Rival Watch

17584 posts
User avatar
Zip
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 22408
Joined: 30 Dec 2017 16:39

Re: Rival Watch

by Zip » 04 Feb 2022 14:20

bcubed This doesn’t help -

The Government has urged for “pragmatism from all parties” in the on-going battle to save Derby County and, once again, acknowledged the need for an independent regulator to prevent such collapses happening in future.

The statement by Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay, on behalf of the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, followed a written question by Derby County supporter Lord Pendry.

The Government responded: "The Government has urged pragmatism from all parties to find a solution for the benefit of fans, staff, and the community that the club serves.

"The EFL must preserve the integrity of the league on behalf of all member clubs, but all parties want to see one of the founding members of the Football League continue this season and beyond under appropriate ownership."



They will survive and get away with a lot.

YorkshireRoyal99
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5005
Joined: 10 Aug 2017 18:07

Re: Rival Watch

by YorkshireRoyal99 » 04 Feb 2022 14:25

SpaghettiHoop
YorkshireRoyal99
Franchise FC Why would we have a case ?
They’ve had their penalty applied. What else can we claim ?


If they don't pay back what is credited to them as well as fielding players they have overdue payments for (Bielik from Arsenal for example), our claim would be they've essentially cheated their way through the season and stayed up at our expense. Therefore we'd be claiming for lost revenue, similar to Wycombe.


Surely if there are amounts overdue for transfers, the player involved should not be able to play until the amount is paid.


Well you'd think so but he's still contracted to Derby and they are (presumably still) paying his wages. But again, as you say, how can you field a player you haven't paid for on time to the selling club.

User avatar
Pepe the Horseman
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 18320
Joined: 23 Jun 2011 10:24
Location: Putting right what once went wrong

Re: Rival Watch

by Pepe the Horseman » 04 Feb 2022 14:50

Hound I do think the Bielik case is an interesting one. I reckon Arsenal if they so wanted could probably prevent him playing. But its probably not really in their interest

did stick in the throat a bit when the media love in was in full effect after he got them the point the other day - a player by all rights isn't theirs and who was the very epitome of their overspending

Yep. Love him or hate him, Adrian Durham called it out. Obviously resulting in a load of abuse from Derby fans.

Hound
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 25275
Joined: 27 Sep 2016 22:16
Location: Simpleton

Re: Rival Watch

by Hound » 04 Feb 2022 15:46

Pepe the Horseman
Hound I do think the Bielik case is an interesting one. I reckon Arsenal if they so wanted could probably prevent him playing. But its probably not really in their interest

did stick in the throat a bit when the media love in was in full effect after he got them the point the other day - a player by all rights isn't theirs and who was the very epitome of their overspending

Yep. Love him or hate him, Adrian Durham called it out. Obviously resulting in a load of abuse from Derby fans.


urgh did I accidentally say something that agreed with Durham? I'll take it back :wink:

User avatar
Zip
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 22408
Joined: 30 Dec 2017 16:39

Re: Rival Watch

by Zip » 04 Feb 2022 17:19

Hound
Pepe the Horseman
Hound I do think the Bielik case is an interesting one. I reckon Arsenal if they so wanted could probably prevent him playing. But its probably not really in their interest

did stick in the throat a bit when the media love in was in full effect after he got them the point the other day - a player by all rights isn't theirs and who was the very epitome of their overspending

Yep. Love him or hate him, Adrian Durham called it out. Obviously resulting in a load of abuse from Derby fans.


urgh did I accidentally say something that agreed with Durham? I'll take it back :wink:


He supports Posh so has an interest in all of this. He is correct about Derby but he is pretty awful otherwise,


Mr Angry
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5973
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 16:05
Location: South Oxfordshire

Re: Rival Watch

by Mr Angry » 04 Feb 2022 19:25

YorkshireRoyal99
SpaghettiHoop
YorkshireRoyal99
If they don't pay back what is credited to them as well as fielding players they have overdue payments for (Bielik from Arsenal for example), our claim would be they've essentially cheated their way through the season and stayed up at our expense. Therefore we'd be claiming for lost revenue, similar to Wycombe.


Surely if there are amounts overdue for transfers, the player involved should not be able to play until the amount is paid.


Well you'd think so but he's still contracted to Derby and they are (presumably still) paying his wages. But again, as you say, how can you field a player you haven't paid for on time to the selling club.


This sentence from the EFL quote earlier is interesting:

"..........Members agreed ‘that the starting point is that no Club should gain (or seek to gain) any advantage within the context of professional football over other Clubs by not paying all its creditors in full at all times.’


That is PRECISELY what Derby have done by playing a player (Bielik) who they haven't paid the creditor for in full, and who saved them a point at Forest the other night.

If Derby were to survive, they would be looking at another legal process from the teams that went down on that basis.

User avatar
LUX
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 13407
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:38
Location: Keep this frequency clear

Re: Rival Watch

by LUX » 04 Feb 2022 19:46

Mr Angry
That is PRECISELY what Derby have done by playing a player (Bielik) who they haven't paid the creditor for in full, and who saved them a point at Forest the other night.



Er, no.. Fake news.

User avatar
Zip
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 22408
Joined: 30 Dec 2017 16:39

Re: Rival Watch

by Zip » 04 Feb 2022 19:49

Mr Angry
YorkshireRoyal99
SpaghettiHoop
Surely if there are amounts overdue for transfers, the player involved should not be able to play until the amount is paid.


Well you'd think so but he's still contracted to Derby and they are (presumably still) paying his wages. But again, as you say, how can you field a player you haven't paid for on time to the selling club.


This sentence from the EFL quote earlier is interesting:

"..........Members agreed ‘that the starting point is that no Club should gain (or seek to gain) any advantage within the context of professional football over other Clubs by not paying all its creditors in full at all times.’


That is PRECISELY what Derby have done by playing a player (Bielik) who they haven't paid the creditor for in full, and who saved them a point at Forest the other night.

If Derby were to survive, they would be looking at another legal process from the teams that went down on that basis.



Yep. It is pissing me off that all we are hearing is poor Derby this poor Derby that. They should not be allowed to get away with it particularly as they only sold one regular member of their first team squad in January and could not renew Jagielka’s deal. I’m not including Plange as he was loaned back to them.

If things were that bad and then accept you have to sell your best players and take the hit on relegation. They want to stay up and cheat the creditors.
Last edited by Zip on 04 Feb 2022 20:08, edited 1 time in total.

South Coast Royal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6509
Joined: 16 Jan 2020 17:29

Re: Rival Watch

by South Coast Royal » 04 Feb 2022 19:54

Zip
Hound
Pepe the Horseman Yep. Love him or hate him, Adrian Durham called it out. Obviously resulting in a load of abuse from Derby fans.


urgh did I accidentally say something that agreed with Durham? I'll take it back :wink:


He supports Posh so has an interest in all of this. He is correct about Derby but he is pretty awful otherwise,


He does support them and has a more close-up and interested take on things at the bottom of The Championship, much more so than most sports media types.
He also was one of the few calling out little old lovely Bournemouth when they broke FFP rules and ended up having to cough up £9 million or so.


User avatar
NathStPaul
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 11747
Joined: 19 Feb 2019 14:21

Re: Rival Watch

by NathStPaul » 04 Feb 2022 21:10

Billy Sharp is class. Great movement.

User avatar
CountryRoyal
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 10697
Joined: 12 Aug 2011 13:44

Re: Rival Watch

by CountryRoyal » 04 Feb 2022 21:39

NathStPaul Billy Sharp is class. Great movement.


43 top flight appearances yielding a whole 6 goals in an 18 year career. He’s a good goal scorer at this level but “class” is a bit of a stretch.

User avatar
NathStPaul
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 11747
Joined: 19 Feb 2019 14:21

Re: Rival Watch

by NathStPaul » 04 Feb 2022 21:51

CountryRoyal
NathStPaul Billy Sharp is class. Great movement.


43 top flight appearances yielding a whole 6 goals in an 18 year career. He’s a good goal scorer at this level but “class” is a bit of a stretch.

He has scored the most goals in Championship history. If you don't think that makes him a class player then that's up to you. He's a fantastic Championship level striker, couldn't give a toss about the Premier League.

Sutekh
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 20291
Joined: 12 Feb 2014 14:05
Location: Undiscovered pyramid somewhere in Egypt

Re: Rival Watch

by Sutekh » 04 Feb 2022 22:09

NathStPaul
CountryRoyal
NathStPaul Billy Sharp is class. Great movement.


43 top flight appearances yielding a whole 6 goals in an 18 year career. He’s a good goal scorer at this level but “class” is a bit of a stretch.

He has scored the most goals in Championship history. If you don't think that makes him a class player then that's up to you. He's a fantastic Championship level striker, couldn't give a toss about the Premier League.


Agree, he averaged 1 goal every 5 games while at Reading which, given the recent years at the club, could probably be terned world class.


SpaghettiHoop
Member
Posts: 444
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 12:53

Re: Rival Watch

by SpaghettiHoop » 05 Feb 2022 09:16

There's an article in "The Athletic" published yesterday about the plight of Birmingham City - a team with Chinese owners. The situation is similar to ours. Worth a read.

User avatar
CountryRoyal
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 10697
Joined: 12 Aug 2011 13:44

Re: Rival Watch

by CountryRoyal » 05 Feb 2022 12:28

NathStPaul
CountryRoyal
NathStPaul Billy Sharp is class. Great movement.


43 top flight appearances yielding a whole 6 goals in an 18 year career. He’s a good goal scorer at this level but “class” is a bit of a stretch.

He has scored the most goals in Championship history. If you don't think that makes him a class player then that's up to you. He's a fantastic Championship level striker, couldn't give a toss about the Premier League.


So you couldn’t give a damn about comparing him at the level where the very best, and genuinely class players play?

Ok.

User avatar
NathStPaul
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 11747
Joined: 19 Feb 2019 14:21

Re: Rival Watch

by NathStPaul » 05 Feb 2022 12:42

CountryRoyal
NathStPaul
CountryRoyal
43 top flight appearances yielding a whole 6 goals in an 18 year career. He’s a good goal scorer at this level but “class” is a bit of a stretch.

He has scored the most goals in Championship history. If you don't think that makes him a class player then that's up to you. He's a fantastic Championship level striker, couldn't give a toss about the Premier League.


So you couldn’t give a damn about comparing him at the level where the very best, and genuinely class players play?

Ok.

In a thread about rivals and teams who play in the same division as us? No.

User avatar
genome
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 25882
Joined: 08 Jul 2012 13:29
Location: Universe

Re: Rival Watch

by genome » 05 Feb 2022 12:54

Maybe Kidderminster are better than we thought.

User avatar
tidus_mi2
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7412
Joined: 15 Jun 2012 15:24

Re: Rival Watch

by tidus_mi2 » 05 Feb 2022 13:09

genome Maybe Kidderminster are better than we thought.

Maybe Aggborough is a shithole that teams in higher divisions aren't used to playing on

Orion1871
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3594
Joined: 14 Jul 2020 09:08
Location: Shut up, dick

Re: Rival Watch

by Orion1871 » 05 Feb 2022 13:29

We should sign Diop. He would fit in well here.

Royal_jimmy
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5178
Joined: 10 Aug 2011 10:44
Location: Planet Earth

Re: Rival Watch

by Royal_jimmy » 05 Feb 2022 13:30

West Ham will probably come back but I feel less bad about our defeat there after that first half :)

17584 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Fluff, Mid Sussex Royal, Sutekh, The Cap, WestYorksRoyal, Who Moved The Goalposts? and 264 guests

It is currently 28 Nov 2024 17:13