SutekhRaxSutekh Also posted in the R&G section, Reading manager's records since Mark McGhee arrived in May 1991 (in order of win ratio):Pos Name - Win Ratio % - Loss Ratio %
- Alan Pardew - 48.3 - 27.4
- Brian McDermott (1) - 45.0 - 29.6
- Steve Coppell - 44.3 - 31.6
- Mark McGhee - 43.2 - 29.0
- Jaap Stam - 40.8 - 35.7
- Mark Bowen - 37.2 - 34.8
- Nigel Adkins - 36.3 - 38.8
- Quinn/Gooding - 35.8 - 36.6
- Steve Clarke - 35.8 - 37.7
- Veljko Paunovic - 34.9 - 43.3
- Terry Bullivant - 32.0 - 40.0
- Paul Ince - 31.0 - 50.0
- Brian McDermott (2) - 30.0 - 43.3
- Tommy Burns - 29.4 - 44.1
- Brendan Rodgers - 26.1 - 47.8
- Jose Gomes - 23.6 - 39.5
- Paul Clement - 23.3 - 50.0
Congratulations to Mr Ince and Mr Clement in reaching the magic 50% ratio.
Conclusion - don't appoint managers with the first name of Paul.
I'm amazed Terry the Taxi fared so well - that season was spectacularly s**t!
Ince was worse than Bullivant but I'm not sure it actually felt like it!
And the other obvious fact is that Reading don't spend well when spending big, those pesky Chinese/Thai owners you might say but it was the exact same thing even under SJM as Burns seemed to try and sign anyone who looked like they might be able to kick a ball but he is also one of the worst ever managerial incumbents!
Alan Pardew had the right approach with player investment, spent big when the right option was available that would fit in with the system, but also found several underrated gems for not all that much.
Next fact of the bleedin' obvious - dont buy players when you don't have an established plan/system/style/clue. You have to define a plan/system/style/clue first and for that you need a manager people can trust (and i include a good proportion of a fanbase in that) from the getgo.
I agree with this. Chelsea are a prime example of buying players without any sort of a plan.