Rival Watch

17553 posts
Mid Sussex Royal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3516
Joined: 02 Nov 2008 17:56

Re: Rival Watch

by Mid Sussex Royal » 13 Mar 2023 18:46

tidus_mi2
Mid Sussex Royal
Wycombe Royal Cardiff's was lifted when they paid the first instalment of the Sala fee.


Add Huddersfield to the list, they have also failed to submit their accounts on time

Probably gives more credence to the administration rumours.


Yes - and the club making no comment on the delayed accounts

Jackson Corner
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 4858
Joined: 23 Nov 2005 00:55

Re: Rival Watch

by Jackson Corner » 14 Mar 2023 04:19

Just one question? Why have a transfer embargo when you can’t buy anyone?

Stranded
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 20225
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 12:42
Location: Propping up the bar in the Nags

Re: Rival Watch

by Stranded » 14 Mar 2023 08:20

Don't think this Blackpool fan holds out much hope of catching anyone up, let alone us: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HbfnW4ZUwNE

Some of what he says may ring true to a lot of us.

YorkshireRoyal99
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5005
Joined: 10 Aug 2017 18:07

Re: Rival Watch

by YorkshireRoyal99 » 14 Mar 2023 08:31

Have they won the least amount in the league this season Blackpool as well? Going to be a tough ask for them to get out of it, let alone the other 2 if points deductions are applied this season.

windermereROYAL
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 8347
Joined: 19 Feb 2008 11:18

Re: Rival Watch

by windermereROYAL » 14 Mar 2023 08:55

Many people were saying earlier in the season that 50 plus points would be needed to survive this term, now i reckon our current total could be enough.
But of course we may have a points deduction incoming, that said we would still be within touching distance of that mark.


Stranded
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 20225
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 12:42
Location: Propping up the bar in the Nags

Re: Rival Watch

by Stranded » 14 Mar 2023 09:15

YorkshireRoyal99 Have they won the least amount in the league this season Blackpool as well? Going to be a tough ask for them to get out of it, let alone the other 2 if points deductions are applied this season.


Yep 7, equal with Wigan for the lowest.

They are also on a run of 1 win in 20 games - they won 6 of their first 16 and dropped off a cliff since then.

Just looking at the form table over the past 12 games - we've been awful in the main but this is the bottom of that form table:

20th Reading 9 points
21st Wigan 8
22nd Blackpool 7
23rd QPR 7
24th Huddersfield 7

So whilst we have been stinking the place out since the turn of the year we have actually increased the gap over the bottom 3 during that time.

If the bottom 3 take the form over the last 12 to the last 10

Wigan 39*
Blackpool 38
Huddersfield 38*

*Not including potential deductions

Our current form is good enough for 8 more points - so 54 (or 48 with 6 points off).

To get to a "safe" tally of around 48 - any of the 3 would now need to hit play-off form over the last 10 games - again without deductions in the case of Wigan and Huddersfield. Even getting to 42 would mean they have to improve their form twice over from around 0.5 PPG to 1 PPG.

Not impossible but unlikely.

YorkshireRoyal99
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5005
Joined: 10 Aug 2017 18:07

Re: Rival Watch

by YorkshireRoyal99 » 14 Mar 2023 09:16

windermereROYAL Many people were saying earlier in the season that 50 plus points would be needed to survive this term, now i reckon our current total could be enough.
But of course we may have a points deduction incoming, that said we would still be within touching distance of that mark.


At one point it looked like it might have been. West Brom occupied 22nd place after 20 games and had 23 points and Blackpool were 23rd with 23 points from 22 games (West Brom had played 2 games less at the time) so a couple of teams in the bottom 3 were averaging over a point a game.

Obviously that's not the case anymore, as some teams at the bottom do tend to drop off massively between sort of January, February and early March time before picking up as they fight for survival. Not sure if that will happen this year as the bottom 3 really aren't that good and aren't exactly within touching distance of the teams above either at the moment.

User avatar
Snowflake Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 42579
Joined: 20 Jun 2017 17:51

Re: Rival Watch

by Snowflake Royal » 14 Mar 2023 12:09

Jackson Corner Just one question? Why have a transfer embargo when you can’t buy anyone?

Technically you can sign players who are unattached.

Hound
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 25258
Joined: 27 Sep 2016 22:16
Location: Simpleton

Re: Rival Watch

by Hound » 14 Mar 2023 12:42

Snowflake Royal
Jackson Corner Just one question? Why have a transfer embargo when you can’t buy anyone?

Technically you can sign players who are unattached.


Can’t imagine Burnley are that bothered tbh


User avatar
Snowflake Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 42579
Joined: 20 Jun 2017 17:51

Re: Rival Watch

by Snowflake Royal » 14 Mar 2023 12:46

Hound
Snowflake Royal
Jackson Corner Just one question? Why have a transfer embargo when you can’t buy anyone?

Technically you can sign players who are unattached.


Can’t imagine Burnley are that bothered tbh

No of course not.

But a meaningless sanction is better than no sanction, and more proportionate than a fine of points deduction. And it could become meaningful eventually.

User avatar
Silver Fox
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 26240
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 10:02
Location: From the Andes to the indies in my undies

Re: Rival Watch

by Silver Fox » 14 Mar 2023 13:00

Snowflake Royal But a meaningless sanction is better than no sanction,.


No, it's the same, that's why it's meaningless

User avatar
Snowflake Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 42579
Joined: 20 Jun 2017 17:51

Re: Rival Watch

by Snowflake Royal » 14 Mar 2023 13:02

Silver Fox
Snowflake Royal But a meaningless sanction is better than no sanction,.


No, it's the same, that's why it's meaningless

No sanction says this is fine.

A meaningless sanction that could become meaningful, says this is not fine but we're being proportionate.

User avatar
Hendo
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 21866
Joined: 25 Mar 2012 20:53
Location: Lambs to the cosmic slaughter

Re: Rival Watch

by Hendo » 14 Mar 2023 13:39

Whilst probably meaningless to Burnley, I would imagine that isn't the point.

Just something which triggers an automatic ban, whether you're 1st in the Champ or last in L2. They can't say:

"Yeah Burnley have broken this rule, but we're not going to apply this ban because they're really unlikely to sign anyone."


Mr Angry
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5962
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 16:05
Location: South Oxfordshire

Re: Rival Watch

by Mr Angry » 14 Mar 2023 13:58

If the punishment was for the next 2 transfer windows when Burnley are in the Championship, that would have more teeth.....

User avatar
paultheroyal
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 12837
Joined: 04 Mar 2005 12:59
Location: Hob Nob Reality TV Champ 2010/2011

Re: Rival Watch

by paultheroyal » 14 Mar 2023 15:55

Wigan and Huddersfield close to administration - could be this week. What a dire situation in the championship.

So that leaves Blackpool, who on the pitch look utterly dire!!

User avatar
LUX
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 13368
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:38
Location: Keep this frequency clear

Re: Rival Watch

by LUX » 14 Mar 2023 16:00

YorkshireRoyal99
the bottom 3 really aren't that good and aren't exactly within touching distance of the teams above either at the moment.


er, if Blackpool win at home to QPR tonight and we lose at Blackburn tomorrow (both very possible), our six point deduction would have us three points above the bottom three with nine (?) games left. I discount Wigan and Huddersfield as they are apparently having deductions too, even if Wigan's will only be three points.

YorkshireRoyal99
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5005
Joined: 10 Aug 2017 18:07

Re: Rival Watch

by YorkshireRoyal99 » 14 Mar 2023 16:08

LUX
YorkshireRoyal99
the bottom 3 really aren't that good and aren't exactly within touching distance of the teams above either at the moment.


er, if Blackpool win at home to QPR tonight and we lose at Blackburn tomorrow (both very possible), our six point deduction would have us three points above the bottom three with nine (?) games left. I discount Wigan and Huddersfield as they are apparently having deductions too, even if Wigan's will only be three points.


Yep, agree, but at the moment that's not the case. We can hope the hoola hoops do us a favour tonight by taking points off Blackpool.

Editing in here, McCarthy has said that Blackpool need points and they want to be within 4 points away before the international break and that could leave them optimistic. A double home fixture against QPR and Coventry, you've got think if they don't win either of those games, they are gone.
Last edited by YorkshireRoyal99 on 14 Mar 2023 16:11, edited 1 time in total.

YorkshireRoyal99
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5005
Joined: 10 Aug 2017 18:07

Re: Rival Watch

by YorkshireRoyal99 » 14 Mar 2023 16:10

paultheroyal Wigan and Huddersfield close to administration - could be this week. What a dire situation in the championship.

So that leaves Blackpool, who on the pitch look utterly dire!!


Wigan again?

They were only bought out a year ago weren't they?

Having said that, lack of payments and liquidity isn't exactly the thing you want to be hearing.

User avatar
LUX
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 13368
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:38
Location: Keep this frequency clear

Re: Rival Watch

by LUX » 14 Mar 2023 16:24

chat seems to be 3 points deduction for Wigan and 12 for Huddersfield.

Royal_jimmy
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5166
Joined: 10 Aug 2011 10:44
Location: Planet Earth

Re: Rival Watch

by Royal_jimmy » 14 Mar 2023 18:01

Jackson Corner Just one question? Why have a transfer embargo when you can’t buy anyone?


To save a company from having an unfair advantage vs others in the league

17553 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 273 guests

It is currently 16 Nov 2024 06:38