by Royals and Racers » 24 Feb 2023 09:00
by Royals and Racers » 26 Feb 2023 13:02
by Royals and Racers » 26 Feb 2023 14:47
by Mr Angry » 26 Feb 2023 17:20
Royals and Racers H-T 0-0
F-T 0-0 - extra time and pens if necessary
E-T H-T 0-0
E-T F-T 0-0 gone to pens
Royals win 5-4 on pens !!!!
by Royals and Racers » 26 Feb 2023 17:22
by Kitsondinho » 26 Feb 2023 21:55
Mr AngryRoyals and Racers H-T 0-0
F-T 0-0 - extra time and pens if necessary
E-T H-T 0-0
E-T F-T 0-0 gone to pens
Royals win 5-4 on pens !!!!
Great result!
by Mr Angry » 26 Feb 2023 22:04
by Kitsondinho » 26 Feb 2023 22:11
Mr Angry This is the complete BBC Sport report on the game.........
"WSL top three Manchester United, Chelsea and Manchester City all claimed convincing wins but Reading and Aston Villa needed penalties to progress.
The Royals edged through their shootout 5-4 after a goalless draw at Tottenham."
Cheers BBC.
by Royals and Racers » 27 Feb 2023 06:51
Mr Angry This is the complete BBC Sport report on the game.........
"WSL top three Manchester United, Chelsea and Manchester City all claimed convincing wins but Reading and Aston Villa needed penalties to progress.
The Royals edged through their shootout 5-4 after a goalless draw at Tottenham."
Cheers BBC.
by Kitsondinho » 27 Feb 2023 10:08
Royals and RacersMr Angry This is the complete BBC Sport report on the game.........
"WSL top three Manchester United, Chelsea and Manchester City all claimed convincing wins but Reading and Aston Villa needed penalties to progress.
The Royals edged through their shootout 5-4 after a goalless draw at Tottenham."
Cheers BBC.
RFC to their credit covered the match well on Twitter and posted a decent report on to the website quite quickly.
by Mr Angry » 27 Feb 2023 10:27
KitsondinhoMr Angry This is the complete BBC Sport report on the game.........
"WSL top three Manchester United, Chelsea and Manchester City all claimed convincing wins but Reading and Aston Villa needed penalties to progress.
The Royals edged through their shootout 5-4 after a goalless draw at Tottenham."
Cheers BBC.
Send them mine
by RoyalBlue » 27 Feb 2023 12:07
KitsondinhoMr Angry This is the complete BBC Sport report on the game.........
"WSL top three Manchester United, Chelsea and Manchester City all claimed convincing wins but Reading and Aston Villa needed penalties to progress.
The Royals edged through their shootout 5-4 after a goalless draw at Tottenham."
Cheers BBC.
Send them mine
by Dirk Gently » 27 Feb 2023 13:33
RoyalBlueKitsondinhoMr Angry This is the complete BBC Sport report on the game.........
"WSL top three Manchester United, Chelsea and Manchester City all claimed convincing wins but Reading and Aston Villa needed penalties to progress.
The Royals edged through their shootout 5-4 after a goalless draw at Tottenham."
Cheers BBC.
Send them mine
And that's the annoying & frustrating thing about their piss poor coverage. They could easily pay someone local a few quid to cover the games. In fact they'd probably find people willing to do it for free in an attempt to build up a reputation and eventually get the opportunity to move into sports journalism on a more professional basis.
by Royals and Racers » 27 Feb 2023 13:43
by RoyalBlue » 27 Feb 2023 15:17
Dirk GentlyRoyalBlueKitsondinho Send them mine
And that's the annoying & frustrating thing about their piss poor coverage. They could easily pay someone local a few quid to cover the games. In fact they'd probably find people willing to do it for free in an attempt to build up a reputation and eventually get the opportunity to move into sports journalism on a more professional basis.
Don't think it's lack of resource - certainly with the men's game it's lack of demand. I saw some stats a few years ago, and the page clicks for the two Manchester Clubs, Chelsea, Liverpool & Arsenal was about 88% of all clicks. Then if you added in Spurs, Real, Barca, Celtic & Rangers that amounted to about 95% of all clicks. All the rest of the league were fighting over the remaining 5% of traffic.
So they'd just say they're catering to what the audience wants, ignoring that this means there's nothing else even if the audience did want it.
by From Despair To Where? » 27 Feb 2023 16:03
by Kitsondinho » 27 Feb 2023 17:44
by morganb » 27 Feb 2023 18:05
by Kitsondinho » 27 Feb 2023 19:28
by RoyalBlue » 27 Feb 2023 19:40
From Despair To Where? The BBC is stuck between a rock and a hard place. Yes they have a public service remit, which I think should tace precidence but they are judged against commercial competitors, all whilst having budgets cut. In many areas, these 2 pressures are mutually exclusive.
You either want a public service broadcaster and fund it accordingly or you want a commercially successful broadcaster that only picks the low hanging fruit.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 192 guests