing on for big wages. That puts us in a stronger bargaining position.
by Zip » 17 Nov 2021 20:09
NamelessZip What this also means is that any players interested in joining Reading will do so knowing they won’t be signing on for big wages. That puts us in a stronger bargaining position.
How so ?
Surely it means playerswill just go to the clubs that will pay more than we can ?
However I think if you are smart you can recruit well without paying stupid money. Need to find players on the way up, rather than those on the way down.
We also have plenty of good youngsters who will have gained a lot by being around the first team this season. None will be on big wages but they will be in a good position to be proper first team options next year.
by Zip » 17 Nov 2021 20:10
morganb Can't see it posted so here's the link to the EFL page where you can find details of the business plan etc.
https://www.efl.com/-more/governance/ju ... -decisions
So, which players that will still be under contract next season count towards the 25 with 3+ starts?
by windermereROYAL » 17 Nov 2021 20:13
by morganb » 17 Nov 2021 20:19
Zipmorganb Can't see it posted so here's the link to the EFL page where you can find details of the business plan etc.
https://www.efl.com/-more/governance/ju ... -decisions
So, which players that will still be under contract next season count towards the 25 with 3+ starts?
Luke Southwood
Liam Moore
George Puscas
Ovie Ejaria
Lucas Joao
Yakou Meite
Tom McIntyre.
Users browsing this forum: Clyde1998, Lower West, WestYorksRoyal and 253 guests